Skip to main content

Gandhi and Godse


It was a cold morning on 30 Jan 1948.  Nathuram Godse, Narayan Apte and Vishnu Karkare met together once again in Retiring Room number 6 at Old Delhi Railway Station.

Godse had failed in his two earlier attempts to kill Gandhi.  He did not want to fail again.  “Third time success,” he said half jokingly to his friends.

“There will be heavy police guard for Gandhi especially because of the murder attempt just ten days back,” said Godse. 

Godse suggested they should buy an old camera which needed a tripod and a black hood.  He would pose as a photographer and conceal the pistol inside the base of the camera.

“Nobody uses that sort of a camera nowadays,” said Apte.  He dismissed it as “a bad idea.”

“Disguise yourself as a Muslim woman wearing a burqa,” suggested Karkare.  “There are many Muslim women who attend Gandhi’s prayers.  After all, he is their saviour, isn’t he?”  He spat out his hatred.  

“No,” said Godse having put on the burqa that was brought in.  “The folds are a hindrance.  I won’t ever be able to take out the pistol at the right time.”

“Sometimes the simplest ideas are the best,” said Apte when they had wasted almost the whole morning discussing various ideas.  Apte suggested that Godse should wear a greyish military suit which was very commonly used by people those days.  Its design was such that it could conceal a pistol easily.

They went to the Birla temple.  Apte and Karkare offered prayers to the deities for the success of their mission.  Godse did not enter the temple.  When Apte and Karkare returned having offered their obeisance to goddess Kali, they found Godse standing beside a statue of Shivaji.  “I have had my darshan,” he said curtly.

Godse had been convincing himself that he was indeed doing the right thing by killing Gandhi.  Gandhi had blasphemed Hinduism and its gods.  He had made the Hindus weaklings.  He had let the Muslims get away with what they wanted.  Godse could feel hatred surging in his veins.  Murderous hatred.  His grip on the pistol became tight.

None of the three men had imagined that they could gain entry to the Birla House so easily.  There were no guards at the gate.  5.10 pm.  Gandhi was late.  Finally he came supporting himself on the shoulders of Abha and Manu. 

“Namaste, Gandhiji,” said Godse as he stepped right in front of Gandhi.

“Brother,” said Manu, “Bapu is already ten minutes late...”

Godse pushed her aside fiendishly, took out his pistol and fired three times.

“Hey Ram!”

“All those who believe in the brotherhood of men will mourn Gandhi’s death,” said the French Premier, Georges Bidault, on hearing of the assassination.

“India is for the Hindus,” asserted Godse as he awaited his death in the prison.  He could never understand the meaning of concepts like “brotherhood of men”.


Comments

  1. Yes but one cannot truly understand the minds of men even if one understands their ideology

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mind is more complex than the ideology, I admit. But both are related. A compassionate man can never commit a murder and we wouldn't expect an ideology of compassion from a hard-hearted person.

      Delete
  2. Always found Ghodse interesting.
    Interesting post, following you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Godse is interesting for a character study. He is the type with high level ambition but low level resourcefulness. Religion becomes an easy tool for such people. Hatred seeps into their hearts easily.

      Delete
  3. I always wonder at the sick mentality of people like Godse. They don't understand humanity. How can they understand the concept of brotherhood of men?
    Moreover, I wonder at the people who applaud this act. Is killing an unarmed, 78 year old man, praiseworthy?
    You have nicely depicted the difference between the feelings of Godse, and the rest of the humanity. Gandhi's death is one of the biggest loss the world has suffered.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Godse is one character I would have relegated into oblivion. Unfortunately my country brings him up again and again even to the horror of instituting him as a deity!

      Delete
  4. A man like Gandhi could not have died of common cold. Fanatics outlive Gandhi.

    ReplyDelete
  5. People say to me that Godse did the right thing. I don't understand how. India is for Hindus! If everyone is going to put up weapon and kill others for dangerous notions as this the world shall doom, World has always suffered due to such mentality of some people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is plain lack of understanding of history and some silly selfish motives that drive the Right Wing in India today. We call Obama as Guest but we officially declare hatred of non-Hindus!

      Delete
  6. Sarcastically, Gandhiji hailed from Gujarat too...

    ReplyDelete
  7. By the way, you've narrated the event very well... :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's all history, Maniparna. I've relied heavily on 'Freedom at Midnight' for the description.

