Skip to main content

Sustainability and Ecoliteracy

Landslide near my village - image from The Hindu


Five members of a family were washed away along with their house the other day just a few kilometres from my village. Such incidents caused by unprecedented landslides are becoming frequent in Kerala. They are some of the consequences of climate change which is itself caused by what we have done to our planet. They are happening not only in Kerala. They happen all over the world.

More than half a century ago scientists warned humanity about an imminent disaster called climate change. In the 1980s many solutions were suggested by concerned scholars and scientists. Lester Brown, one of them, defined sustainability as development that meets our needs without compromising the ability of the future generations to meet their needs. Forty years after the world applauded Brown’s theory, the world stands in much poorer shape today. We don’t put theories into practice; we only clap for them.

It is getting late now. We need to start acting with a sense of urgency. Our planet is in deep trouble. Unpredictable cloudbursts and heat waves and other disasters are swallowing entire regions. People are perishing. Certain species of animals are staring at imminent extinction. The earth is dying. How do we save our planet?

We need a paradigm shift. For decades we have been driven by a system, primarily economic, which put profit before people. Profit was apotheosised as the primary virtue by what came to be known as globalisation which was the latest version of gold rush. A few beat the majority in that rat race and became billionaires and multi-billionaires. They were celebrated in the mass media. They became the only worthwhile heroes. They created a new world, one in which a minority grabbed more and more from the majority and appeared heroic in the process.

This system has to change. That requires what is known as a paradigm shift. The system must reorganise itself. The foundation of the system must shift from avarice to magnanimity. From competition to cooperation. From grabbing to sharing.

This may sound like a platitudinous moral science class. The plain truth is that we don’t have too many alternatives. We need a paradigm shift.

People are willing to care and share. People aren’t as greedy and selfish as they are thought to be. Most people, “deep down, are pretty decent,” as Rutger Bregman puts it in his book, Humankind: A Hopeful History. We need to cultivate that decency. We need a system that nurtures that decency. Globalisation is just the opposite of that system.

Some serious thinkers suggested ecoliteracy as a starting point of the new system. Ecoliteracy recommends a new pedagogy. This pedagogy puts the understanding of life as the most important factor of education. Life is about relationships, not competitions and rivalries and multi-billionaires’ lists in halls of fame.

Ecoliteracy demands that the students should be given experience of learning in the real world. They should grow food, for example. They should participate in restoring a wetland. They should create forests. The pedagogy must enable the students to understand the interrelationship between everything on the planet. The flapping of a butterfly’s wings in New York may cause a tornado in Australia. The system is as sensitive as that. The students must internalise that fact first of all. Relationships.

Diversity plays a vital role in those relationships. Uniformity and homogeneity are not virtues. Diversity is the very foundation of resilience in nature. Every single species out of all those millions has a role to play in maintaining the balance of the system. It is a delicate system. Tread softly on it. Students must learn that.

Ecoliteracy teaches students that life, from its beginning more than three billion years ago, did not take over the planet by combat but by networking. Relationships.

PS. This post is part of Blogchatter’s CauseAChatter.

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Hear! Hear! In fact, there are schools around the world that take the approach you suggest, engaging youngsters in natural interaction, but it needs to become the uniform situation.YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand that many countries have taken the issue seriously and are implementing policies for saving the planet. My country is yet to learn, I think.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Don Bosco

Don Bosco (16 Aug 1815 - 31 Jan 1888) In Catholic parlance, which flows through my veins in spite of myself, today is the Feast of Don Bosco. My life was both made and unmade by Don Bosco institutions. Any great person can make or break people because of his followers. Religious institutions are the best examples. I’m presenting below an extract from my forthcoming book titled Autumn Shadows to celebrate the Feast of Don Bosco in my own way which is obviously very different from how it is celebrated in his institutions today. Do I feel nostalgic about the Feast? Not at all. I feel relieved. That’s why this celebration. The extract follows. Don Bosco, as Saint John Bosco was popularly known, had a remarkably good system for the education of youth.   He called it ‘preventive system’.   The educators should be ever vigilant so that wrong actions are prevented before they can be committed.   Reason, religion and loving kindness are the three pillars of that syste...

Relatives and Antidepressants

One of the scenes that remain indelibly etched in my memory is from a novel of Malayalam writer O V Vijayan. Father and little son are on a walk. Father tells son, “Walk carefully, son, otherwise you may fall down.” Son: “What will happen if I fall?” Father: "Relatives will laugh.” I seldom feel comfortable with my relatives. In fact, I don’t feel comfortable in any society, but relatives make it more uneasy. The reason, as I’ve understood, is that your relatives are the last people to see any goodness in you. On the other hand, they are the first ones to discover all your faults. Whenever certain relatives visit, my knees buckle and the blood pressure shoots up. I behave quite awkwardly. They often describe my behaviour as arising from my ego, which used to be a oversized in yesteryear. I had a few such visitors the other day. The problem was particularly compounded by their informing me that they would be arriving by about 3.30 pm and actually reaching at about 7.30 pm. ...

Coffee can be bitter

The dawns of my childhood were redolent of filtered black coffee. We were woken up before the birds started singing in the lush green village landscape outside home. The sun would split the darkness of the eastern sky with its splinter of white radiance much after we children had our filtered coffee with a small lump of jaggery. Take a bite of the jaggery and then a sip of the coffee. Coffee was a ritual in our home back then. Perhaps our parents believed it would jolt our neurons awake and help us absorb our lessons before we set out on the 4-kilometre walk to school after all the morning rituals at home. After high school, when I left home for further studies at a distant place, the ritual of the morning coffee stopped. It resumed a whole decade later when I completed my graduation and took up a teaching job in Shillong. But I had lost my taste for filtered coffee by then; tea took its place. Plain tea without milk – what is known as red tea in most parts of India. Coffee ret...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...