Skip to main content

Development of a different kind


Development is the only mantra today for many Indians, it seems.  Making Mr Narendra Modi the Prime Minister would mean putting India on the magical highway to economic development, they argue.  What they fail to understand is that the kind of development that prevailing economic theories and systems can provide is a highly flawed one. 
It is good to look back at some classical notions when confronted with crises.  Mahatma Gandhi had some very illuminating views on development.  All of his views may not be relevant in today’s situation and may not be practical either.  Yet it is worth revisiting a few relevant ideas.

Gandhi said: “That you cannot serve God and Mammon is an economic truth of the highest value. Western nations today are groaning under the heel of the monster-god of materialism. Their moral growth has become stunted. They measure their progress in pounds and dollars. American wealth has become the standard. She is the envy of the other nations. I have heard many of our countrymen say that we will gain American wealth but avoid its methods. I venture to suggest that such an attempt if it were made is foredoomed to failure.”

Gandhi also said: “I want the concentration of wealth, not in the hands of the few, but in the hands of all. Today machinery merely helps a few to ride on the backs of millions. The impetus behind it all is not the philanthropy to save labour, but greed. It is against this constitution of things that I am fighting with all my might.”

The views are highly relevant today, decades after they were expressed.  Just a decade back, Dr Fritjof Capra wrote in his book, The Hidden Connections, “The United States projects its tremendous power around the world to maintain optimal conditions for the perpetuation and expansion of production.  The central goal of its vast empire ... is not to expand its territory, nor to promote freedom and democracy, but to make sure that it has global access to natural resources and that markets around the world remain open to its products.  Accordingly, political rhetoric in America moves swiftly from ‘freedom’ to ‘free trade’ and ‘free markets’.  the free flow of capital and goods is equated with the lofty ideal of human freedom, and material acquisition is portrayed as a basic human right, increasingly even as an obligation.” (emphasis added)


The American model of development, which many in India today have bought lock, stock, and barrel, is rooted in plain greed and nothing else.  The antidote is what Gandhi had suggested long ago: fulfil your need and control your greed.  Otherwise we will only create a planet of aggressive people grabbing for more and more, endlessly.  There will be no peace in such a world, no joy.  What’s the point of living without peace and joy?


Top post on IndiBlogger.in, the community of Indian Bloggers


Comments

  1. Very relevant sir .... there is everything for man's need but not for his greed

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gandhi was a visionary, Manish. We've failed to understand him. The west has made schools to study his philosophy but they too don't understand him, it seems.

      Delete
  2. Unfortunately most of the Indian voters are dreaming the 'American dream' where M K Gandhi is outdated. How many of your students in your school would like to follow the path of Gandhi (not in their answer sheets, but in their life)? In fact they would laugh at their 'conservative' parents for talking about the Gandhian 'idealism'!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Sibi, by mistake my response to your comment was posted from my wife's log in id since both of us use the same laptop!

      Yes, you are right, most of my students like other present students in the country do not know the real Gandhi. Whenever I discuss Gandhi in the class, I'm scandalised to hear derogatory opinions about the Mahatma, opinions propagated by today's politicians with vested interests.

      The western Universities are doing a lot of research on Gandhian philosophy. I hope that America will eventually evolve another economic system based on Gandhi's ideals. What America chooses becomes the world's choice. Hence there may be hope yet!

      Delete
  3. Unfortunately most of the Indian voters are dreaming the 'American dream' where M K Gandhi is outdated. How many of your students in your school would like to follow the path of Gandhi (not in their answer sheets, but in their life)? In fact they would laugh at their 'conservative' parents for talking about the Gandhian 'idealism'!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well Mr. Matheikal - we are talking of something that is still theory and has succeeded nowhere in the world.The flawed American model is the best we have seen to date - the other alternative being the non democratic Chinese model. And even if we could create such a hypothetical country, the world won't let us be. ANd last but not the least, out level of politics and governance is way behind even the American model - even getting there is an improvement that our youth aspire for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's why I put my hope in America rather than India as my mentioned in my response to Sibi above. One thing we should admire about America is that they are open to new ideas and views. We are narrow-minded. We cling to antedeluvian ideas under the illusion that we are protecting our culture. America experiments with new ideas. Yes, their vision as of now is highly blinkered. There are fundamentalists there too. Yet they are more rational and scientific in comparison.

      Delete
  5. Very apt for India's context.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Particularly in the context of the election manifesto that came out yesterday :) thank you.

      Delete
  6. Versed Summary on tacit ideology, conclusively what nation needs today is prosperity. Greed for the need that en routes people towards power convention, and then slowly and steadily society forget themselves.
    And I believe the planet you spoke about is already created. What all remains in our hands is our self and our values.. Lets see how long we carry them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Prosperity, yes, Saurabh. But everyone's prosperity, not of a few. I'm glad to see a lot of commentators agree with me directly or indirectly about the need for a change in our approaches and worldview.

      Delete
  7. Very nice post. Development to trickle down to masses is the need of the hour. It needs sacrifices by brave young men & women to leave behind dollar dreams & cush salaries & rather to plunge into spreading the technologies of tomorrow (renewable energy), get in2 implementing rainwater harvesting & water safety measures (tomorrow's wars will b for water) & channelise all those crores into being used for the right purpose...