      Delete
  8. I've come across quite a number of people who admire Godse...and even Hitler. No wonder then that history never encounters a dearth of dimwits. Every era has its special nutcase.

    I have an 'unconventional' (read less accepted) view of our extremist freedom fighters too. All of them were young, immature, half-educated guys who set out to seek vengeance for British oppression, but more often than not ended up killing the wrong guys. Srange that history sometimes makes heroes out of nincompoops

    Loved this post :)

    Do drop by mine

    Cheers
    CRD

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bhagat Singh is an example of the young and hot-blooded type that you mention. He regretted later that he used violence and denounced the use of violence for attaining noble objectives. But many youngsters of today are not aware of the latter part of Bhagat Singh's views.

      Delete
  9. "brotherhood of men" is one term even terrorists need to understand the meaning of.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Godse said he would kill Gandhi even in his next birth. That is terrorism.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Florentino’s Many Loves

Florentino Ariza has had 622 serious relationships (combo pack with sex) apart from numerous fleeting liaisons before he is able to embrace the only woman whom he loved with all his heart and soul. And that embrace happens “after a long and troubled love affair” that lasted 51 years, 9 months, and 4 days. Florentino is in his late 70s when he is able to behold, and hold as well, the very body of his beloved Fermina, who is just a few years younger than him. She now stands before him with her wrinkled shoulders, sagged breasts, and flabby skin that is as pale and cold as a frog’s. It is the culmination of a long, very long, wait as far as Florentino is concerned, the end of his passionate quest for his holy grail. “I’ve remained a virgin for you,” he says. All those 622 and more women whose details filled the 25 diaries that he kept writing with meticulous devotion have now vanished into thin air. They mean nothing now that he has reached where he longed to reach all his life. The

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Unromantic Men

Romance is a tenderness of the heart. That is disappearing even from the movies. Tenderness of heart is not a virtue anymore; it is a weakness. Who is an ideal man in today’s world? Shakespeare’s Romeo and Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay’s Devdas would be considered as fools in today’s world in which the wealthiest individuals appear on elite lists, ‘strong’ leaders are hailed as nationalist heroes, and success is equated with anything other than traditional virtues. The protagonist of Colleen McCullough’s 1977 novel, The Thorn Birds [which sold more than 33 million copies], is torn between his idealism and his natural weaknesses as a human being. Ralph de Bricassart is a young Catholic priest who is sent on a kind of punishment-appointment to a remote rural area of Australia where the Cleary family arrives from New Zealand in 1921 to take care of the enormous estate of Mary Carson who is Paddy Cleary’s own sister. Meggy Cleary is the only daughter of Paddy and Fiona who have eight so

Octlantis

I was reading an essay on octopuses when friend John walked in. When he is bored of his usual activities – babysitting and gardening – he would come over. Politics was the favourite concern of our conversations. We discussed politics so earnestly that any observer might think that we were running the world through the politicians quite like the gods running it through their devotees. “Octopuses are quite queer creatures,” I said. The essay I was reading had got all my attention. Moreover, I was getting bored of politics which is irredeemable anyway. “They have too many brains and a lot of hearts.” “That’s queer indeed,” John agreed. “Each arm has a mind of its own. Two-thirds of an octopus’s neurons are found in their arms. The arms can taste, touch, feel and act on their own without any input from the brain.” “They are quite like our politicians,” John observed. Everything is linked to politics in John’s mind. I was impressed with his analogy, however. “Perhaps, you’re r

Yesterday

With students of Carmel Margaret, are you grieving / Over Goldengrove unleaving…? It was one of my first days in the eleventh class of Carmel Public School in Kerala, the last school of my teaching career. One girl, whose name was not Margaret, was in the class looking extremely melancholy. I had noticed her for a few days. I didn’t know how to put the matter over to her. I had already told the students that a smiling face was a rule in the English class. Since Margaret didn’t comply, I chose to drag Hopkins in. I replaced the name of Margaret with the girl’s actual name, however, when I quoted the lines. Margaret is a little girl in the Hopkins poem. Looking at autumn’s falling leaves, Margaret is saddened by the fact of life’s inevitable degeneration. The leaves have to turn yellow and eventually fall. And decay. The poet tells her that she has no choice but accept certain inevitabilities of life. Sorrow is our legacy, Margaret , I said to Margaret’s alter ego in my class. Let