Skip to main content

English worship of mediocrity



One of the infinite paradoxes that haunt CBSE is its attitude to the assessment of English. A student in Kerala was awarded 100 marks in all subjects except English in the last class 12 examination. There may be other such students too but my information is confined to this case for now. My first question is why the student was deprived of one mark in English? [The other questions will follow soon.]

I have been an examiner of CBSE for two decades now. I have never succeeded in comprehending the Board’s claim to “objectivity” in assessment.  The Board gives an astoundingly protracted set of instructions to the examiner before the evaluation process every year in order to ensure “objectivity”. But don’t you dare to follow those instructions! If you do, you become an outdated gargoyle stuck up on a post-truth façade. Why? [That’s the next question.]

Why? Those instructions are only meant to help you to award marks liberally. Almost any answer can be accepted as right if you look at those instructions. Be liberal. Be generous. This is the sum of all those instructions. Then why do we need all these instructions? That’s the next question.

We need these instructions in order to cut down that one mark from the student who threatens to jettison the sacred convention of not awarding 100 percent to English. You can always find a clause or sub-clause with which you can slash half a mark here and another half there so that the perfect 100 loses its crown. Why does the Board do that?

Honestly, I have never figured out. The only answer given by CBSE’s ‘experts’ is that language can never be so 100 % perfect. “Language is also about style, Mr Matheikal,” one expert told me once. Of course, it is. I nod my head. So what? Which style is perfect? How do you judge that?

The truth is that the Board has no genuine answer to that as well as many other problems related to assessment. 100 percent in mathematics or physics doesn’t actually mean that the student has perfect mastery of those subjects. When it comes to English, however, perfection matters! Strange?

It is strange. But I have never been an advocate of excessive magnanimity in valuation of answer sheets. I detest the entire process which is a worship of mediocrity. Just this morning a senior secondary teacher of CBSE answered me with this message on WhatsApp to a related question: [My response is also there.]


All the twenty plus years that I have been an examiner, I have grappled with this enigma: why is every system [I was an examiner with other systems too before joining CBSE] tilted in favour of the mediocre? Why does the world belong to the mediocre so blatantly? The answer, we all know. Another teacher in the above-mentioned WhatsApp group reiterated it:


That’s it. Clear enough.

Now the question why English cannot be awarded 100 still remains a mystery. I hope some genius of CBSE or any other Board will condescend to enlighten me on this.

Next question is what the above WhatsApp comment implies without subtlety. Why is the English assessment system of CBSE is perpetrating this terrible injustice against the brilliant students? When it awards 98% to a mediocre student and cuts down the 99 of the brilliant one to 98 because 99 is meant only for the rarest of the rare [that’s what really happens at the evaluation centres, believe me], it is being shamelessly discriminatory against brilliance. This is one thing that I have never understood all these years that I have been an examiner.

Let me end this apparent diatribe on a personal note. During the evaluation process a few months back, I awarded 99 marks to a candidate whose answers revealed outstanding understanding of the literature lessons and a mature grasp of the social reality in the writing section. I decided to ignore the few minor grammatical errors; they were insignificant anyway in comparison with the content. But my Supervisors cut down one mark because of those grammatical errors. Yet another brilliant student merged into answer sheets that carried endless grammatical and spelling errors and, worse, seriously inferior content but scored 98!

Inferiority of the content is what really bugs me. Serious thinkers are always sidelined in this world that worships mediocrity. Why? That’s my last question. I know the answer. The above WhatsApp comment gives the answer. We all know it too. I’d like to put it this way, however: We’re scared of intellectual brilliance.  

Comments

  1. The problem is not just with English, it's with all Arts or creative subjects, where we don't have a quantified matrix to follow. In mathematics and science, it's easier.

    Excellence or lack of it in creative domains is always a matter of opinion. There can always be a few reasons why something is good and a few other reasons why the same thing is not up to the mark.

    Tough call. The problem can be solved to some extent if we have a quantified matrix for evaluation. Start with 100% for every student. Deduct a fixed score for mistakes like in spelling, grammar, syntax etc. There will be no doubt why a student lost some marks.

    That eliminates subjective interpretations of a piece of writing. And it's possible for someone to score 100%.

    But if one has to evaluate aspects like solidity of an idea, its flow along the passage, clarity and crispness of composition, etc., it's difficult to have a template for evaluation; and opinions are bound to vary depending on who is making the judgement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand the arts and humanities subjects facing the same problem. After all, how objective can these subjects be? If we make the assessment of a subject like literature objective, the whole essence of the subject will be lost.

      But is excellence really just a matter of opinion? I'm not sure. Aren't there a lot of things whose excellence will be commonly accepted and agreed upon?

      Another issue is about deducting marks for mistakes. Tough to put into practice. In effect,it won't be different from what we are doing now.

