Skip to main content

Jesus Crucified


Christians all over the world are entering the Holy Week, a week dedicated to the commemoration of the last days of Jesus which led to his crucifixion and the putative resurrection.  Though I lost my religious faith three decades ago my interest in Jesus has refused to make a clean exit from my consciousness.  Probably my debilitatingly conservative Catholic upbringing has nailed Jesus too fast to my consciousness.
Who was Jesus in reality?  This is a question that has fascinated me much.  I don’t believe he was the son of God.  I don’t believe there is any God up there or anywhere else begetting sons or daughters or any other miserable creatures.  I find it quite interesting that we, the human beings, who have explored the minute world of the subatomic particles and the stars billions of kilometres away, have not been able to discover much about a person who lived merely 2000 years ago. 

Did he exist at all?  I remember a book which was quite a craze among a few of my classmates in school, a Malayalam book with a provocative title Christ and Krishna did not Exist (by Joseph Edamaruku if I’m not mistaken).  In those days my faith in Jesus the son of God was as absolute as it was blind and could not be shaken by any book.  

It took me many years to search history for evidence of Jesus’ existence.  There’s very little that history can give us.  There are a handful of sources in history that mention Jesus and that too very briefly and even obliquely: Josephus, Roman-Jewish historian; Tacitus, Roman historian; and the Babylonian Talmud are the noteworthy ones.

The Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS) discovered in 1947 created more controversy than foolproof evidences about Jesus.  Nevertheless, I think a short journey through the DSS will be infinitely more worthwhile than all the Ways of the Cross that the devout Christians will be pursuing in the Holy Week. 

A lot of research has gone into the DSS.  Some researchers like Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh have even alleged (in their book, The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception) that the Catholic Church manipulated the research in order to hide certain unpleasant truths about Jesus. 
 
Before we speak about the DSS it is necessary to know that there were many groups or communities among the Jews in the days of Jesus such as the Pharisees, the Sadducees and the Essenes.  While Pharisees and Sadducees are mentioned in many places in the Bible, the Essenes find ample mention in more historical sources such as Pliny, Philo and Josephus.  Pliny in his Natural History depicts the Essenes as “celibate hermits, residing, with ‘only palm-trees for company’, in an area that might be construed as Qumran” (Baigent & Leigh).  Josephus, who is echoed by Philo, mentions that there are two kinds of Essenes: celibates and non-celibates.  The Essenes despise pleasure and wealth.  They hold all possessions in common.  They might have been living in the Qumran caves near the Dead Sea.
 
The DSS must have been written by the Essenes or at least preserved by them.

Most researchers of the Scrolls agree on a few points.  They are:

1.      The scrolls are all written by Jews.

2.      The scrolls date prior to 68 or 69 CE, when the Qumran settlement where the scrolls were discovered, was probably destroyed by Romans during the Jewish revolt.

3.      The oldest scroll dates back to 3rd century BCE, about a century before the Qumran community was established.

4.      The Qumran community was established in the middle of the 2nd century BCE by a group of priests expelled from Jerusalem Temple, led by the one who is referred to in the DSS as The Teacher of Righteousness.

5.      The ruling high priest of the Temple was the archenemy of the community.  Probably the names “Wicked Priest” and “Liar” used in the DSS refers to the high priest.

6.      The Qumran community believed that the Holy Spirit had left the Temple and now dwelt with the community.

Baigent & Leigh are of the view that The Teacher of Righteousness is not Jesus but his brother James.  The Wicked Priest is Ananias, the high priest of the Sadducees, and the Liar is Paul.  Reading Baigent & Leigh is like reading a suspense thriller.  After the crucifixion of Jesus, his brother James became the leader of the Christian community which was not at all pleased with the teachings of Paul who infused Jesus’ messages with Greek philosophy.  Baigent & Leigh bring a lot of evidences from both the Scrolls and the Bible (especially the Acts and Paul’s letters) to show that Paul was an outsider to the early Christian community led by James.  No wonder why Paul became “the Apostle of the Gentiles”. 

Barbara Thiering, historian and Biblical exegete of University of Sydney, studied the DSS in detail before producing in 1990 a TV documentary titled ‘The Riddle of the Dead Sea Scrolls’.  According to her, Jesus was born and raised in Qumran.  He was the son of an Essene.  He became one of the leaders of the Qumran community along with John the Baptist.  In 29 CE Jesus turned against the community, rejected their legalism as well as the ritual of baptism.  He did not advocate the asceticism of the community either.

Thiering argues that Jesus came to be viewed as the Wicked Priest and Liar by the Qumran community.  John the Baptist is The Teacher of Righteousness, according to this interpretation.  Thiering also argues that Jesus did not perform miracles.  Lazarus whom Jesus is portrayed as resurrecting from death in the Bible was only a spiritually dead person whom Jesus ‘resurrects’ psychologically or spiritually.  Thiering’s view on Jesus’ crucifixion may scandalise the devout.  She says that Jesus did not die on the cross but only fainted and was brought back to health by his followers and he lived in a monastery. 

In short, even the Dead Sea Scrolls have not thrown enough light on the life of Jesus.  My interest in him continues.  No ritual of any Holy Week will be able to quench the thirst of the Jesus that my parents along with the priests and nuns of the Catholic church have nailed to my consciousness.

 

The sources of my information:

1.      The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, Arrow Books, 2006


3.      The Dead Sea Scrolls and the New Testament by Mark M. Mattinson

Comments

  1. Easter greetings to you and all your loved ones.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What a coincidence, I spotted your post when I was telling my husband about 'Shroud of Turin' controversy.

    We will perhaps never be able to know the truth behind religious controversies, because facts have been inseparably entwined with myth. The deeper we dig in, the deeper they recede.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is also possible that certain vested interests in organised religions don't want the truth to be revealed. The God of the myth is more valuable for any religion than the truths of history.

      Delete
  3. Truth can't be nailed permanently. Also the suspicions about the truth. It is perfectly justifiable. Research with human wisdom is worthless and can be equated with the boy on the seashore counting the waves. Yes, there will be a satisfaction of challenging the mystery. The Word is powerful! Everything else is meaningless!

    ReplyDelete
  4. What other wisdom than human wisdom is available to man? If you mean, divine revelation ('The Word' implies that), I'm sorry I won't accept it. What is divine wisdom or revelation? Hasn't that done enough harm already?

    ReplyDelete
  5. What I understand from the post (obviously wrong) is that you are looking neither for the historical nor for the mythological Jesus. What you may be in search of is the history of the times that man lived, merely to understand that period. As far as I am concerned this is the only context that will make your search meaningful.

    Sorry for being arrogant enough to tell you what you are searching for.

    RE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jesus is likely to remain a distant dream for people like me simply because his contemporary history didn't take him seriously. But he comes alive to people like me again in various other ways. This post is an example. My search for Jesus is more a psychological exercise than anything else.

      Delete
  6. Beautiful discussion on a man , so much has been said, done and manipulated by all.


    At my age I wonder, whether I need to question whether he was there 2000 years ago, or simply accept the goodness of a man , who is giving solace to many .

    A great post as usual.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...