Skip to main content

Gutenberg in Zuckerberg Era

Gutenberg


Gutenberg revolutionized the world with the invention of the printing technology in the 15th century. The Renaissance and the Reformation as well as the humanist movements owed much to the introduction of printing. Knowledge became relatively more easily available to the public. Knowledge makes a lot of difference.

Knowledge was kept away from the ordinary people for a long time. In our own ancient Bharat [even the name ‘India’ is being made to vanish!], Sanskrit was declared as the language of the gods and hence only Brahmins were supposed to use that language. It is quite another matter, and a terribly ironical one too, that today the descendants of those ancient Brahmins are spending a gigantic sum of money on making people learn Sanskrit. What was forbidden once is an unwanted commodity now.

Brutal punishments were meted out to any low caste person who happened to hear Sanskrit shlokas recited even by chance. Knowledge was appropriated by one particular group of people who knew how to grab and use power for their own benefits. Today their successors do the same thing in a different way. History repeats itself – as comedy, tragedy or farce, depending on which side you are.

Renowned Malayalam novelist O V Vijayan wrote a novel, Thalamurakal – Generations, about a low caste person who wished to acquire Brahminhood by learning Sanskrit and the scriptures. When he finally does become a Brahmin through the yoga of knowledge [gyan yoga], the realisation about the futility of it descends on him like a fatal weapon. He relinquishes his Brahminhood with contempt.

Brahminhood is a kind of hubris, the character realises. There is little difference between his own hubris which made him seek out Brahminhood and the hubris of the ancient Brahmins and that of Hitler’s Nazis. [Vijayan’s novel was published in 1997, much before India became Bharat once again in the hands of certain fascist leaders.]

It is not only in India that knowledge was kept away from the ordinary people. Umberto Eco’s villain in The Name of the Rose is a monk in a medieval monastery who does not want anyone to read anything other than the Bible. All truth lies in the Bible. Why should anyone read anything else? He kills quite many monks for the sake of preventing knowledge from reaching others.

Gutenberg came a century after that, however. Eco’s novel is set in the year 1327.

Now, more than half a millennium later, are we moving backward – from Gutenberg to Zuckerberg, from books to social media, from enlightenment to falsehoods?

Gutenberg is a German name. ‘Guten’ means ‘good’ and ‘berg’ is ‘mountain’. Zuckerberg is a German name too and Mark’s origins lie in Germany. ‘Zucker’ shares its root with ‘sugar’ [or ‘shakar’ in Hindi/Sansksrit – after all, Sanskrit belongs to the Indo-Germanic family of languages]. Maybe, the transition from Gutenberg to Zuckerberg is one from a mountain of knowledge to the delusions of saccharine.

But we are fortunate that Gutenberg’s mountain is still accessible. Project Gutenberg makes about 70,000 free ebooks available to anyone who wishes to read good books. Gutenberg or Zuckerberg? The choice belongs to each one of us.

Zuckerberg

PS. This post is a part of Blogchatter Half Marathon

Previous Post: India, Bharat, Hindustan

 

 

Comments

  1. Indeed Social media is a double edged sword, we can seek enlightenment or post falsehoods too. I didn't know about Project Gutenberg, thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That project is a tremendous service to seekers of good literature.

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    I'm a fan of Project Gutenberg too! Enjoyed your juxtaposition of the two Bergs... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  3. Project Gutenberg is a true representative of the Good mountain of Knowledge. Zuckerberg's innovation too is meant to spread knowledge to the least common denominator but unfortunately being misused by miscreants like any other technology. Man has stopped thinking what's good for him. Tragic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, social media can be a very powerful medium for revolutionary changes. But unfortunately it's pathetically misused.

      Delete
  4. A very beautiful enlightening post. I liked your concept of Guetenberg to Zukerberg i.e., mountain of goodness(Knowledge) to delusion of saccharide....indeed books brought us to knowledge and sweetness of social media leads us to delusional world......I liked how you began the history of printing and transformation to sweet illusion of social media. Your way of drawing our attention to this bitter-sweet truth is appreciable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As a teacher who is in constant touch with young people, I'm astounded by the ignorance of the present generation. That's why i write this sort of posts.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...