Skip to main content

Centenary of World War I



Today (July 28) is the centenary of World War I (WWI).  The War started as a family affair and then spread to the whole world because of more family affairs.  Wars are, more often than not, family affairs even today.  We, the human beings, are still as clannish as we were when our forefathers descended from the tree and started feeling ashamed of the groins that gave birth to families.  Shame breeds wars.  Shame is the other side of honour.  

What triggered WWI was the murder of the Austrian archduke Francis Ferdinand.  The year was 1914.  France was already a republic and England was a constitutional monarchy.  The rest of Europe remained conservative monarchies.  But the monarchies were already feeling the fire beneath their bottoms because of what had happened in France and England.  The common man was beginning to assert himself.

It was a common man who shot the archduke Francis Ferdinand.  A common man’s crime could not have triggered a world war. 

Francis Ferdinand was the nephew of the Austrian Emperor Francis Joseph.  Francis Ferdinand was a close friend of Germany’s Kaiser Wilhelm.  Connections.  Relationships.  Politics is all about connections and relationships, whatever illustrious historians may tell us.

But the historians are not all wrong, of course.  How can they be?  They are the scholars who determine for us, the ordinary mortals, what is right and wrong.

Historians are the people who will make a mahatma the villain and a villain the mahatma.  Wait and see how it is going to happen in India in the coming few months.  NCERT is going to rewrite history textbooks.   Just as it did when BJP came to power the last time.

During the WWI, the Prussian field marshal Helmuth von Moltke wrote: “Perpetual peace is a dream, and not even a beautiful dream.  War is part of God’s order.  Without war, the world would stagnate and lose itself in materialism.  In it, Man’s most noble virtues are displayed – courage and self-denial, devotion to duty, willingness to sacrifice oneself, and to risk life itself.

In August 1914, young men in Europe rushed to enlist themselves in the army of their countries.  They wanted to relish the entertainment called war. 

Today, we are told that young men of India are going to the Arab countries to fight against the enemies of Islam.  War is a good entertainment, it seems, even today.

In the olden days, Kings led their soldiers to wars when they were bored of the women and wine in their respective palaces. 

Can we give more entertainment to people and avoid war?  I think it is possible.  But the entertainment has to be more stupid than what we are providing already on the numerous TV channels.  We should give a lot of God on the channels. 

Freedom is something that people can’t understand.  Enslave them with God and spirituality.  Temples and Mosques have failed.  Give them God on TV screens and computer screens.  Make God digital.  Make God a relevant drug. 

WWI marked the final end of absolute monarchies in Europe.  Yet there was another World War just a few decades later.  Why?  Because there were too many people in Germany, the country that was defeated in WWI, who were unemployed.  Too much poverty.  Too much exploitation.  And Germany sought its saviour in Hitler.

Hitlers create wars.  They don't know how to create relevant Gods.


These are some random thoughts of mine on the centenary of WWI.  I’m no historian, no scholar, no strategist.  I am not one of those Israelis who entertain themselves watching their missiles kill hundreds of people in the Gaza strip. I’m not one of those “experts” who are going to rewrite the history of India in the coming days. 

Comments

  1. Really a good article to refresh the old memories of world war.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I was only trying to remind people that wars will never end as long as we keep on fighting clannishly in the name of families, business relationships, and even gods.

      Delete
  2. Nicely written..
    Following your blog ..
    DO visit mine at http://www.ananyatales.com/
    Hope u like it :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm already an occasional visitor at your blog, Ananya.

      Delete
  3. Though a reality, it's disturbing. 'War as entertainment'; can we get more barbaric than this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sadly, we remain barbaric in spite of all the advancement we have made in science and technology. Perhaps, science and tech helped us to kill more people in more ingenious ways.

      Delete
  4. Wars are fought not for entertainment but for survival and till all concerned parties understand the futility of war and conflict,there can never be lasting peace! This is my view.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's one way of looking at war, Nima. Countries need enemies even as people create gods and devils. Even if India tried to foster friendly relationships with Pakistan, they would still maintain the enmity because enemies are essential! India too needs enemies.

