Skip to main content

Sustainability and Ecoliteracy

Landslide near my village - image from The Hindu


Five members of a family were washed away along with their house the other day just a few kilometres from my village. Such incidents caused by unprecedented landslides are becoming frequent in Kerala. They are some of the consequences of climate change which is itself caused by what we have done to our planet. They are happening not only in Kerala. They happen all over the world.

More than half a century ago scientists warned humanity about an imminent disaster called climate change. In the 1980s many solutions were suggested by concerned scholars and scientists. Lester Brown, one of them, defined sustainability as development that meets our needs without compromising the ability of the future generations to meet their needs. Forty years after the world applauded Brown’s theory, the world stands in much poorer shape today. We don’t put theories into practice; we only clap for them.

It is getting late now. We need to start acting with a sense of urgency. Our planet is in deep trouble. Unpredictable cloudbursts and heat waves and other disasters are swallowing entire regions. People are perishing. Certain species of animals are staring at imminent extinction. The earth is dying. How do we save our planet?

We need a paradigm shift. For decades we have been driven by a system, primarily economic, which put profit before people. Profit was apotheosised as the primary virtue by what came to be known as globalisation which was the latest version of gold rush. A few beat the majority in that rat race and became billionaires and multi-billionaires. They were celebrated in the mass media. They became the only worthwhile heroes. They created a new world, one in which a minority grabbed more and more from the majority and appeared heroic in the process.

This system has to change. That requires what is known as a paradigm shift. The system must reorganise itself. The foundation of the system must shift from avarice to magnanimity. From competition to cooperation. From grabbing to sharing.

This may sound like a platitudinous moral science class. The plain truth is that we don’t have too many alternatives. We need a paradigm shift.

People are willing to care and share. People aren’t as greedy and selfish as they are thought to be. Most people, “deep down, are pretty decent,” as Rutger Bregman puts it in his book, Humankind: A Hopeful History. We need to cultivate that decency. We need a system that nurtures that decency. Globalisation is just the opposite of that system.

Some serious thinkers suggested ecoliteracy as a starting point of the new system. Ecoliteracy recommends a new pedagogy. This pedagogy puts the understanding of life as the most important factor of education. Life is about relationships, not competitions and rivalries and multi-billionaires’ lists in halls of fame.

Ecoliteracy demands that the students should be given experience of learning in the real world. They should grow food, for example. They should participate in restoring a wetland. They should create forests. The pedagogy must enable the students to understand the interrelationship between everything on the planet. The flapping of a butterfly’s wings in New York may cause a tornado in Australia. The system is as sensitive as that. The students must internalise that fact first of all. Relationships.

Diversity plays a vital role in those relationships. Uniformity and homogeneity are not virtues. Diversity is the very foundation of resilience in nature. Every single species out of all those millions has a role to play in maintaining the balance of the system. It is a delicate system. Tread softly on it. Students must learn that.

Ecoliteracy teaches students that life, from its beginning more than three billion years ago, did not take over the planet by combat but by networking. Relationships.

PS. This post is part of Blogchatter’s CauseAChatter.

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Hear! Hear! In fact, there are schools around the world that take the approach you suggest, engaging youngsters in natural interaction, but it needs to become the uniform situation.YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand that many countries have taken the issue seriously and are implementing policies for saving the planet. My country is yet to learn, I think.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Sex and Sin

Disclaimer: This is not a book review The first discovery made by Adam and Eve after they disobeyed God was sex. Sex is sin in Christianity except when the union takes place with the sole intention of procreation like a farmer sowing the seed. Saint Augustine said, Adam and Eve would have procreated by a calm, rational act of the will if they had continued to live in the Garden of Eden. The Catholic Church wants sex to be a rational act for it not to be a sin. The body and its passions are evil. The soul is holy and belongs to God. One of the most poignant novels I’ve read about the body-soul conflict in Catholicism is Sarah Joseph’s Othappu . Originally written in Malayalam, it was translated into English with the same Malayalam title. The word ‘othappu’ doesn’t have an exact equivalent in English. Approximately, it means ‘scandal’ as in the Biblical verse: “ If anyone causes one of these little ones to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around t...