Skip to main content

Three Men and One Complex Human Life


One of the best novels ever written is Dostoevsky’s Karamazov Brothers [also translated as The Brothers Karamazov]. Alyosha, Ivan and Dmitri are the three brothers of the title. Each one of them presents a particular way of looking at life, a unique personality. Alyosha is a personification of goodness, Ivan is a man of the intellect, and Dmitri is all passions.

The narrator of the novel tells us that the hero is Alyosha whose story the book really is. But all the three brothers play more or less equal roles and each one of them catches our attention with a vice-like grip. Ivan is the one who has captured my attention right from the first time I read the novel decades ago. Dostoevsky wouldn’t endorse my admiration for Ivan, of course.

Alyosha is Dostoevsky’s ideal human being. He is a 20-year-old handsome person who is a living saint. He is training to be a monk in a monastery. His religious faith is deep and mature. His love for mankind arises from a profound understanding of human ways. He can comprehend Ivan’s intellectual rebellion and Dmitry’s passionate excesses. He knows that good and evil are both inevitable parts of human nature. He has deep faith in the potency of goodness to transform human beings. This doesn’t mean that Alyosha never faces doubts about God or goodness or the worth of what we perceive as human virtues. But he confronts his doubts with his deep faith in goodness, with his unfailing commitment to goodness.

We can foster goodness by being good in spite of all the problems and agonies life will inevitably throw in our path. That is what Alyosha teaches us. That is what Dostoevsky would want us to learn. Alyosha is a spiritual being. His sort of goodness is not quite common among human creatures, however. That is precisely why he fails to fascinate me.

Ivan takes all my attention because he is the genuine intellectual who grapples with life’s absurdities and goes mad in the end. Ivan possesses a brilliant, analytical mind. He could have been a successful scientist had been living in another time or another ambient. His questioning mind is buffeted by the mystery of evil, particularly suffering. If there indeed is a God who cares, why would there be so much suffering in the human world? That is his primary question. If there is a God, He must be malicious and hostile, a sadist par excellence. And if God does not exist, then we are utterly free to do whatever we want. Ivan’s logic obviates the need for morality.

The absolute freedom that agonised Ivan was also a problem for many thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus. They erected great philosophies or worldviews about the agonies and possibilities of human freedom. Ivan, however, remained incapable of such philosophy. That was his nemesis. Dostoevsky would say that people like Ivan are doomed to fail in life because they have no spiritual moorings at all. Without some sort of spirituality, human life is doomed to succumb to despair and madness. Dostoevsky’s protagonist in Crime and Punishment elaborates this theme once again.

I don’t agree with Dostoevsky on that. I would say that Ivan failed to carry his intellectual thinking to philosophical heights. His rebellion stopped short of that great leap.

Spirituality is a leap, a leap of faith. Philosophy is another leap, a leap of the intellect from adolescent rebellion to mature sublimity. One such leap is necessary for human redemption. You can redeem yourself with arts too, for example. An aesthetic leap. Dance your way to salvation. Paint your way to heaven. Sing your way to paradise. Ivan failed to think his way to nirvana.

But Ivan stays in my heart like no other character does. Am I not Ivan to a great extent?

Dmitry is the antithesis of Ivan. If Ivan is all brains, Dmitry is all passions. He is headstrong and reckless. But Dostoevsky makes it clear enough that there is some goodness lying deep within him which can get a divine touch and be salvaged. He is accused of parricide wrongly and punished. His suffering brings him redemption. Suffering has a great redemptive power in Dostoevsky’s worldview. Suffering is like the polishing of diamond. Your soul acquires its genuine sheen through suffering. That is a very Christian outlook. Dostoevsky was an admirer of Jesus, after all.

Alyosha, Ivan and Dmitry are the three Karamazov brothers who have captured the literary world’s fancy ever since they were created. They teach us how life can be hellish without some sort of faith in goodness.

PS. This post is part of the Bookish League blog hop hosted by Bohemian Bibliophile

Comments

  1. I love this post! I have bookmarked it for future re-reads. Reading Dostoevsky requires a particular temperament, I might fair better reading his works now but even without reading it, I already see myself in Ivan. His questions are my questions. And you make so many profound observations, best of them being Ivan failing to carry his intellect to the philosophical heights. Weirdly, its the same conclusion i reached, more aptly, Its this LACKING- i have to work on...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dostoevsky is one of my favorite novelists, the more than century-long gap notwithstanding. He has created such mesmerising characters.

