Communalism
and greed for political power are like iron and magnet. Mohammed Ali Jinnah is a good case study.
Jinnah
returned to India in 1906 having become a Barrister. He was a secular, liberal nationalist then, a
follower of Dadabhai Naoroji. He joined
the Congress and opposed the Muslim League staunchly. Aga Khan, the first president of Muslim
League, called Jinnah “our toughest opponent” and Sarojini Naidu gave him the
title “Ambassador of Hindu-Muslim Unity.”
When
he entered the Central Legislative Council from Bombay as a Muslim member under
the system of separate electorates for Hindus and Muslims, Jinnah became what
historian Bipan Chandra calls “a communal nationalist.” Jinnah was still a member of the Congress but
had stepped on to the slide of communalism.
Once you are on the slide of communalism, the downward motion is quick
and natural.
Yet
as late as 1925, Jinnah could tell a young Muslim who claimed he was a Muslim
first: “My boy, no, you are an Indian first and then a Muslim.” Jinnah was not at all a religious person at
heart. By temperament he was
secular. By faith, he was an
atheist. (V D Savarkar was an atheist
too.) But greed for power made him a communalist. He wanted to be the Prime Minister of
independent India. If not India, then
Pakistan.
In
1937-38, Jinnah understood the real potential of communalism as an easy route
to political power. The liberal
nationalist, the atheist, now started crying that Islam was in danger in
India. “The High Command of the Congress
is determined, absolutely determined, to crush all other communities and
cultures in this country and establish Hindu raj in this country,” declaimed
the atheist-turned-communalist.
The
Hindu communalists did not fail to add fuel to the fire that was being
lit. “We Hindus are (already) reduced to
be veritable helots throughout our land,” proclaimed V D Savarkar in 1938. Soon the RSS Bible, We, was published highlighting the ominous risks run by the “Hindu
National life.”
In
addition to all this mounting hatred and mutual suspicion was the British
desire and policy to “divide and rule.”
Then
there were other vested interests like traders and landlords who found it apt
to use the communal forces to secure their own interests. The Muslim landlords in West Punjab, for
example, had much to gain by supporting the Muslim League. The Hindu zamindars, merchants and
moneylenders in North and West India drifted to Hindu communal parties and
groups for their own interests rather than the nation’s.
Personal
interests are better taken care of when projected as the interests of a community,
if not the nation itself.
Almost
seven decades after we won Independence, we still hear talks of a particular
religious community being in danger in the country and hence the need to
rewrite the history of the country. The Union
education minister has already approached certain historians of a particular
hue for rewriting the history textbooks of NCERT. We are reminded of what happened when the BJP
came to power earlier and Murli Manohar Joshi was the education minister.
Historian
Bipan Chandra said in his classical work, India’s
Struggle for Independence, “The communalists increasingly operated on the
principle: the bigger the lie the better.
They poured venom on the National Congress and Gandhiji...”
How
many national heroes are going to have their faces blackened and how many
theirs whitened by the new histories that will be written, we can wait and
watch. Atheists have fought and killed
for religions and villains have become heroes in the history of our
species.
Good analysis, sir
ReplyDeleteThanks, Abhi. I thought this would invite some sort of a discussion...
DeleteYou are right. Very few people put the interest of the nation above, or even aligned with, their own interest. They are short sighted as a stable nation is the safest environment in which to carry on doing business long term.
ReplyDeleteBut young India is demanding changes, KM. See the way the RSS office in Delhi's Jhandewala was gheraoed yesterday by the youth of Delhi. Young India is moving beyond outdated views.
DeleteGandhi admitted that he could not influence two persons: one was his own son, Harilala Gandhi and another was Jinnah.
ReplyDeleteJinnah and Gandhi were poles apart. The former was an atheist who made use of religion just the way many of our contemporary leaders (including the PM) are doing it. The latter was a staunch believer in Hinduism but who would not use it as a political tool.
DeleteI hate both the leaders Jinnah and Gandhiji for what happened in 1947. Reading your post I understand that this was not something that happened over night it had been brewing for a while. Jinnah was greedy and Gandhiji to whom the country used to listen could have stopped the split. Yet their personal ambitions just pushed them over the line.
ReplyDeleteThis fighting over religion is I guess every Indians pass time.
In retrospect,there is 1 evidence of the genius of Jinnah, which is providentially proven by the Hindoo Nazis.
ReplyDeleteJinnah - is the only sentient,ever,who sensed the evil of the Hindoo and the Indian vermin, and placed it on documentary record.This is inspite of the fact, that he was surrounded by Hindoo liberals and philosophers,and so called liberals.He saw through the mist, for 100 years into the future.
He saw that Nehru and Gandhi would die and be killed soon and the nation of the Hindoos,would be overrun by the Hindoo Nazis,as it was, in 2014.The Dialectics of History !
It is a simple deconstructed fact of history.The largest extermination in Human history was that of the Buddhists and Buddhism - by the Hindoos,and the philosophy of the Hindoo Pope - Adi Shankara and his litter of impotenticas .And Jinnah read history.
The dubious "Indian Muslims" who are basically the lower caste Hindoos,who converted,are numb nuts and dumb shits (still enslaved to upper caste Hindoos) - who believed the secular nation theory,and the bunk of the Ganga-Jamuna-Saraswati Culture ! There are 200 million of these dumb shits ! It is no wonder that these numb nuts did not create a new Pakistan or join Pakistan !
They are lower caste Hindus who tolerated Hindoo evil for 5000 years - with not a single record of insurrection !
Those who left India in 1947 - did not have the "Indian DNA" - they were not the lower caste hindoos who converted to Islam
Even the Prophet of Islam,did not sense the evil of the Hindoo vermin - although there were several Hindoo vermin, in Mecca,then.The Prophet is supposed to have made statements on the cool winds of Hind and the Prophet-hood of Krishna - which are dubious and meaningless Hadeeths.The Hindoo vermin say that Ramadan is Rama-adan and the "Indian Muslims" say that Rama is a Imam ! This is the Harry Potter tale !
Ghazwa-E-Hind is a prophecy of eventuality (like those of Nostradamus) - not a statement of evil !dindooohindoo
Do these "Indian Muslims" deserve doom ? After 80 years of cinderella and Harry Potter tales,the dubious "Indian Muslims" still do not get it ! These fools believe in the Hindoo Constitution and Judiciary !
https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/caa-nrc-may-affect-status-of-indias-muslim-minority-congressional-research-service/article30409109.ece
And Jinnah saw it in 1930-47 ! The man from London ! There was another genius from London - called - Churchill - who said “I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion.”
There is something about London - the air,weather,wine and women !
And Jinnah's example,is w/o any peer in human history - wherein, a warrior,king or saint has made a nation by extricating itself from the pits of evil,sensing evil and documenting evil,and then,being proven right,in a span of 80 years.
Jinnah - the genius - the man's trajectory from wine,pork,cigars,pipes and women to the Qaid !
This is E-V-O-L-U-T-I-O-N !
The 1 flaw in Jinnah - minutae of intellectual discrimination ! Never eat from the hands of a Kaffir or allow the human body to be touched by a kaffir ! He was poisoned by a Hindoo - just like the Prophet was poisoned by a Jew-ess ! dindooohindoo