I’m becoming increasingly convinced that Facebook [FB]
is for the brainless. No wonder why youngsters have abandoned it and taken to
other media such as Instagram.
FB censored the links to my blog posts twice in
succession last week. The posts are innocuous.
1. The Napalm
Girl: The post is about Kim Phuc, the nine-year-old Vietnamese girl who
survived one of the most brutal and absurd wars in human history. FB removed my
link merely because the post contained the classical photo of the little girl
running in pain. FB’s sense of morality stirred its fervent head. But FB
permits utter balderdash written by scoundrels!
2. Women
and Breast Politics: This is the other post that met with FB’s idiosyncratic
sense of morality. The post is about how women were made to go bare-chested in
Kerala till as recently as the turn of the 20th century. It
contained a couple of pictures which I had copy-pasted from an illustrious
Malayalam weekly which is read by certain elite readers in Kerala. I mean, the
magazine is not read by the rank and file. Now you know why FB finds certain
things immoral: FB is meant for the riffraff. But I choose to stick with it for
a while yet. I need to learn certain things more from it about global human
idiocy.
As a friend said, "Social media amplifies voices but often dilutes thought, offering a stage for fleeting opinions while sidelining the depth of critical reasoning."
Hari Om
ReplyDeleteI never did sign up to it. That quote at end is spot on! YAM xx
You're better off without Facebook.
DeleteFB is for old people. And it's a mess. I only check mine because my SIL posts things there sometimes. And I'll wish people a happy birthday. I haven't posted anything just for me in years.
ReplyDeleteI use it for getting my blog across to a few people. There's a sizeable number of readers who come via that platform.
Delete