From India Today |
Name-changing is one of the hobbies of India’s present
Prime Minister. I wrote about it a few days back too though rather facetiously:
see India,
Bharat, Hindustan. The latest issue of India Today has
devoted page after page to the PM’s present rechristening. I wish to bring here
a few interesting observations from some of those eminent writers in the
weekly.
1. Shashi Tharoor
Tharoor argues that “In English, and therefore
internationally, our country was referred to as ‘India’; in Hindi and other
Indian languages, ‘Bharat’ was our country’s name.” For example: We, the people
of India / Bharat ke log. Or The President of India / Bharat ke
Rashtrapati.
Tharoor gives us an interesting parallel from Germany.
“’Germany’ is Deutschland at home and to all who speak Deutsch (the language we
refer to as ‘German’).” Tharoor dismantles the argument that India is a name
given by the British colonialists. The “name India has nothing to do with
British colonialism: it predates the British presence in India by nearly two
millennia. The ancient Greeks and Persians used the term ‘India’ for the land
beyond the river Sindhu…”
Towards the end of his essay, Tharoor thrusts “the
final clincher: Since our neighbours, the Arabs and the Persians, pronounced ‘s’
as ‘h’, it is also they who called the people across the Sindhu the ‘Hindus’.
So if the BJP rejects the name
India, they will have to reject the name ‘Hindu’ by the same logic, since that
is equally of foreign origin.”
2. Arvind P Datar
Like Tharoor’s example of Germany, Datar (senior
advocate in the Supreme Court) gives the example of Japan. Japan is the English
name for ‘Nihon’ or ‘Nippon’. “It will be strange and improper if an invitation
in English is issued by the Emperor of Nippon or the Chancellor of Deutschland.
Indeed, India is the name that has to be used when the communication is in
English and in in international meetings.”
Datar’s final paragraph is: “India rightly aspires to
be a great economic power and changing our identity to Bharat will not in the
least help us become a five trillion-dollar economy or resolve major problems
facing the nation. The cost of
replacing India with Bharat will be huge with no corresponding benefit.
Sadly, replacing India with Bharat only symbolises a special type of
nationalism that may pay political dividends but will cost the country dear.”
3. Pavan K Varma
The futility and fatuity of this name-changing is
summed up thus by Pavan K Varma, author and former diplomat. “Interestingly, in
2004, when the Mulayam Singh Yadav government in the Uttar Pradesh assembly
passed a resolution to rename India as Bharat, the BJP walked out in protest.
Is it now reversing its stand because the opposition alliance is called INDIA [The
Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance]? Or is it a symbol of
cultural reclamation, at the cost of eliminating another equally valid and
indigenous narrative of history? Either way, Ananthamurthy’s logic was right: ordinary Indians have long happily
accepted both Bharat and India, and also, incidentally, Hindustan. Why reopen
this matter?”
4. Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd
“The name Bharat stemmed from the Sanatan heritage in
post-Vedic times and has caste / racial connotations,” says Shepherd. “The name
of the subcontinent, India, is more acceptable as it mirrors our most ancient
advancement. It unites all under a common identity – Dravidian, Aryan and Mongoloid
races and the teeming agrarian productive masses. Most such productive masses
exist now in social categories like Shudra (OBC), Dalit and Adivasis. The name
of this country must reflect their contribution too. ‘Bharat’ has no such civilisational
significance; it does not encompass the long-existing productive civilisation
of this subcontinent.”
As Tharoor pointed out, Shepherd too argues that “The
use of ‘Hinduism’ should … be relinquished by the RSS/BJP forces to oppose both
Muslims and British rule. An ideal nationalist name for their religion could be
‘Sanatan’. Then the Shudras / Dalits / Adivasis can draw a clear line between
them and Sanatans. The concept
of Sanatan stands for varna dharma.”
From India Today |
Concluding remark
India Today has many more essays on
this topic, written by supporters of Modi’s christening exercise. I chose to
highlight a few points that struck me as interesting.
Modi should expend his energy and the country's resources on worthwhile causes.
ReplyDeleteAll sane voices will be drowned in the raucous cries of (faux?) nationalism.
ReplyDeleteWe're lucky that some sanity is still surviving.
DeleteCreative and informative blogs have been posted. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeletepathology labs in malviya nagar delhi