      Delete
  5. On of your best post I have read till now..poised yet poignant.. One proof that wars are a sort of entertainment: so many Hollywood movies on war apocalypse..!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Remember how CNN brought live telecast of the Gulf War... Ever since war has been the biggest entertainment! In the olden days, the entertainment was confined to those who participated; today people watch the telecasts and entertain themselves!

      Delete
  6. When 20% of the countries are powered over 80% of the world, what can be expected Tomichand? There are no true democracies that exist. Nice article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That proportion is widening, Shweta. It's now 10:90.

      Delete
  7. Both Good and Evil is necessary to square things in this mundane play.Yes,killing of the Archduke was not the reason for first WW.Colonial wealth simply.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was also about nationalisms and democracy. People were sick of monarchies. People also wanted to establish 'unified' countries on linguistic lines. Wars are quite complicated affairs, really.

      Delete
  8. A nice article, thought provoking. Yes war is the greatest entertainment of all. hatred is the best time pass

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thought provoking piece, this. Second your views on wars and politics, but have a different take on Hitler. When one is dictated upon and ruthlessly pushed to a corner, one is bound to seek revenge, more so if one is someone as ambitious, self-respecting and proud as Hitler. So if we say - Hitlers create wars, it comes with T & Cs attached.

    But then as you pointed out early on in the write-up - 'Historians are the people who will make a mahatma the villain and a villain the mahatma', so going by that, Hitler is a villain indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Forgot to add - Not implying that Hitler was a mahatma. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Germany was in a pathetic state when it idolised Hitler. So Hitler's rise to power can be understood rationally. I also accept your addendum that you don't imply that Hitler was a mahatma. The question that would still remain is whether Germany couldn't find an alternative way which was less gruesome, less brutal... 65 lakh lives is too high a price to pay for anything, to say the least. Such a price is sure to lead to disasters. Hence my assertion that Hitlers create wars.

      Delete
  11. I find it true.. War being the greatest entertainment of the mankind. We create war, we relish war, we think it to be inevitable, put valiance on show, make master plans, create lull, awe, some participate by hiding under the basements and finally the commoners bemoan and cry over the losses. We create war out of nothing. Politics is played upon nothing. How superficial is the ground of our system!

    I agree that perpetual peace is a dream. But if uplifting the making above materialism so specifically demands war, then let humans get doomed into materialism. War destroys, not just people, property but also nature. I don't know if wars are really important or not but I am certainly against them.

    This is an awesome post. And about the NCERT republishing its history book, that's a pity. At least educational system should be left alone by the politics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm happy I could elicit so much from you, Namrata. Your first para reminds me of what philosopher Barrows Dunham said in his book, Man Against Myth, "Except in wartime, we do not produce the enormous quantity of goods which our technology makes possible, and we do not develop our technology as rapidly as we might. In other words, we produce abundantly only when the purpose is destructive. When the purpose is constructive, our economy creaks and clatters to a halt."

      People relish wars at different levels, even as you have noted. How can it be altered? An evolutionary mutation of the human genes - a utopian dream or a distant possibility?

      Regarding textbooks, Gujarat had already done it under Mr Modi.

      Delete
    2. An utopian dream, I would say. It's human nature to enjoy war ( level of severity may vary according to individuals or other factors).

      Delete
  12. When I was very small and didn't know I once prayed in the night saying. Let there be a world war three soon and India should become 1st in the world population wise. When I think of it today, it was innocence that made me ask for it. I was watching movies which run in series and so the demand for the next world war. I wanted to come first in class and wanted the same for my country too. Stupid though I feel now the passion and craze that people have for wars will see this prayer of mine come true.
    Its been a hundred years, already so many wars have taken place, I have my doubts if even digital God and can put an end to this thirst for blood.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...