Skip to main content

Whose Rama?



Book Review

Title: Whose Rama? [Malayalam]

Author: T S Syamkumar

Publisher: D C Books, Kerala

Pages: 352


Rama may be an incarnation of God Vishnu, but is he as noble a man [Maryada Purushottam] as he is projected to be by certain sections of Hindus? This is the theme of Dr Syamkumar’s book, written in Malayalam. There is no English translation available yet.

Rama is a creation of the Brahmins, asserts the author of this book. The Ramayana upholds the unjust caste system created by Brahmins for their own wellbeing. Everyone else exists for the sake of the Brahmin wellbeing. If the Kshatriyas are given the role of rulers, it is only because the Brahmins need such men to fight and die for them. Valmiki’s Rama too upheld that unjust system merely because that was his Kshatriya-dharma, allotted by the Brahmins.

One of the many evils that Valmiki’s Rama perpetrates heartlessly is the killing of Shambuka, a boy who belonged to a low caste but chose to become an ascetic. The Shudras were not allowed to become ascetics. Rama goes to Shambuka, who was doing rigorous tapas hanging upside down on a tree branch, and asks him from which yoni (vulva) he was born. No sooner does Rama come to know that the boy is born of “a Shudra yoni” than he beheads him in most ungodly indignation. What was Shambuka’s sin? That he, a Shudra, sought spiritual deliverance! Rama’s heaven is not for all.

Syamkumar’s book illustrates how Rama went out of his way to uphold the unjust and heartless Brahminical system. The answer to the titular question “Whose Rama?” is that Rama belonged to the Brahmins and their system.

Why did Rama kill Vali, Sugriva’s brother? It was his selfishness that drove him to such a dastardly act. Even Vali, a Vanara (ape) possessed far more nobility than Rama. There was no need for Rama to use such deception to kill him, the dying Vali tells Rama. What was Vali’s crime anyway? That he married his brother’s wife. Ironically, Sugriva does just that after Vali’s death; he marries Vali’s wife with Rama’s blessings. What dharma did Rama uphold then?

Syamkumar also asserts that these creatures who are portrayed as Vanaras (apes) were in fact the Adivasis of the Vindhyas and central India. The Brahmins didn’t even grant them the status of being human.

The way Rama treated Sita in the end also shows Rama as subhuman, according to the author. He emerges as a neurotic who doubted his wife’s chastity and hence subjected her to all sorts of tests including repeated fire tests. Women aren’t given much respect in Rama’s kingdom. They are expected to be their husbands’ slaves, who should be willing to burn themselves on their husbands’ funeral pyres.

Syamkumar finds it appropriate that today a lot of Hindus shout Jai Sri Ram as they go about killing people in mob violence. Rama was the personification of heartless injustice. So why not kill present-day Shambukas and Valis in his name? Valmiki’s Rama stands diametrically opposed to all the ideals presented in the Preamble to modern India’s Constitution: secularism, equality, fraternity… So it was only apt that a gigantic temple was constructed for this deity in his supposed birthplace of Ayodhya.

This book is a scathing critique of Valmiki’s Rama and his legacy which today’s rulers of India supposedly uphold. Rama is not everyone’s God. He protected the interests of a tiny minority. He seems to continue to do just that today too.

T S Syamkumar is a scholar of Sanskrit literature which he has been teaching for years now. He has also been conferred many awards for his scholarly studies.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Liz A.September 6, 2025 at 8:58 AM

    You've really been reading the deep books lately. Or maybe always?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalSeptember 6, 2025 at 5:57 PM

      Generally, I go for serious books. If you stumble upon my reviews of light books, be assured the books were free review copies.

      Delete
  2. Yamini MacLeanSeptember 6, 2025 at 3:35 PM

    Hari Om
    A book with which I might take issue; it is not that one cannot question the whys and wherefores - indeed, I believe that is what such tales are there for, to make us think deeply and decide where we stand - but if one becomes as vehement as your review suggests, one falls into exactly the same category of neuroticisim, vitriol and diatribe one seeks to oppose. This serves no purpose other than to fuel division. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalSeptember 6, 2025 at 7:04 PM

      Is it the book that you should have issue with, Yam? Or is it the political system that has become murderously oppressive for certain sections of citizens?