      I feel that our obsession with scores as the only way to determine a student's merits should be eradicated. Let there be exams. But there should be something more that explores a student's love for the subject, creativity with it, dexterity with it, and so on.

      Delete
  2. I’m glad to see that teachers are talking about this. I had shrugged this matter off with the fact that these marks are no indicators of a student’s skill. In fact, when the subject papers of math/science are tougher than usual, their marking is also made lenient isn’t it? In my year the math paper was that way, and I remember being elated for having done well in spite of the tough paper. But the ones who hadn’t done so well had the same marks as mine.
    Anyway, like you mentioned, it is best to not obsess over the scores alone to determine a student’s merits. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can very well understand your feeling about being placed at par with another student who never did well in the subject that you loved much and happily performed well in spite of the exam being tough. Obviously the assessment system fails when that happens. This tilt in favour of the average becomes a painful tilt against the gifted. It's unfair. It's unfair especially because the average always find a way of getting ahead in life by hook or by crook while the gifted often don't know those tactics. I have been a teacher for decades and have watched the brilliant ones struggling to move on in spite of their brilliance because the world is governed by the mediocre. This is painful especially when you are a victim of the system yourself.

      Delete
  3. What's elaborated by you applies to the evaluation of the answer-sheets of the theoretical subjects also. The last line of this post is quite apt. This is the harsh reality of India (at least). Brilliance and genius are scared of and therefore, kept at bay.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many countries have already changed traditional approaches to assessment. There are so many other ways that can check a student's aptitude and skills. Projects, for example. But we in India will find ways of subverting that too.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Life of a Transgender

Book Review Title: From Manjunath to Manjamma Authors: B Manjamma Jogathi with Harsha Bhat Publisher: HarperCollins India, 2023 Pages: 171 I had an aversion towards the transgender people I met on the trains during my frequent travels as a younger man. These people came across as rude and vulgar. They would enter the train compartment in a large group, clapping hands loudly, waking up sleeping passengers and insisting on being given generous alms. They would go to the extent of hectoring the passengers, even making physical intrusions like poking and caressing body parts that we won’t let strangers touch. Reading Arundhati Roy’s novel, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness , a few years ago, made me look at transpersons with some empathy. Anjum, the transperson protagonist, is also a Muslim. Double alienation. Anjum is an undesirable citizen of the country by virtue of being a transperson who is also a Muslim. She is pushed out of the mainstream literally and driven to living i

Hate Politics

Illustration by Copilot Hatred is what dominates the social media in India. It has been going on for many years now. A lot of violence is perpetrated by the ruling party’s own men. One of the most recent instances of venom spewed out by none other than Mithun Chakraborty would shake any sensible person. But the right wing of India is celebrating it. Seventy-four-year-old Chakraborty threatened to chop the people of a particular minority community into pieces. The Home Minister Amit Shah was sitting on the stage with a smile when the threat was issued openly. A few days back, a video clip showing a right-winger denying food to a Muslim woman because she refused to chant ‘Jai Sri Ram’ dominated the social media. What kind of charity is it that is founded on hatred? If you go through the social media for a while, you will be astounded by the surfeit of hatred there. Why do a people who form the vast majority of a country hate a small minority so much? Hatred usually comes from some

Vultures and Religion

When vultures become extinct, why should a religion face a threat? “When the vultures died off, they stopped eating the bodies of Zoroastrians…” I was amused as I went on reading the book The Final Farewell by Minakshi Dewan. The book is about how the dead are dealt with by people of different religious persuasions. Dead people are quite useless, unless you love euphemism. Or, as they say, dead people tell no tales. In the end, we are all just stories made by people like the religious woman who wrote the epitaph for her atheist husband: “Here lies an atheist, all dressed up and no place to go.” Zoroastrianism is a religion which converts death into a sordid tale by throwing the corpses of its believers to vultures. Death makes one impure, according to that religion. Well, I always thought, and still do, that life makes one impure. I have the support of Lord Buddha on that. Life is dukkha , said the Enlightened. That is, suffering, dissatisfaction and unease. Death is liberation

Trapped in Pandora’s Shadows

Anjana Alphons George I wanted this to be a guest post from a former student. However, getting this poem from Anjana Alphons George wasn’t quite easy. So this is going to be a hybrid of the guest and the host coming together like the waves and the intertidal zone in the ocean. “I’ve become your fan,” I said to Anjana. She was in grade 10. I wasn’t teaching her since my classes were confined to grades 11 and 12. It was a few years back. Anjana had delivered a speech in the weekly morning assembly. Her speech was entirely different from all the speeches of students I had ever listened to. It sounded impromptu. It carried feelings from the heart. Convictions, rather. It was motivational. Inspiring. It moved goosebumps on my skin. “Your speech was splendid,” I told her when I met her on the corridor later in the day. She became my student in grades 11 and 12 and I watched her grow up into intellectual and emotional maturity. When I asked her to write a guest post on my blog, I ha