Skip to main content

English worship of mediocrity



One of the infinite paradoxes that haunt CBSE is its attitude to the assessment of English. A student in Kerala was awarded 100 marks in all subjects except English in the last class 12 examination. There may be other such students too but my information is confined to this case for now. My first question is why the student was deprived of one mark in English? [The other questions will follow soon.]

I have been an examiner of CBSE for two decades now. I have never succeeded in comprehending the Board’s claim to “objectivity” in assessment.  The Board gives an astoundingly protracted set of instructions to the examiner before the evaluation process every year in order to ensure “objectivity”. But don’t you dare to follow those instructions! If you do, you become an outdated gargoyle stuck up on a post-truth façade. Why? [That’s the next question.]

Why? Those instructions are only meant to help you to award marks liberally. Almost any answer can be accepted as right if you look at those instructions. Be liberal. Be generous. This is the sum of all those instructions. Then why do we need all these instructions? That’s the next question.

We need these instructions in order to cut down that one mark from the student who threatens to jettison the sacred convention of not awarding 100 percent to English. You can always find a clause or sub-clause with which you can slash half a mark here and another half there so that the perfect 100 loses its crown. Why does the Board do that?

Honestly, I have never figured out. The only answer given by CBSE’s ‘experts’ is that language can never be so 100 % perfect. “Language is also about style, Mr Matheikal,” one expert told me once. Of course, it is. I nod my head. So what? Which style is perfect? How do you judge that?

The truth is that the Board has no genuine answer to that as well as many other problems related to assessment. 100 percent in mathematics or physics doesn’t actually mean that the student has perfect mastery of those subjects. When it comes to English, however, perfection matters! Strange?

It is strange. But I have never been an advocate of excessive magnanimity in valuation of answer sheets. I detest the entire process which is a worship of mediocrity. Just this morning a senior secondary teacher of CBSE answered me with this message on WhatsApp to a related question: [My response is also there.]


All the twenty plus years that I have been an examiner, I have grappled with this enigma: why is every system [I was an examiner with other systems too before joining CBSE] tilted in favour of the mediocre? Why does the world belong to the mediocre so blatantly? The answer, we all know. Another teacher in the above-mentioned WhatsApp group reiterated it:


That’s it. Clear enough.

Now the question why English cannot be awarded 100 still remains a mystery. I hope some genius of CBSE or any other Board will condescend to enlighten me on this.

Next question is what the above WhatsApp comment implies without subtlety. Why is the English assessment system of CBSE is perpetrating this terrible injustice against the brilliant students? When it awards 98% to a mediocre student and cuts down the 99 of the brilliant one to 98 because 99 is meant only for the rarest of the rare [that’s what really happens at the evaluation centres, believe me], it is being shamelessly discriminatory against brilliance. This is one thing that I have never understood all these years that I have been an examiner.

Let me end this apparent diatribe on a personal note. During the evaluation process a few months back, I awarded 99 marks to a candidate whose answers revealed outstanding understanding of the literature lessons and a mature grasp of the social reality in the writing section. I decided to ignore the few minor grammatical errors; they were insignificant anyway in comparison with the content. But my Supervisors cut down one mark because of those grammatical errors. Yet another brilliant student merged into answer sheets that carried endless grammatical and spelling errors and, worse, seriously inferior content but scored 98!

Inferiority of the content is what really bugs me. Serious thinkers are always sidelined in this world that worships mediocrity. Why? That’s my last question. I know the answer. The above WhatsApp comment gives the answer. We all know it too. I’d like to put it this way, however: We’re scared of intellectual brilliance.  

Comments

  1. Pradeep NairJuly 15, 2020 at 11:19 AM

    The problem is not just with English, it's with all Arts or creative subjects, where we don't have a quantified matrix to follow. In mathematics and science, it's easier.

    Excellence or lack of it in creative domains is always a matter of opinion. There can always be a few reasons why something is good and a few other reasons why the same thing is not up to the mark.

    Tough call. The problem can be solved to some extent if we have a quantified matrix for evaluation. Start with 100% for every student. Deduct a fixed score for mistakes like in spelling, grammar, syntax etc. There will be no doubt why a student lost some marks.

    That eliminates subjective interpretations of a piece of writing. And it's possible for someone to score 100%.

