Skip to main content

India: Many Nations

From 'Open'


India is not one but many nations. “You can only speak of India in the plural,” as Dr Shashi Tharoor puts it in his article in the Open magazine’s Freedom Issue dated Aug 22. There are many Indias, he says, making up what India today is. There is too much diversity in this country: languages, cultures, religions, races, and so on for it to be a monolithic nation. Slogans such as One India, One Language, One Religion are not only absurd but also chimeric.

Among many other things that make India different from other countries, Tharoor mentions that the country’s civilization gave birth to four major religions, a dozen different traditions of classical dance, 85 political parties and 300 ways of cooking the potato. Where on earth would you find a country in which a Roman Catholic political leader of Italian origin making way for a Sikh man to be sworn in as Prime Minister by a Muslim President? [2004 scenario]

India has no majority community, Tharoor argues. All are minorities in India one way or another. If you are a Brahmin, you belong to 10% of the country’s population. If you are an OBC of the Yadav variety, you are in the minority group of 15%. There is no monolithic or monocultural Hinduism in India. A Tamil Hindu has little in common with a Haryanvi Hindu. Culturally a Malayali Hindu and a Malayali Christian will have much more in common than a Malayali Hindu and a Bihari Hindu.

Tharoor finds a telling symbol for India from his constituency. “In Thiruvananthapuram,” he says, “there stands in Palayam the towering St Joseph’s Cathedral, diagonally across from the Juma Masjid, while a few metres down the street is one of the oldest and most revered temples to Ganapati. That is India.” It is that India with its unique charm that is under threat today from the supporters of majoritarian nationalism.

The Frontline magazine too has a Freedom Edition dated Aug 26. It carries, among many other things, an interview with Rajmohan Gandhi, the grandson of the Father of the Nation and eminent historian. “In old age,” says Gandhi, “I am witnessing a fearsome assault on my boyhood dream. What wounds me the most is the silence from the top about cruelties on the ground.” The cruelties are perpetrated in the name of a religion and nationalism. Vigilante groups and TV channels are creating norms in present India. There are parallel governments running in most states with the tacit support of the Union government. 


As Tharoor finds a symbol from Palayam, Rajmohan Gandhi takes his symbol from the Ashoka Pillar that Modi unveiled recently for the new Parliament building. Instead of the original lions which evoked reverence, now we have four snarling lions which evoke terror. This terror lies at the very roots of Modi’s ideology.

India is not really independent, Rajmohan Gandhi thinks. His grandfather would have agreed because the Mahatma did not equate freedom with liberation from colonial rule. Freedom of the spirit was more important for him. Unless every single Indian is free at heart, Independence has no meaning. Liberating India from mutual ignorance, mutual dislike and mutual fear may turn out to be harder than liberating India from the British rule, says Rajmohan Gandhi.

Most periodicals have dedicated their latest issues to celebrating the country’s 75th anniversary of Independence. The weekly, Malayalam [published inn Malayalam by The New Indian Express group], has a long article titled ‘From Nehru to Modi’. It argues that Modi has taken India from Nehru’s secularism to a narrowminded theocracy or ‘religiocracy’. This latest regime favours just a few people, in fact, argues the article. Some religious leaders and a handful of capitalists are the only gainers of the system though it strives to give the impression that the majority community stands to benefit enormously. Look at the present Lok Sabha and see the number of billionaires and criminals there. Ours now is a government of the rich and the criminal.

The article bluntly states that a Prime Minister who constantly preaches about his commitments to his people is in fact scared of simple criticism so much so that too many of his critics are in jail now. Democracy dies almost every day in the country in many forms: from horse-trading of elected politicians to stifling all forms of opposition. The Malayalam article concludes thus: “This country belongs to farmers. To ordinary workers in the villages. To the starving millions in the countryside. To those thousands who can’t afford an alternate pair of dress or proper treatment in good hospitals, to those who don’t even have proper homes to sleep in. A leader who thinks that he is the only leader and all others are his subordinates is not a genuine leader. And Indians must remember that their thinking faculty is not to be kept in a refrigerator.” 


PS. Written for Indispire Edition 418: one nation, one identity , one emotion... and I thought it was unity in diversity... #azadikiamrutotsav

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Excellent post, Tomichan-bhai!!! Such voices as mentioned here must grow louder and grow in number... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Yamini. Today's papers carry reports that the Constitution of Hindu Rashtra is being completed. non-Hindus will have no voting rights.... We do need a lot more sane voices.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...