    Only then can we have true development...sustainable & inclusive....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you mentioned water which is going to be a serious bone of contention soon. Will we start killing one another for water (giving that too a communal colour) or will we start finding alternatives so that we can live together in peace? Just one of the many questions that the coming days will hurl at us.

      Delete
  8. Gandhian philosophy is an ideal one. I cannot question it as at his time, Gandhi had united the divided nation and had made it fight for a common goal. It was something that seemed impossible at that time just as today seems eradicating greed. A friend of mine said that may be there's way to put an end to this culture of corruption and negligence that we are yet to discover. I felt that yes, there could be. May be what we need is a firm believer and a capable leader as Gandhi. Changing every single mind to adopt Gandhian philosophy today, seems somewhat impossible to me. I still wish to find out how Gandhi had made that change.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On the one hand, Gandhi was forthright and he a person of indefatigable integrity. On the other, he lived in a time when people respected truth and truthfulness. Today even Gandhi would have found it a tough job leading India.

      But we don't have many alternatives. The world doesn't, in fact. We have made the planet a heap of rubbish and it's time to start cleaning up the mess. Gandhi can be one of the guiding lights.

      Delete
  9. Sometimes I feel 'Greed' is also a relative term and cannot be classified a negative trait altogether. Many of the inventions we enjoy today evolved due to someone's greed, to conquer the world / achieve the impossible. When someone's greed deprives many others of their rights I think it is evil?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are right, Santhosh. But it all depends how you define terms. The king of greed you mention first is not greed, in fact. It's ambition. Or a quest. There's nothing wrong about it. When ambition crosses the borders and transgresses into the rights and properties of others, it becomes greed and evil.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In this Wonderland

I didn’t write anything in the last few days. Nor did I feel any urge to write. I don’t know if this lack of interest to write is what’s called writer’s block. Or is it simple disenchantment with whatever is happening around me? We’re living in a time that offers much, too much, to writers. The whole world looks like a complex plot for a gigantic epic. The line between truth and fiction has disappeared. Mass murders have become no-news. Animals get more compassion than fellow human beings. Even their excreta are venerated! Folk tales are presented as scientific truths while scientific truths are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. When the young generation in Nepal set fire to their Parliament and Supreme Court buildings, they were making an unmistakable statement: that they are sick of their political leaders and their systems. Is there any country whose leaders don’t sicken their citizens? I’m just wondering. Maybe, there are good leaders still left in a few coun...

Death as a Sculptor

Book Discussion An Introductory Note : This is not a book review but a reflection on one of the many themes in The Infatuations , novel by Javier Marias. If you have any intention of reading the novel, please be forewarned that this post contains spoilers. For my review of the book, without spoilers, read an earlier post: The Infatuations (2013). D eath can reshape the reality for the survivors of the departed. For example, a man’s death can entirely alter the lives of his surviving family members: his wife and children, particularly. That sounds like a cliché. Javier Marias’ novel, The Infatuations , shows us that death can alter a lot more; it can reshape meanings, relationships, and even morality of the people affected by the death. Miguel Deverne is killed by an abnormal man right in the beginning of the novel. It seems like an accidental killing. But it isn’t. There are more people than the apparently insane killer involved in the crime and there are motives which are di...

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

When Cricket Becomes War

Illustration by Copilot Designer Why did India agree to play Pakistan at all if the animosity runs so deep that Indian players could not even extend the customary handshake: a simple ritual that embodies the very essence of sportsmanship? Cricket is not war, in the first place. When a nation turns a game into a war, it does not defeat its rival; it only wages war on its own culture, poisoning its acclaimed greatness. India which claims to be Viswaguru , the world’s Guru, is degenerating itself day after day with mounting hatred against everyone who is not Hindu. How can we forget what India did to a young cricket player named Mohammed Siraj , especially in this context? In the recent test series against England, India achieved an unexpected draw because of Siraj. 1113 balls and 23 wickets. He was instrumental in India’s series-levelling victory in the final Test at the Oval and was declared the Player of the Match. But India did not celebrate him. Instead, it mocked him for his o...

Whose Rama?

Book Review Title: Whose Rama? [Malayalam] Author: T S Syamkumar Publisher: D C Books, Kerala Pages: 352 Rama may be an incarnation of God Vishnu, but is he as noble a man [ Maryada Purushottam ] as he is projected to be by certain sections of Hindus? This is the theme of Dr Syamkumar’s book, written in Malayalam. There is no English translation available yet. Rama is a creation of the Brahmins, asserts the author of this book. The Ramayana upholds the unjust caste system created by Brahmins for their own wellbeing. Everyone else exists for the sake of the Brahmin wellbeing. If the Kshatriyas are given the role of rulers, it is only because the Brahmins need such men to fight and die for them. Valmiki’s Rama too upheld that unjust system merely because that was his Kshatriya-dharma, allotted by the Brahmins. One of the many evils that Valmiki’s Rama perpetrates heartlessly is the killing of Shambuka, a boy who belonged to a low caste but chose to become an ascetic. The...