Skip to main content

Sustainability and Ecoliteracy

Landslide near my village - image from The Hindu


Five members of a family were washed away along with their house the other day just a few kilometres from my village. Such incidents caused by unprecedented landslides are becoming frequent in Kerala. They are some of the consequences of climate change which is itself caused by what we have done to our planet. They are happening not only in Kerala. They happen all over the world.

More than half a century ago scientists warned humanity about an imminent disaster called climate change. In the 1980s many solutions were suggested by concerned scholars and scientists. Lester Brown, one of them, defined sustainability as development that meets our needs without compromising the ability of the future generations to meet their needs. Forty years after the world applauded Brown’s theory, the world stands in much poorer shape today. We don’t put theories into practice; we only clap for them.

It is getting late now. We need to start acting with a sense of urgency. Our planet is in deep trouble. Unpredictable cloudbursts and heat waves and other disasters are swallowing entire regions. People are perishing. Certain species of animals are staring at imminent extinction. The earth is dying. How do we save our planet?

We need a paradigm shift. For decades we have been driven by a system, primarily economic, which put profit before people. Profit was apotheosised as the primary virtue by what came to be known as globalisation which was the latest version of gold rush. A few beat the majority in that rat race and became billionaires and multi-billionaires. They were celebrated in the mass media. They became the only worthwhile heroes. They created a new world, one in which a minority grabbed more and more from the majority and appeared heroic in the process.

This system has to change. That requires what is known as a paradigm shift. The system must reorganise itself. The foundation of the system must shift from avarice to magnanimity. From competition to cooperation. From grabbing to sharing.

This may sound like a platitudinous moral science class. The plain truth is that we don’t have too many alternatives. We need a paradigm shift.

People are willing to care and share. People aren’t as greedy and selfish as they are thought to be. Most people, “deep down, are pretty decent,” as Rutger Bregman puts it in his book, Humankind: A Hopeful History. We need to cultivate that decency. We need a system that nurtures that decency. Globalisation is just the opposite of that system.

Some serious thinkers suggested ecoliteracy as a starting point of the new system. Ecoliteracy recommends a new pedagogy. This pedagogy puts the understanding of life as the most important factor of education. Life is about relationships, not competitions and rivalries and multi-billionaires’ lists in halls of fame.

Ecoliteracy demands that the students should be given experience of learning in the real world. They should grow food, for example. They should participate in restoring a wetland. They should create forests. The pedagogy must enable the students to understand the interrelationship between everything on the planet. The flapping of a butterfly’s wings in New York may cause a tornado in Australia. The system is as sensitive as that. The students must internalise that fact first of all. Relationships.

Diversity plays a vital role in those relationships. Uniformity and homogeneity are not virtues. Diversity is the very foundation of resilience in nature. Every single species out of all those millions has a role to play in maintaining the balance of the system. It is a delicate system. Tread softly on it. Students must learn that.

Ecoliteracy teaches students that life, from its beginning more than three billion years ago, did not take over the planet by combat but by networking. Relationships.

PS. This post is part of Blogchatter’s CauseAChatter.

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Hear! Hear! In fact, there are schools around the world that take the approach you suggest, engaging youngsters in natural interaction, but it needs to become the uniform situation.YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand that many countries have taken the issue seriously and are implementing policies for saving the planet. My country is yet to learn, I think.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Joys of Onam and a reflection

Suppose that the whole universe were to be saved and made perfect and happy forever on just one condition: one single soul must suffer, alone, eternally. Would this be acceptable? Philosopher William James asked that in his 1891 book, The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life . Please think about it once again and answer the question for yourself. You, as well as others, are going to live a life without a tinge of sorrow. Joyful existence. Life in Paradise. The only condition is that one person will take up all the sorrows of the universe on him-/herself and suffer – alone, eternally. What do you say? James’s answer is a firm no . “Not even a god would be justified in setting up such a scheme,” James asserted, knowing too well how the Bible justified a positive answer to his question. “It is expedient that one man should die for the people, so that the nation can be saved” [John 11:50]. Jesus was that one man in the Biblical vision of redemption. I was reading a Malayalam period...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...