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    Great take! I could go into discussion, but will not and instead, simply revel in the " thinking one's way to Nirvana"! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know you'd love to question some of my observations.

      Delete
  3. It's wonderful when you like a book so much! And yes, sometimes you connect with a character almost instantly. For me, it's difficult to like a story if I don't connect with the characters.
    A very nice write up.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I never really got into Russian lit. It sounds like I fundamentally disagree with the theme of the book, but maybe I might enjoy it. It'll go in the TBR pile.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Read at least one novel of Dostoevsky and you will see a different world altogether.

      Delete
  5. I have some Russian Lit on my good read list.
    Coffee is on.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have only read Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment and Ivan reminds me so much of the anguish and suffering of Raskolnikov... I really found your post very spiritually engaging. The questions you raised ask for a long and enthralling discussion but for now, I am just impressed with the book and your take on it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're right, there's much in common between Ivan and Raskolnikov. Both are misled by the intellect, but both are good at heart.

      Delete
  7. Questions without action can lead to a sort of failure. I loved that point you brought up on how Ivan is unable to transcend his own existential angst.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ivan was prbably Dostoevsky's own existential angst.

      Delete
  8. I'd be like Ivan too, I guess.
    I loved how you say, "Spirituality is a leap, a leap of faith. Philosophy is another leap, a leap of the intellect from adolescent rebellion to mature sublimity. One such leap is necessary for human redemption. You can redeem yourself with arts too"

    ReplyDelete
  9. I haven’t read Dotoveskvy, though your review makes me want to give it a try.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dostoevsky isn't easy reading but if you have patience he's just the writer you can't afford to miss.

      By the way, this post is not a review. Just a btief look at the major characters.

      Delete
  10. Loved your post. Isn't it wonderful when a book makes us think and evaluate and pick sides like this? I have been putting off reading Dostoevsky for 'when I have more time and mindspace' but you make me want to read it. What an interesting idea to have three brothers each with a different life philosophy. I cannot say which of them I would root for without reading the book, but one thing I can say is that intellect without conscience/morals can be a dangerous thing. Ivan's logic that 'we are free to do whatever we want' sounds ominous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Intellect without morals is dangerous, no doubt. But Ivan rises as a kind of hero because he is tormented by that conflict. People like Alyosha have it too easy because they're blessed with genetic goodness.

      Delete
  11. Great Post....I have been reading since I was 16. But I am still scared to attempt his books for fear of not being able to comprehend the depth of those books. Do you have any suggestions for a reader like me on reading his books.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thoroughly enjoyed reading your post! One of my friends is a huge Dostoevsky fan and she had recommended this book and Crime and Punishment but somehow I have never gathered enough courage to read his works!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you can gather the patience to read him, Dostoevsky is an immensely rewarding writer.

      Delete
  13. Ivan's dilemma is one that quite of few of us, those who don't believe in religion but spirituality, have/would face. If there was a kind and benevolent god, why would there be so much suffering in the world.
    Anyway, your post does point to the fact, how some characters are so easy to relate to. They just bury into our psyche, long after we have finished the book.
    p.s. I never gather the courage to read Dostoevsky...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do gather the patience to read him and Dostoevsky is going to stay with you forever.

      Delete
  14. I have had Crime and Punishment on my wish list for decades, but never got down to it. Now, another one is added. Your analysis makes me want to pick up this book. I feel the old writers explored characters more in depth and that is the good part of reading classic literature.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The old writers are far more charming because of their characters.

      Delete
  15. Thank you for prompting me to read the book once more. I read it years ago, forgot it almost.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Interesting post. I have not read the Brothers Karamazov although we own a copy of it, which my dad has read.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Love this post!! I’ve never heard of this book but I’m really intrigued. I’m particular partial to the paragraph you’ve written about the types of “leaps”.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dostoevsky can not only intrigue but also inspire in many ways.

