Skip to main content

Trump in Indian Media


Aroon Purie, editor of India Today, thinks that Trump owes his victory to such issues as price rise, housing crisis, influx of immigrants, and the conservative rebellion against elite wokeism. Trump presidency portends populism, nativism, isolationism, and protectionism, says Purie quoting Condoleeza Rice. The world may not be a happier place with Trump leading America.

“What is the world according to Trump?” India Today’s senior journalist Raj Chengappa asks. His answer: “… it is ensuring America’s interests first with those of every other nation coming a very distant second.” Trump thinks that hitherto the other nations were eating America’s lunch. The allusion is not only to the immigrants but also to America “paying everyone else’s bills to maintain the global order.” Though Trump would like to play a key role in bringing the two wars [Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Gaza] to an end, he will not do anything that will involve a price tag that the US has to pay for.

Chengappa worries that Trump’s protectionism may mark “the beginning of the end of globalisation.” It can adversely affect Indians who are one of the fastest-growing immigrant groups in the US; they represent about 6% of the overall immigrant population. Trump’s policies on migrants aren’t quite friendly or generous. He is likely to restrict migration stringently.

Though Trump may call Modi his “true friend,” he is likely to impose a 10% rise in tariffs on Indian exports to the US, says Chengappa. But the journalist does give due weightage to the camaraderie shared by Trump and Modi. Moreover, the entry of Usha Vance as the wife of VP-elect J D Vance may help India to some extent. For the world history, however, the “predictably unpredictable” Trump may mean some big turning points.

***


Outlook
brought Donald Trump and Kamala Harris together on the cover of its pre-election issue labelling one as ‘insanity’ and the other as ‘inertia.’

Trump enjoys the support of a lot of Americans including the Blacks, says Outlook, because the economy did better under Trump. These people now want Trump to bring jobs back to America from China and other places.

Kamala Harris’s centrist positions have left her vulnerable to attacks from all sides, says Outlook. She is too liberal for conservatives and too cautious for progressives. Her views on the two wars, especially the Israeli one, make people view her as “a figurehead for an increasingly militarised and neoliberal political order.”

Outlook concludes its articles on the US election with this prediction: “Trump’s presidency might mean the end of the road for millions of undocumented immigrants in America and the stifling of the press and free speech. It would mean a deal with Putin over Ukraine effectively letting Russian tanks roll over more of the country. It would mean a question mark over the future of NATO and probably a never-ending war in the Middle East, which is looking to spiral out of control. Trump’s America means making a nation great by closing it off to the world. Another Trump presidency will change America – forever.”

***


S Prasannarajan of the unabashedly right-wing magazine, Open, titled his column this time: Angry America Recasts the Redeemer Cult. According to this journalist, Trump, America’s Redeemer, won because he rebranded the American dream [MAGA: Make America Great Again], led a class war on behalf of the “natives” against the snobbish elites, and successfully converted patriotism into a virtue in a world “radicalised by doctrinaire identity politics.”

M J Akbar, another columnist of Open, mocks Kamala Harris as “a protégé of the elitist monarchs of Washington DC, King Barack and Queen Michelle Obama.” A few paragraphs down, Akbar says that “Harris was never elected by her party, as is the American way. She was anointed by the Obamas and party hegemons like Nancy Pelosi on the assumption that anyone could defeat the dustbin candidate.” Akbar goes to the extent of implying that Harris would have been just a puppet in the hands of the Obamas. For Akbar, Trump is a wealthy version of Victor Hugo’s Jean Valjean whose good intentions and efforts to reform were never considered by the media and the elites of America and instead was pursued mercilessly and villainised unfairly.

***

Let me end this with a joke offered by ChatGPT. 


Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Despotism is alive and kicking. I can't say more - my teeth are too tightly clenched. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Conservatives all over the world will rule. One can analyse till the cows come home.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...