Skip to main content

Truths of various colours



You have your truth and I have mine. There shouldn’t be a problem – until someone lies. Unfortunately, lying has been elevated as a virtue in present India.

There are all sorts of truths, some of which are irrefutable. As a friend said the other day with a little frustration, the eternal truth is this: No matter how many times you check, the Wi-Fi will always run fastest when you don’t actually need it – and collapse the moment you’re about to hit Submit. Philosophers call it irony. Engineers call it Murphy’s Law. The rest of us just call it life.

Life is impossible without countless such truths. Consider the following;

·      Change is inevitable.

·      Mortality is universal.

·      Actions have consequences. [Even if you may seem invincible, your karma will catch up, just wait.]

·      Water boils at 100oC under normal atmospheric pressure.

·      The three angles of a triangle always sum up to 180 degrees.

·      The disorder in the universe keeps increasing. [Science calls that truth entropy.]

You can’t question such truths. They are universal. Eternal too, I dare say.

Then there are what we may call Authoritative Truths, those which come from scriptures, traditions, and such venerated places. Consider the following:

·      The earth was created by God for the sake of humans. [Abrahamic religions]

·      The Vedas are eternal and infallible.

·      Prophet Muhamad is the final messenger of God.

These may or may not be truths for you depending on which religion you believe in. For me, all the three are false. Yet, for millions of people one or the other is true. The problem with these truths is that they can blind people to real truths. They can also engender conflicts and strife.

Reasoned truths would be the ideal answers to the above problem. These are truths arrived at through logic, philosophy, and rational debates. I know that reason alone doesn’t satisfy us humans. We are highly emotional and quite a bit imaginative too. Most of us can’t live without our gods, demons, and fairies. Personally, I keep these esoteric entities confined to fiction.

Fiction gives us some of the best truths, which we may call Creative truths. Art, literature, and other imaginative works can reveal emotional and existential truths. I love such truths. They are far more valid than any authoritative truth for me.

Then there are Relative truths, those shaped by culture, perspective, context, etc. These have limited relevance and may not be as dangerous as authoritative truths.

Moral truths teach us how to live better lives, based on ethics and values. They are necessary for peaceful, harmonious existence. But hardly anyone seems to care for them nowadays. Those who care seriously may find themselves in prisons, especially in contemporary India.

Power truths tower above all the above truths, especially in countries governed by narcissistic dictators who pretend to be the most benign (if not divine) universal do-gooders. Propaganda and manipulation forge truths in such countries. I live in a country where lies are far more dominant now. And those lies are all Power truths.


If you wish to read more about the above truths, go to Julian Baggini’s slim book, A Short History of Truth: Consolations for a Post-Truth World (2017).

PS. Illustrations by Copilot Designer 

Labels:

Comments

  1. Jose D. MaliekalSeptember 28, 2025 at 11:47 AM

    Thanks for this revision of Epistemological leaf on Truth. Very enlightening, indeed! The truth by power is called post-truth or alternative facts or both, but they are coloured falsities and the Aswathama type half truths of Kurukshetra, after uttering which, Yuhishtira's chariot wheels never rode above the earth, but got halted in the muck. This was quoted by S. A. Dange, to the Congress, headed by none other than Jawaharlal Nehru. To prove the point that Nehru and Indira Priyadarshini had no business in toppling the First Ever Elected Communist Govt of Kerala, through a stage-managed Vimochanasamaram, which saw the Christians and Nairs of Kerala, out on the streets. Satyameva Jayathe.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jose D. MaliekalSeptember 28, 2025 at 11:52 AM

    I heard about this Kurukshetra Speech of Dange from the autobiography of Maverick Mani S Aiyer, of Chaiwallah and Secular Fundamentalism. fame.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jose D. MaliekalSeptember 28, 2025 at 11:55 AM

    As a boy, the Aiyer kid visited the Parliament and happened to listen to the speech. Dange was an orator. No. Doubt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalSeptember 28, 2025 at 12:45 PM

      Thanks for the detailed and enlightening comments. I was always rather scandalised - later amused - by the coloured falsities that a even a god had to resort to on the Kurukshetra. I'm sure that's one of the reasons why the RSS and its affiliates have no qualms about using fabricated truths in their glorious march to victory. Modi and Shah are the ideal leaders in this battlefield.

