Skip to main content

Pygmalion’s correct pronunciations


Liza: You are sheer humbug, Professor Higgins. You think you’re great because you have a lot of knowledge. And because you belong to the wealthy class. But I know what you are. Sheer Humbug. And I also know how to deal with you.

Dear Reader, I’m writing this post for a blog hop on Rewriting the ending of a book. The character who speaks the above dialogue belongs to George Bernard Shaw’s classic play Pygmalion which Hollywood converted into an eminently successful movie, My Fair Lady. The movie did give a different ending to the play doing some injustice to Shaw.

Shaw was not alive when Hollywood made the movie. He wouldn’t have liked the movie’s alternative ending simply because he was against sentimental romance. Even love was a philosophy for Shaw. He would have condemned the movie quoting Walter Savage Landor that “to those who have the greatest power of loving, love is a secondary affair.”

Let me offer a different ending. For Blogchatter blog hop.


Liza is ordered by Prof Higgins to bring his chappals before she will be asked to get out of the house since the Prof’s job with her is over. Liza brings the chappals but throws them on to the Prof’s face.

Well, if you’re not familiar with Shaw’s play… here’s a summary copied from the internet:

Pygmalion by George Bernard Shaw is a witty and socially critical play that follows the transformation of Eliza Doolittle, a poor flower girl with a strong Cockney accent, into a polished lady capable of passing as a duchess. This transformation is orchestrated by Henry Higgins, a linguistics professor, who takes on the challenge as part of a bet with Colonel Pickering. As Eliza masters the art of speech and manners, the play explores themes of class, identity, and self-worth, questioning societal norms and the true nature of independence. Ultimately, Eliza asserts her autonomy, refusing to be treated as Higgins' creation or subordinate, leaving their relationship unresolved but deeply thought-provoking.

Now, back to my alternative ending:

Higgins: [shocked at his chappals falling right on his face] Eliza Doolittle, what the hell are you doing?

Liza: Showing you where you belong. To the hypocritical, shallow middle class. Col Pickering once told me about the caste system in India wherein the highest caste called Brahmins decide what all others should do. But who are they to decide all that? They make a religion, they create gods in the name of that religion, they enact rules in the name of those gods. And thus they, the Brahmins become the greatest, and others become what the Brahmins decide. You are just that sort of a Pygmalion, Professor Higgins. You sculpt people’s destinies. And you think you are the greatest. What is your greatness except the fortune you inherited from a class that the so-called Great Britain created with the same villainy that the Indian Brahmins possessed. When you tell me to get out from your house now because you’ve proved what you wanted to by using me as a mere tool, you think you are becoming a great Brahmin. Am I right, Col Pickering?

Col Pickering smiles benignly.

Liza gives him a thumbs-up. The director of the play will have to make all this dramatic enough. Liza has the spirit of the elite but she was unfortunate to have been born in a poor class. It is not the class that matters, director. The spirit. The spirit that can throw chappals on to the faces of those who make the rules and swindle us.

Liza continues her dialogue since Prof Higgins is rendered silent by the chappals thrown on to his face by a Dalit whom he picked up from what he called the gutters and made a Duchess. Not just a Dalit, but a woman too! Double disqualification in India. Even today. In spite of India becoming an economic superpower!

Well, director, how do you show all that? Your house will be raided tomorrow by the superpower’s police. Your office will be raped. Your bank accounts will be blocked.

Prof Higgins will deliver his lecture then to the whole nation. On the importance of correct pronunciation.

PS. This post is written for the blog hop run by Blogchatter – as you understood obviously.

 

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Adaptation to the events of the times - I think Shaw might approve! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. We read Pygmalion in my 12th grade English class. As a class. My fellow students did not like the ending. Then the teacher showed us the movie, and my fellow students were relieved. (I had seen the movie prior to this, so none of this was a surprise.) The older I get, the more I think the play's ending was actually better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I too went through similar feelings about the play and movie. Higgins is not a hero for me now as he was when I was an undergrad studying this play.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...