      Delete
  18. The way you penned the review clearly indicates you are in love with book and especially the characters. Your Review is actually encouraging me to pick this book for a read as I am bit biased towords Indian authors than others. But I do read good books of foreign writers too as few blogger friends encourage to pick them through their reviews just like you. Thank You

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wouldn't call this post a review. The novel is too complex for a short review. I just took a glance at 3 major characters.

      Delete
  19. Loved your review. Thanks for introducing this amazing book to me. I will definetly going to read this book

    ReplyDelete
  20. I had started reading this classic as an audiobook. I hope to start once more. This made me go into the spirituality aspect of the writer.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I did try to read The Brothers Karamazov once but I couldn't get through it. Perhaps it wasn't the right time. You post has prompted me to pick it up again. I can say I am a more matured reader now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All the best. Dostoevsky is difficult but worth your effort.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Second Crucifixion

  ‘The Second Crucifixion’ is the title of the last chapter of Dominique Lapierre and Larry Collins’s magnum opus Freedom at Midnight . The sub-heading is: ‘New Delhi, 30 January 1948’. Seventy-three years ago, on that day, a great soul was shot dead by a man who was driven by the darkness of hatred. Gandhi has just completed his usual prayer session. He had recited a prayer from the Gita:                         For certain is death for the born                         and certain is birth for the dead;                         Therefore over the inevitable                         Thou shalt not grieve . At that time Narayan Apte and Vishnu Karkare were moving to Retiring Room Number 6 at the Old Delhi railway station. They walked like thieves not wishing to be noticed by anyone. The early morning’s winter fog of Delhi gave them the required wrap. They found Nathuram Godse already awake in the retiring room. The three of them sat together and finalised the plot against Gand

The Final Farewell

Book Review “ Death ends life, not a relationship ,” as Mitch Albom put it. That is why, we have so many rituals associated with death. Minakshi Dewan’s book, The Final Farewell [HarperCollins, 2023], is a well-researched book about those rituals. The book starts with an elaborate description of the Sikh rituals associated with death and cremation, before moving on to Islam, Zoroastrianism, Christianity, and finally Hinduism. After that, it’s all about the various traditions and related details of Hindu final rites. A few chapters are dedicated to the problems of widows in India, gender discrimination in the last rites, and the problem of unclaimed dead bodies. There is a chapter titled ‘Grieving Widows in Hindi Cinema’ too. Death and its rituals form an unusual theme for a book. Frankly, I don’t find the topic stimulating in any way. Obviously, I didn’t buy this book. It came to me as quite many other books do – for reasons of their own. I read the book finally, having shelv

Vultures and Religion

When vultures become extinct, why should a religion face a threat? “When the vultures died off, they stopped eating the bodies of Zoroastrians…” I was amused as I went on reading the book The Final Farewell by Minakshi Dewan. The book is about how the dead are dealt with by people of different religious persuasions. Dead people are quite useless, unless you love euphemism. Or, as they say, dead people tell no tales. In the end, we are all just stories made by people like the religious woman who wrote the epitaph for her atheist husband: “Here lies an atheist, all dressed up and no place to go.” Zoroastrianism is a religion which converts death into a sordid tale by throwing the corpses of its believers to vultures. Death makes one impure, according to that religion. Well, I always thought, and still do, that life makes one impure. I have the support of Lord Buddha on that. Life is dukkha , said the Enlightened. That is, suffering, dissatisfaction and unease. Death is liberation

Cats and Love

No less a psychologist than Freud said that the “time spent with cats is never wasted.” I find time to spend with cats precisely for that reason. They are not easy to love, particularly if they are the country variety which are not quite tameable, and mine are those. What makes my love affair with my cats special is precisely their unwillingness to befriend me. They’d rather be in their own company. “In ancient time, cats were worshipped as gods; they have not forgotten this,” Terry Pratchett says. My cats haven’t, I’m sure. Pratchett knew what he was speaking about because he loved cats which appear frequently in his works. Pratchett’s cats love independence, very unlike dogs. Dogs come when you call them; cats take a message and get back to you as and when they please. I don’t have dogs. But my brother’s dogs visit us – Maggie and me – every evening. We give them something to eat and they love that. They spend time with us after eating. My cats just go away without even a look af