      Delete
  4. Jose D. MaliekalSeptember 28, 2025 at 1:40 PM

    I presume neither Modi nor Shah are Kshatriyas, though pretend to. Be. They want to ksatriyaize the entire Bharatsvsrshs of their imagination. They wish to outwit even Arjuna and even Karna, in this. Kshatram becomes s weapon and vehicle of hate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalSeptember 28, 2025 at 2:33 PM

      You're right. Modi belongs to some OBC, and Hindutva mythology is yet to legitimize its divine origins. Soon our children may read in NCERT history books that Modis were born from Brahma's brain.

      Shah is not even a Hindu. I wonder how NCERT is going to fix that genealogy.

      Delete
  5. Yamini MacLeanSeptember 28, 2025 at 3:21 PM

    Hari Om
    In short, truth is relative to where one stands, with the exception of the immovables: Change is constant, death is inevitable. It is these two factors that permit the philsophy, "this too shall pass." YAM xx

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl
47 comments
Read more

A Man Called Ove

Book Review   Title: A Man Called Ove Author: Fredrik Backman Translation from Swedish: Henning Koch Publisher: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd, London, 2015 Pages: 295   Ove is a grumpy old man. Right in the initial pages of the novel, we are informed that “People said he was bitter. Maybe they were right. He’d never reflected much on it. People also called him ‘anti-social’. Ove assumed this meant he wasn’t overly keen on people. And in this instance he could totally agree with them. More often than not people were out of their minds.” The novel is Ove’s story It is Ove’s grumpiness that makes him a fascinating character for the reader. Grumpiness notwithstanding, Ove has a lot of goodness within. His world is governed by rules, order and routines. He is superhumanly hardworking and honest. He won’t speak about other people even if such silence means the loss of his job and even personal honour. When his colleague Tom steals money and puts the blame squarely...
12 comments
Read more

Writers and Morality

  Dostoevsky Dostoevsky was a compulsive gambler. He also consumed alcohol rather liberally. But he remains one of my favourite novelists of all time. Very few writers have produced novels that surpass the greatness of The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment . This raises a fundamental question: Should we keep a writer’s personal life totally aside while assessing the literary merit of their works? Going a little further with Dostoevsky, his personal vices gave him firsthand experience of despair, guilt, and redemption, which shaped the deep psychological and moral explorations in his novels. Raskolnikov and Ivan Karamazov were all parts of Dostoevksy’s complex personality. In other words, if Dostoevsky was an ideal human being, he wasn’t likely to have produced such great novels. It may also be recalled that most of his greatest works were written under extreme pressure from creditors who kept knocking at his door. If he were not the compulsive gambler that he was, t...
10 comments
Read more

Don Bosco

Don Bosco (16 Aug 1815 - 31 Jan 1888) In Catholic parlance, which flows through my veins in spite of myself, today is the Feast of Don Bosco. My life was both made and unmade by Don Bosco institutions. Any great person can make or break people because of his followers. Religious institutions are the best examples. I’m presenting below an extract from my forthcoming book titled Autumn Shadows to celebrate the Feast of Don Bosco in my own way which is obviously very different from how it is celebrated in his institutions today. Do I feel nostalgic about the Feast? Not at all. I feel relieved. That’s why this celebration. The extract follows. Don Bosco, as Saint John Bosco was popularly known, had a remarkably good system for the education of youth.   He called it ‘preventive system’.   The educators should be ever vigilant so that wrong actions are prevented before they can be committed.   Reason, religion and loving kindness are the three pillars of that syste...
2 comments
Read more

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...
16 comments
Read more