Skip to main content

Trump in Indian Media


Aroon Purie, editor of India Today, thinks that Trump owes his victory to such issues as price rise, housing crisis, influx of immigrants, and the conservative rebellion against elite wokeism. Trump presidency portends populism, nativism, isolationism, and protectionism, says Purie quoting Condoleeza Rice. The world may not be a happier place with Trump leading America.

“What is the world according to Trump?” India Today’s senior journalist Raj Chengappa asks. His answer: “… it is ensuring America’s interests first with those of every other nation coming a very distant second.” Trump thinks that hitherto the other nations were eating America’s lunch. The allusion is not only to the immigrants but also to America “paying everyone else’s bills to maintain the global order.” Though Trump would like to play a key role in bringing the two wars [Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Gaza] to an end, he will not do anything that will involve a price tag that the US has to pay for.

Chengappa worries that Trump’s protectionism may mark “the beginning of the end of globalisation.” It can adversely affect Indians who are one of the fastest-growing immigrant groups in the US; they represent about 6% of the overall immigrant population. Trump’s policies on migrants aren’t quite friendly or generous. He is likely to restrict migration stringently.

Though Trump may call Modi his “true friend,” he is likely to impose a 10% rise in tariffs on Indian exports to the US, says Chengappa. But the journalist does give due weightage to the camaraderie shared by Trump and Modi. Moreover, the entry of Usha Vance as the wife of VP-elect J D Vance may help India to some extent. For the world history, however, the “predictably unpredictable” Trump may mean some big turning points.

***


Outlook
brought Donald Trump and Kamala Harris together on the cover of its pre-election issue labelling one as ‘insanity’ and the other as ‘inertia.’

Trump enjoys the support of a lot of Americans including the Blacks, says Outlook, because the economy did better under Trump. These people now want Trump to bring jobs back to America from China and other places.

Kamala Harris’s centrist positions have left her vulnerable to attacks from all sides, says Outlook. She is too liberal for conservatives and too cautious for progressives. Her views on the two wars, especially the Israeli one, make people view her as “a figurehead for an increasingly militarised and neoliberal political order.”

Outlook concludes its articles on the US election with this prediction: “Trump’s presidency might mean the end of the road for millions of undocumented immigrants in America and the stifling of the press and free speech. It would mean a deal with Putin over Ukraine effectively letting Russian tanks roll over more of the country. It would mean a question mark over the future of NATO and probably a never-ending war in the Middle East, which is looking to spiral out of control. Trump’s America means making a nation great by closing it off to the world. Another Trump presidency will change America – forever.”

***


S Prasannarajan of the unabashedly right-wing magazine, Open, titled his column this time: Angry America Recasts the Redeemer Cult. According to this journalist, Trump, America’s Redeemer, won because he rebranded the American dream [MAGA: Make America Great Again], led a class war on behalf of the “natives” against the snobbish elites, and successfully converted patriotism into a virtue in a world “radicalised by doctrinaire identity politics.”

M J Akbar, another columnist of Open, mocks Kamala Harris as “a protégé of the elitist monarchs of Washington DC, King Barack and Queen Michelle Obama.” A few paragraphs down, Akbar says that “Harris was never elected by her party, as is the American way. She was anointed by the Obamas and party hegemons like Nancy Pelosi on the assumption that anyone could defeat the dustbin candidate.” Akbar goes to the extent of implying that Harris would have been just a puppet in the hands of the Obamas. For Akbar, Trump is a wealthy version of Victor Hugo’s Jean Valjean whose good intentions and efforts to reform were never considered by the media and the elites of America and instead was pursued mercilessly and villainised unfairly.

***

Let me end this with a joke offered by ChatGPT. 


Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Despotism is alive and kicking. I can't say more - my teeth are too tightly clenched. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Conservatives all over the world will rule. One can analyse till the cows come home.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Sex and Sin

Disclaimer: This is not a book review The first discovery made by Adam and Eve after they disobeyed God was sex. Sex is sin in Christianity except when the union takes place with the sole intention of procreation like a farmer sowing the seed. Saint Augustine said, Adam and Eve would have procreated by a calm, rational act of the will if they had continued to live in the Garden of Eden. The Catholic Church wants sex to be a rational act for it not to be a sin. The body and its passions are evil. The soul is holy and belongs to God. One of the most poignant novels I’ve read about the body-soul conflict in Catholicism is Sarah Joseph’s Othappu . Originally written in Malayalam, it was translated into English with the same Malayalam title. The word ‘othappu’ doesn’t have an exact equivalent in English. Approximately, it means ‘scandal’ as in the Biblical verse: “ If anyone causes one of these little ones to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around t...