Skip to main content

Sambhavami Yuge Yuge


 
“The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.”  The realization dawned upon the Biblical God pretty early (Genesis 6: 5).  It didn’t take too many generations down from Adam and Eve for God to come to the regret that “he had made man on the earth” (6: 6).   So God decided to “blot out man whom I have created from the face of the ground, man and beast and creeping things and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them.” 
Gods are not known for rationality, whatever their religion.  The Biblical God is as whimsical as any counterpart of his.  Having condemned the creatures as unworthy of existence and fit only to be drowned in a deluge, God decides to save Noah and his family as well as “seven pairs of all clean animals, the male and his mate; and a pair of the animals that are not clean, the male and his mate; and seven pairs of the birds of the air also, male and female, to keep their kind alive upon the face of all the earth.”  (7: 2-3; emphasis added)

Was God implementing some population control strategy rather than purifying the earth of “wickedness”? 
The Biblical God is not alone in rushing to such a whimsical condemnation of man.  A similar flood had befallen the people of the ancient India much before the Bible was written.  According the Indian Puranic accounts, the earth was ruled by the Manus, of which the first was Manu Swayambhu who was born directly of the god Brahma, even as Adam was later created directly by the Biblical God.  In the time of the seventh Manu came the Indian deluge.  Manu was warned of the flood by god Vishnu who told him “to build a boat to carry his family and the seven sages of antiquity.  Vishnu took the form of a large fish, the boat was fastened to its horn and it swam through the flood until the boat was lodged on a mountain peak.” (Romila Thapar, The Penguin History of Early India)

Noah’s ship was lodged on another mountain peak.  Noah and Manu became latter day Adams, forefathers of a race of creatures who failed to learn any lesson from the deluge meant to disinfect their souls.
Both the Indian and the Biblical floods might have been nostalgic reproductions of an earlier flood that attempted a similar purification of the human soul during the Mesopotamian civilisation.  Ziusudra, king of Shuruppak (ancient Sumerian city), managed to save himself from the flood by taking flight on a huge boat.  The whole of mankind was destroyed in the flood except Ziusudra who had won the favour of a god.  Mankind and other living things were re-created again.

The Gilgamesh epic of the Mesopotamian period tells the story of yet another deluge according to which Utnapishtim survived cosmic destruction by heeding the divine instruction to build an ark.
Three different civilisations envisaged the destruction of the entire human race so that a better race would be born.  Man’s longing for a better world, a world without evil, is very deep-rooted indeed.

Interestingly, man looks forward to some external force – particularly a divine action – to bring about the ritual deluge.  In the Indian mythology, we have made god Vishnu take ten avatars in order to rid the world of some evil or the other and are still waiting for the final one to come and put an end to all the wickedness that we keep amassing day after day.
Sambhavami yuge yuge.  We want some god to come again and again and do the cleaning act for us.  Didn’t the gods do whatever they could in the past?  And ended up, each time, with a world that became more wicked?  Gods are helpless because it is only man who can cleanse his own soul.

As long as we keep imagining that some god or another will come to give us a better world, as long as we only keep praying and offering aaratis, as long as we believe that redemption is a religious affair, we will be condemned to live in a world governed by the darkness of illusions.

 

PS.  This post is dedicated to the seven year-old girl in Delhi who became the latest victim of human illusions.

Comments

  1. ‘’As long as we keep imagining that some god or another will come to give us a better world, as long as we only keep praying and offering aaratis, as long as we believe that redemption is a religious affair, we will be condemned to live in a world governed by the darkness of illusions.‘’

    You are very right; that is why whenever somebody mentions about god, his greatness, manu avathaar etc,I get a nauseating feeling,

    good thinking

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What else can gods do, Prasanna, than nauseate us? At best they can delude us!

      Delete
  2. God helps those who help themselves.. That's why we don't get helped anymore.. Good read.. Good thinking..

    ReplyDelete
  3. Some observations and comments:

    1. "Gods are helpless because it is only man who can cleanse his own soul." - Sorry, it would read better as "Gods are helpless because it is only man who can cleanse Their (Gods') souls." :) It is God who needs salvation, and not man through God.

    2. "Man’s longing for a better world, a world without evil, is very deep-rooted indeed." - Maybe, but it has never been decided what is "evil" - one God's evil is another God's virtue.:) Can religions ever align themselves to each other, beyond platitudes? Or, is it that platitudes define what is good and what is evil?

    3. "as long as we believe that redemption is a religious affair," - Sorry. "redemption" cannot be anything but a religious affair. This is a non-starter as far as ridding oneself of condemnation.

    4. "Romila Thapar, The Penguin History of Early India" - did you not know that quoting her is like waving a red flag at the raging bull :) She occupies the pantheon of "Red flags" along with Noam Chomsky, Arundati Roy, Richard Dawkins and a few others.

    5. Your citing different versions and sources of the flood story is short of perspective. They do not denote human being's intensifying "longing". Rather, they are evidence of the story-tellers penchant for plagiarism!

    6. The God who had regretted making man had also endorsed that all His creations, including the Tree of Knowledge and the Serpent as good! What kind of a fickle mind did He have?

    I will stop at the above half dozen.

    RE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Raghuram, for the interesting observations. Yes, there's much plagiarism in religions. In fact, Romila Thopar mentions in her book which I've quoted that the Mesopotamian story must have been shared by others because of historical links among those people...

      Perhaps, gods can provide us more fun than the fundamentalists and terrorists allow them.