      I agree that the book is reactionary. I took a whole month to review this. I wondered whether I should review it at all. But I went for it in the end because I realised that a man who has been a victim of a system for generations has a right to be a reactionary. Psychological right to rebel, to let out steam, especially in a political system run by crooks and murderers.

      Jai Sri Ram!

      Delete
    2. Tomichan MatheikalSeptember 7, 2025 at 8:39 AM

      No, not reactionary, wrong word... Rebellious, almost like an angry adolescent. But that anger is justified.

      Delete
  3. Jose D. MaliekalSeptember 6, 2025 at 4:50 PM

    We tend to make the Avataras all Divine, as if they were not huand should mans.. Who knows, Valmiki wished his Ramsyana to.be read afresh, for each age, with the blend of Divinity snd Humanity, with all its flaws and Achilles heels... What is perhaps, heresy, as in Christianity is to negate one or the other dimension. As the Feminists do, we could apply a Hermeneutics of Suspicion, especially when start feeling a ' grain in the shoe, 'as we read any text, especially our scriptutes, craftee in the Patriarchal mould, hue and shade

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalSeptember 6, 2025 at 7:09 PM

      Ma nishada... The opening lines of the epic that's supposed to be all about compassion. What I presented in this review is not even a tip of the iceberg that the book offers to the reader. Rama is a villain in the book. I restrained myself while reviewing the book. But your comment as well as Yamini's above makes me think that I should have been more candid with it. Rama doesn't deserve all this expedient greatness.

      I won't say that Syamkumar's book is great. But it deserves to be read especially today when India is being fed with Modiesque balderdash. Look at the latest film The Bengal Files, for example. And that sh1t will be given Bharat Ratna soon!

      Delete
  4. Jose D. MaliekalSeptember 6, 2025 at 8:19 PM

    Not at all. On the contrary. I was only trying to provide an Epistemological and a Hermeneutical Framework, both for the author and the reviewer, to engage themselves in applying the tools of Hermeneutics of Suspicion and Deconstruction, to the person of Rama as a construct.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl
47 comments
Read more

Insecurity and Exclusivism

“ Hindu khatare mein hai.” This was one of the first slogans that accompanied the emergence of Narendra Modi on the national scene. It means Hindus are in Danger . It reveals a deep-rooted feeling of insecurity. Hindus constitute an overwhelming majority in India – 80%. All the high positions in governance, judiciary, academics, any significant place, are occupied by Hindus. Yet the slogan was born. Strange? It will be facile to argue that Modi used this slogan and its concomitant hatred of Muslims and Christians as a political weapon for winning votes. True, he was successful in that; he rose to the highest political post in the country using minority-bashing. But the hatred did not end with that achievement; rather it spread outward and became more exclusive. Muslim and European rulers of India were booted out from the country’s history books and wherever else possible like the names of roads and institutions. With vengeance. Now there is a concerted effort going on to place In...
12 comments
Read more

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...
16 comments
Read more

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...
19 comments
Read more

You Don’t Know the Sky

I asked the bird to lend me wings. I longed to fly like her. Gracefully. She tilted her head and said, “Wings won’t be of any use to you because you don’t know the sky.” And she flew away. Into the sky. For a moment, I was offended. What arrogance! Does she think she owns the sky? As I watched the bird soar effortlessly into the blue vastness, I began to see what she meant. I wanted wings, not the flight. Like wanting freedom without the responsibility that comes with it. The bird had earned her wings. Through storms, through hunger, through braving the odds. She manoeuvred her way among the missiles that flew between invisible borders erected by us humans. She witnessed the macabre dance of death that brought down cities, laid waste a whole country. Wings are about more than flights. How often have you perched on the stump of a massive tree brought down by a falling warhead and wept looking at the debris of civilisations? The language of the sky is different from tha...
13 comments
Read more