    But if one has to evaluate aspects like solidity of an idea, its flow along the passage, clarity and crispness of composition, etc., it's difficult to have a template for evaluation; and opinions are bound to vary depending on who is making the judgement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJuly 15, 2020 at 12:33 PM

      I understand the arts and humanities subjects facing the same problem. After all, how objective can these subjects be? If we make the assessment of a subject like literature objective, the whole essence of the subject will be lost.

      But is excellence really just a matter of opinion? I'm not sure. Aren't there a lot of things whose excellence will be commonly accepted and agreed upon?

      Another issue is about deducting marks for mistakes. Tough to put into practice. In effect,it won't be different from what we are doing now.

      I feel that our obsession with scores as the only way to determine a student's merits should be eradicated. Let there be exams. But there should be something more that explores a student's love for the subject, creativity with it, dexterity with it, and so on.

      Delete
  2. DashyJuly 15, 2020 at 7:30 PM

    I’m glad to see that teachers are talking about this. I had shrugged this matter off with the fact that these marks are no indicators of a student’s skill. In fact, when the subject papers of math/science are tougher than usual, their marking is also made lenient isn’t it? In my year the math paper was that way, and I remember being elated for having done well in spite of the tough paper. But the ones who hadn’t done so well had the same marks as mine.
    Anyway, like you mentioned, it is best to not obsess over the scores alone to determine a student’s merits. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJuly 16, 2020 at 7:42 AM

      I can very well understand your feeling about being placed at par with another student who never did well in the subject that you loved much and happily performed well in spite of the exam being tough. Obviously the assessment system fails when that happens. This tilt in favour of the average becomes a painful tilt against the gifted. It's unfair. It's unfair especially because the average always find a way of getting ahead in life by hook or by crook while the gifted often don't know those tactics. I have been a teacher for decades and have watched the brilliant ones struggling to move on in spite of their brilliance because the world is governed by the mediocre. This is painful especially when you are a victim of the system yourself.

      Delete
  3. जितेन्द्र माथुरJuly 17, 2020 at 10:16 AM

    What's elaborated by you applies to the evaluation of the answer-sheets of the theoretical subjects also. The last line of this post is quite apt. This is the harsh reality of India (at least). Brilliance and genius are scared of and therefore, kept at bay.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalJuly 17, 2020 at 12:57 PM

      Many countries have already changed traditional approaches to assessment. There are so many other ways that can check a student's aptitude and skills. Projects, for example. But we in India will find ways of subverting that too.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl
47 comments
Read more

Insecurity and Exclusivism

“ Hindu khatare mein hai.” This was one of the first slogans that accompanied the emergence of Narendra Modi on the national scene. It means Hindus are in Danger . It reveals a deep-rooted feeling of insecurity. Hindus constitute an overwhelming majority in India – 80%. All the high positions in governance, judiciary, academics, any significant place, are occupied by Hindus. Yet the slogan was born. Strange? It will be facile to argue that Modi used this slogan and its concomitant hatred of Muslims and Christians as a political weapon for winning votes. True, he was successful in that; he rose to the highest political post in the country using minority-bashing. But the hatred did not end with that achievement; rather it spread outward and became more exclusive. Muslim and European rulers of India were booted out from the country’s history books and wherever else possible like the names of roads and institutions. With vengeance. Now there is a concerted effort going on to place In...
10 comments
Read more

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...
16 comments
Read more

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...
19 comments
Read more

You Don’t Know the Sky

I asked the bird to lend me wings. I longed to fly like her. Gracefully. She tilted her head and said, “Wings won’t be of any use to you because you don’t know the sky.” And she flew away. Into the sky. For a moment, I was offended. What arrogance! Does she think she owns the sky? As I watched the bird soar effortlessly into the blue vastness, I began to see what she meant. I wanted wings, not the flight. Like wanting freedom without the responsibility that comes with it. The bird had earned her wings. Through storms, through hunger, through braving the odds. She manoeuvred her way among the missiles that flew between invisible borders erected by us humans. She witnessed the macabre dance of death that brought down cities, laid waste a whole country. Wings are about more than flights. How often have you perched on the stump of a massive tree brought down by a falling warhead and wept looking at the debris of civilisations? The language of the sky is different from tha...
13 comments
Read more