Skip to main content

The Awards I never received



Recently I reviewed a book in my blog. The author of the book did not express any opinion about the review though I was asked politely enough to add the review at two more places which I did. A month later I came to know that my review was sent verbatim by the author to another blogger who published it in her blog without making any change as if it was written by her. The author of the book went on to heap praises on that review and promoted it in various social media too. She even described it as the best review her book had received. Apologies and explanations followed in due course of time though I never pointed out any of these to the persons concerned. Someone else who knew me through my writings raised the question somewhere without my knowledge.

This happened when I had just turned 60, too old to be surprised by such events. Life makes you immune to surprises much before the age of 60.

I can say boldly placing my palm on my heart that I have done my best in the two fields that fascinated me: teaching and writing. My best may not be anything much for many. That’s a different matter. The point is that I placed my trust in sincerity to the job I did.

But I was never rewarded anything more than the monetary remunerations. People have made me write a lot and put their names to those writings. My students made me write references and then got them signed by bigger names in the profession. I have written much over the last many years which carried other people’s names and pics. I have seen teachers who hardly entered the classroom getting national awards for best teachers. Recently I was asked by a college professor to help him write a paper needed for his next increment. I refused this for reasons that have no relevance here. But this professor is someone who earns ten times more than I do and as far as I know he has hardly written any of his papers on his own.

These things happen. They stopped bothering me long ago. A thought occurred to me this morning, however. Does it happen because I am as unlovable a person as I think I am? That was my answer to the riddle so long. I know that I have many personal traits which make me quite detestable and that is precisely why I stay away from people. I am aware of my hubris, my absolute intolerance of views and opinions that I consider fatuous, my ruthless bluntness in expressing my views, my intrinsic misanthropy, and the agonising shyness that prevents me from looking like a social buffoon. More, I am sure. You’ll surely get them if you ask the thousands of people whom I have met as part of my regular affairs in the last half a century or so.

Okay, I accept my unlovableness. But then are all those people who get what they want and more, who get more than what they deserve, really the paragons of lovability? Or is it just that they know how to get what they want and more?

I think the latter is the point. If you look at it in a slightly different way, the real point is what is it that one really wants. Do you want the satisfaction of doing what you love to do the best way possible for you or do you want the accolades?

It may not be as simple as that either. It may be that you really don’t know how to manage both. Or you don’t know which matters more to you. Or you’re not as smart as you think.

That last point blinks at me with a devilish grin. I love that devil.   




Comments

  1. Not really sir. I don't think it's got anything to do with being unlovable. We all know how hollow the writing world is. Not everyone who gets the attention deserves it. Also, some people appear as if they write for the love of writing. You appear as one such person. Who writes because he must, and because the others must gain from your wisdom. Maybe you don't need any other way of getting those accolades. Some people need to make a lot of noise for that. Your writing gets you there. Having said that I also believe that people like you are likely to be taken for granted because they appear dispassionate when it comes to claps or flaks. But I guess you have your genuine reader base and that is more than enough. I'm one of them! To read you means to learn a lot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not complaining, Sonia. Just wondering loud why this has to be like this for years and years. I know I have some good friends here as well as in the teaching-learning domain. You're right, I write for the love of it and the claps really won't make much difference. There are moments, however, when too many things begin to appear ghostly and ghastly at once!

      Delete
  2. They are not paragons of livability... It's just that they know how to get what they want... As you rightly said Sir. As for those at the other end of the spectrum... Well, as long as whatever you do gives any kind of happiness or satisfaction I guess one doesn't bother about the rest... And if not.. If one gets bothered and feels betrayed then well best is to stop doing the good deeds... It's not going to make you lovable anyways... And mental peace is supreme any day!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wished to highlight the issue so that at least one or two will think about it. That's all. Personally I have crossed the stage for looking for appreciation. When my wife shows my own writing coming back to me bearing somebody else's name and makes fun of me mischievously, I smile with equal mischief. I love that impishness.

      Delete
  3. Yes sir. I do understand those moments and they can be overpowering but only for a while I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Many times it happens with me as well at work place. Sometimes in personal life too.. I totally get it what are you saying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Smartness is the real thing, I have always felt. The smart people always get what they want and they know how to exploit others smartly too.

      Delete
  5. Your book on coping with suffering has helped me a lot in reinforcing my belief in Buddhism and how Buddhism is reflected in most of the philosophies dealing in suffering. The tone of your book is quite similar to Sapiens, although I would have loved to read a longer version of your book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad to know you liked the book. I kept it short because I wasn't sure how many people would be interested in something like that. It's hard to get readers these days.

      Delete
  6. When you listen to the stories of success, it's often about how they happened to be in the right place at the right time. A lot of work that are worthy go unrecognized. And yes, some people have that knack to get what they want, I suppose. Even though in the end it's about what we really want, and we get the satisfaction of doing what we love, wouldn't we still seek validation?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's precisely my dilemma, Dashy. Since I have no satisfactory answer to this, I console myself with the impish grin which is cynicism in disguise. I became a cynic because of certain bitter experiences like the ones I mentioned in the post.

      I lack that knack for getting what I want. Perhaps I lack a lot of other things too.

      Delete
    2. I didn't mean it to sound negative at all. I smile a lot :)

      Delete
  7. It all boils down to what we think ourselves. If we think this way or that way both would be true. It is what is called a self fulfilling prophecy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We can go on without accolades. No doubt. But once in a while a pat on the back does a lot of good. We are human, after all.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...