      Delete
  4. Plagiarism I agree, may be it supports a theory this literature proliferated from single civilization that broke up and travelled far and wide to settled at different places. Or may be later travellers carried these stories. But at the end of it is all a fragment of rich human imagination and certainly nothing to do with GOD.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was only speaking facetiously when I mentioned plagiarism. It's more about the historical links between civilizations than about plagiarism, according to me. Romila Thapar is of the opinion that the Indian sources must have got the story from Harappan sources which in turn must have derived it from the Mesopotamian sources.

      Delete
    2. Matheikal, why be so defensive? In my office if I want to make a point referring to an adage in Tamil, I invariably start with a disclaimer, "you must have something parallel in Hindi / Bengali ..." When plagiarism is used in a generic sense as it was in my comment, the copyist goes unidentified. The implied point was that one man's imagination spawns beyond one's own culture. It is IRRELEVANT who copied from whom in this context, only acknowledge the diffusion of ideas in the remote past.

      One another obvious instance of "plagiarism" - waters of River Yamuna giving way to Vasudev as he crossed it with Lord Krishna and Moses crossing the Red Sea along with the tribes of Israel. Who plagiarised from whom? Can the story of Lord Krishna stand without this myth? Likewise can the story of Jews getting to their Promised Land stand without the Red Sea parting? Myths are the foundations of religions, even the most non-religious of them, Buddhism - Jataka tales.

      By the way, without the flood myth or other myths, none of the religions can make a historical connect with the past, except through ancestors, another myth. God will be set aside without the myths. "certainly nothing to do with God" is too flippant for my taste.

      RE

      Delete
    3. none of the religions can make a historical connect with the past, except through ancestors, another myth
      well observed.
      intersting post

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ivan the unusual friend

When you are down and out, you will find that people are of two types. One is the kind that will walk away from you because now you are no good. They will pretend that you don’t exist. They don’t see you even if you happen to land right in front of them. The other is the sort that will have much fun at your expense. They will crack jokes about you even to you or preach at you or pray over you. This latter people are usually pretty happy that you are broke. You make them feel more comfortable with themselves even to the point of self-righteousness. Ivan was an exception. When I slipped on the path of life and started a free fall that would last many years before I hit the bottom without a thud but with enormous anguish, Ivan stood by me for some reason of his own. He didn’t display any affection which probably he didn’t have. He didn’t display any dislike either. There was no question of preaching or praying. No jokes either. Ivan was my colleague for a brief period at St Joseph’s

Machiavelli the Reverend

Let us go today , you and I, through certain miasmic streets. Nothing will be quite clear along our way because this journey is through some delusions and illusions. You will meet people wearing holy robes and talking about morality and virtues. Some of them will claim to be god’s men and some will make taller claims. Some of them are just amorphous. Invisible. But omnipotent. You can feel their power around you. On you. Oppressing you. Stifling you. Reverend Machiavelli is one such oppressive power. You will meet Franz Kafka somewhere along the way. Joseph K’s ghost will pass by. Remember Joseph K who was arrested one fine morning for a crime that nobody knew anything about? Neither Joseph nor the men who arrest him know why Joseph K is arrested. The power that keeps Joseph K under arrest is invisible. He cannot get answers to his valid questions from the visible agents of that power. He cannot explain himself to that power. Finally, he is taken to a quarry outside the town wher

Joe the tenacious friend

AI-generated illustration You outgrow certain friendships because life changes you in ways that nobody, including you, had expected. Joe is one such friend of mine who was very dear to me once. That friendship cannot be sustained anymore because I am no more the person whom Joe knew and loved to amble along with. And Joe seems incapable of understanding the fact that people can change substantially. Joe and I were supposed to meet one of these days after a gap of more than two decades. I scuttled the meeting rather heartlessly. Just because Joe’s last messages carried words that smacked of intimacy. My life has gone through so much devastating fire that the delicate warmth of intimacy has become repulsive. Joe was a good friend of mine while we were in Shillong. He was a post-graduate student and a part-time schoolteacher when I met him first. I was a fulltime schoolteacher teaching math and science to ninth and tenth graders. My dream was to postgraduate in English literature an

Kailasnath the Paradox

AI-generated illustration It wasn’t easy to discern whether he was a friend or merely an amused onlooker. He was my colleague at the college, though from another department. When my life had entered a slippery slope because of certain unresolved psychological problems, he didn’t choose to shun me as most others did. However, when he did condescend to join me in the college canteen sipping tea and smoking a cigarette, I wasn’t ever sure whether he was befriending me or mocking me. Kailasnath was a bundle of paradoxes. He appeared to be an alpha male, so self-assured and lord of all that he surveyed. Yet if you cared to observe deeply, you would find too many chinks in his armour. Beneath all those domineering words and gestures lay ample signs of frailty. The tall, elegantly slim and precisely erect stature would draw anyone’s attention quickly. Kailasnath was always attractively dressed though never unduly stylish. Everything about him exuded an air of chic confidence. But the wa

Levin the good shepherd

AI-generated image The lost sheep and its redeemer form a pet motif in Christianity. Jesus portrayed himself as a good shepherd many times. He said that the good shepherd will leave his 99 sheep in order to bring the lost sheep back to the fold. When he finds the lost sheep, the shepherd is happier about that one sheep than about the 99, Jesus claimed. He was speaking metaphorically. The lost sheep is the sinner in Jesus’ parable. Sin is a departure from the ‘right’ way. Angels raise a toast in heaven whenever a sinner returns to the ‘right’ path [Luke 15:10]. A lot of Catholic priests I know carry some sort of a Redeemer complex in their souls. They love the sinner so much that they cannot rest until they make the angels of God run for their cups of joy. I have also been fortunate to have one such priest-friend whom I shall call Levin in this post. He has befriended me right from the year 1976 when I was a blundering adolescent and he was just one year older than me. He possesse