Skip to main content

Sambhavami Yuge Yuge


 
“The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.”  The realization dawned upon the Biblical God pretty early (Genesis 6: 5).  It didn’t take too many generations down from Adam and Eve for God to come to the regret that “he had made man on the earth” (6: 6).   So God decided to “blot out man whom I have created from the face of the ground, man and beast and creeping things and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them.” 
Gods are not known for rationality, whatever their religion.  The Biblical God is as whimsical as any counterpart of his.  Having condemned the creatures as unworthy of existence and fit only to be drowned in a deluge, God decides to save Noah and his family as well as “seven pairs of all clean animals, the male and his mate; and a pair of the animals that are not clean, the male and his mate; and seven pairs of the birds of the air also, male and female, to keep their kind alive upon the face of all the earth.”  (7: 2-3; emphasis added)

Was God implementing some population control strategy rather than purifying the earth of “wickedness”? 
The Biblical God is not alone in rushing to such a whimsical condemnation of man.  A similar flood had befallen the people of the ancient India much before the Bible was written.  According the Indian Puranic accounts, the earth was ruled by the Manus, of which the first was Manu Swayambhu who was born directly of the god Brahma, even as Adam was later created directly by the Biblical God.  In the time of the seventh Manu came the Indian deluge.  Manu was warned of the flood by god Vishnu who told him “to build a boat to carry his family and the seven sages of antiquity.  Vishnu took the form of a large fish, the boat was fastened to its horn and it swam through the flood until the boat was lodged on a mountain peak.” (Romila Thapar, The Penguin History of Early India)

Noah’s ship was lodged on another mountain peak.  Noah and Manu became latter day Adams, forefathers of a race of creatures who failed to learn any lesson from the deluge meant to disinfect their souls.
Both the Indian and the Biblical floods might have been nostalgic reproductions of an earlier flood that attempted a similar purification of the human soul during the Mesopotamian civilisation.  Ziusudra, king of Shuruppak (ancient Sumerian city), managed to save himself from the flood by taking flight on a huge boat.  The whole of mankind was destroyed in the flood except Ziusudra who had won the favour of a god.  Mankind and other living things were re-created again.

The Gilgamesh epic of the Mesopotamian period tells the story of yet another deluge according to which Utnapishtim survived cosmic destruction by heeding the divine instruction to build an ark.
Three different civilisations envisaged the destruction of the entire human race so that a better race would be born.  Man’s longing for a better world, a world without evil, is very deep-rooted indeed.

Interestingly, man looks forward to some external force – particularly a divine action – to bring about the ritual deluge.  In the Indian mythology, we have made god Vishnu take ten avatars in order to rid the world of some evil or the other and are still waiting for the final one to come and put an end to all the wickedness that we keep amassing day after day.
Sambhavami yuge yuge.  We want some god to come again and again and do the cleaning act for us.  Didn’t the gods do whatever they could in the past?  And ended up, each time, with a world that became more wicked?  Gods are helpless because it is only man who can cleanse his own soul.

As long as we keep imagining that some god or another will come to give us a better world, as long as we only keep praying and offering aaratis, as long as we believe that redemption is a religious affair, we will be condemned to live in a world governed by the darkness of illusions.

 

PS.  This post is dedicated to the seven year-old girl in Delhi who became the latest victim of human illusions.

Comments

  1. ‘’As long as we keep imagining that some god or another will come to give us a better world, as long as we only keep praying and offering aaratis, as long as we believe that redemption is a religious affair, we will be condemned to live in a world governed by the darkness of illusions.‘’

    You are very right; that is why whenever somebody mentions about god, his greatness, manu avathaar etc,I get a nauseating feeling,

    good thinking

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What else can gods do, Prasanna, than nauseate us? At best they can delude us!

      Delete
  2. God helps those who help themselves.. That's why we don't get helped anymore.. Good read.. Good thinking..

    ReplyDelete
  3. Some observations and comments:

    1. "Gods are helpless because it is only man who can cleanse his own soul." - Sorry, it would read better as "Gods are helpless because it is only man who can cleanse Their (Gods') souls." :) It is God who needs salvation, and not man through God.

    2. "Man’s longing for a better world, a world without evil, is very deep-rooted indeed." - Maybe, but it has never been decided what is "evil" - one God's evil is another God's virtue.:) Can religions ever align themselves to each other, beyond platitudes? Or, is it that platitudes define what is good and what is evil?

    3. "as long as we believe that redemption is a religious affair," - Sorry. "redemption" cannot be anything but a religious affair. This is a non-starter as far as ridding oneself of condemnation.

    4. "Romila Thapar, The Penguin History of Early India" - did you not know that quoting her is like waving a red flag at the raging bull :) She occupies the pantheon of "Red flags" along with Noam Chomsky, Arundati Roy, Richard Dawkins and a few others.

    5. Your citing different versions and sources of the flood story is short of perspective. They do not denote human being's intensifying "longing". Rather, they are evidence of the story-tellers penchant for plagiarism!

    6. The God who had regretted making man had also endorsed that all His creations, including the Tree of Knowledge and the Serpent as good! What kind of a fickle mind did He have?

    I will stop at the above half dozen.

    RE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Raghuram, for the interesting observations. Yes, there's much plagiarism in religions. In fact, Romila Thopar mentions in her book which I've quoted that the Mesopotamian story must have been shared by others because of historical links among those people...

      Perhaps, gods can provide us more fun than the fundamentalists and terrorists allow them.

      Delete
  4. Plagiarism I agree, may be it supports a theory this literature proliferated from single civilization that broke up and travelled far and wide to settled at different places. Or may be later travellers carried these stories. But at the end of it is all a fragment of rich human imagination and certainly nothing to do with GOD.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was only speaking facetiously when I mentioned plagiarism. It's more about the historical links between civilizations than about plagiarism, according to me. Romila Thapar is of the opinion that the Indian sources must have got the story from Harappan sources which in turn must have derived it from the Mesopotamian sources.

      Delete
    2. Matheikal, why be so defensive? In my office if I want to make a point referring to an adage in Tamil, I invariably start with a disclaimer, "you must have something parallel in Hindi / Bengali ..." When plagiarism is used in a generic sense as it was in my comment, the copyist goes unidentified. The implied point was that one man's imagination spawns beyond one's own culture. It is IRRELEVANT who copied from whom in this context, only acknowledge the diffusion of ideas in the remote past.

      One another obvious instance of "plagiarism" - waters of River Yamuna giving way to Vasudev as he crossed it with Lord Krishna and Moses crossing the Red Sea along with the tribes of Israel. Who plagiarised from whom? Can the story of Lord Krishna stand without this myth? Likewise can the story of Jews getting to their Promised Land stand without the Red Sea parting? Myths are the foundations of religions, even the most non-religious of them, Buddhism - Jataka tales.

      By the way, without the flood myth or other myths, none of the religions can make a historical connect with the past, except through ancestors, another myth. God will be set aside without the myths. "certainly nothing to do with God" is too flippant for my taste.

      RE

      Delete
    3. none of the religions can make a historical connect with the past, except through ancestors, another myth
      well observed.
      intersting post

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...