Fiction
Paras
is a bundle of paradoxes. “East is East
and West is West, and never the twain shall meet,” he believes firmly, choosing
to ignore the fact that it was said by somebody from the West. Paras believes that the East and the West have
their own diametrically opposed civilisations, though he has no qualms about
wearing Western dress all the time, the necktie included.
The
East is mystical and mythical while the West is rational and scientific, Paras argues. And the mysticism and mythology of the East
are superior to the science and technology of the West. But Paras would not live without his beloved
laptop and the latest version of the mobile phone.
Centuries
before the Westerner formulated the mathematical identity, infinity minus infinity equals infinity, Indian mysticism had
formulated it, argues Paras. “Look at
Brihadaranyka Upanishad, for example. It
says, ‘Poornamata, poornamitam...’
That is, infinity here, infinity there;
take away infinity from infinity and infinity remains.”
“Even
the zero was a discovery of Indian mysticism,” he avers. “We use the word soonya for zero, indicating the mystical worth of emptiness.”
But
Paras can never think of living in emptiness of any sort. He loves to have as many things as possible
around him. A fleet of cars in front of
the house, all the available amenities and gadgets inside the house.
He
has a lot of pet theories too. For
example, “all revolutionary bursts of genius took place in the first decade of
the century.” Paras goes on to explain, “Whether
it is literature or sculpture, architecture or physical sciences, major
breakthroughs came in the first decade of a century. Dante began his Inferno in 1302 soon after the poet’s banishment from
Florence. Michelangelo carved his David from a single block of marble in
1501. Cervantes’s Don Quixote tilted at
his first windmill in 1604. Beethoven’s
greatest symphonies were composed in the first decade of the 19th
century. Einstein propounded his theory
of relativity in 1905...”
“The
computer and the internet did not come in the first decade of any century,” I
dared to point out.
“The
revolutionary changes in those sciences came in the first decade of the 21st
century,” Paras asserted.
I
didn’t point out that all his examples came from the West although he upheld
the superiority of Eastern mysticism and mythology. I knew he would deliver a protracted
discourse on the relative superiority of mysticism and mythology over prosaic
science and technology.
When
his son studying at Harvard told him over the phone that he was going to marry
an American friend of his, Paras said, “Divorces are more common than marriages
in that country.” What he meant was that
his son would eventually find his permanent partner in the land of mysticism
and mythology, after divorcing his wife from the other land.
“Which
would you like really to happen?” I ventured to ask. “Your belief coming true or your son living a
happy married life?”
“Well,
my son’s singular case won’t alter history, will it?”
I
grinned.
people have their own beliefs and they will hold on to it, no matter how irrational it might be!
ReplyDeleteI have noticed that most people, including me, are such bundles of paradoxes - only the degrees vary!
Deletesometime i think irrational beliefs make us more rational over after some time !
ReplyDelete"Sometimes" they do, Ankur. But most of the times, people die clinging to their petty pet theories and make other people's lives miserable with them too... If we cultivate a sense of humour we can have hearty laughs listening to such people speak. That's what I choose to do.
DeleteHe he, very wonderful contrast you have created throughout the entire piece and the ending is something that couldn't be foreseen and continues to be a worthy conclusion!!
ReplyDeleteGreat post, Sir.
Thank you.
DeleteWithout that ending Paras would have remained merely a bundle of paradoxes. But he is actually not just that!
Paras is a living paradox like so many-nice exploration TM.
ReplyDeleteI'm also a living paradox, Indu. Most people are, I think. But the majority know the difference between para-dox and hypocrisy.
DeleteIf I didn't know that difference, I'd be a Sadhu, Baba, Swami, Priest... what not!
We all are nothing different that Paras, I suppose. Great post
ReplyDeleteYes, Ran, we are not much different. Somewhat different. Otherwise we would be having too many cars in front of our houses!
DeleteI believe in being rational... however.. its not always easy to come out of the mindset engraved in our DNA.
ReplyDeleteI loved this crisp post, sir :)
DNA is the destiny, Namrota.
DeleteAnother great post! Keep them coming!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Ranjana.
DeleteThe life of any theory is ascertained when it comes to practical life.
ReplyDeleteExcellent post. It shares with us a thought about the difference between hypocrisy and paradox. Paradox is a natural human dilemma, I think.
Paradox is inalienable from human existence, at least to some extent. Hypocrisy is tolerable to some extent. We are stunned by certain kinds of hypocrisy displayed by people in high positions.
DeleteI don't know what to think. Absolutely confused :)
ReplyDeleteGlad that I have managed to confuse you :)
Delete