Skip to main content

Optimism

A part of the staff quarters demolished partly by RSSB initially and left as such for months just to demoralise the staff


I had a colleague in Delhi who fought two successive cases in the court of justice in order to get his job back. Let me call him Sachin. He won the first case and arrived at a compromise in the second. He went through veritable hells during his fights but never lost his optimism. Yesterday when I posited a question on Facebook whether the Karnataka by-election results were an indication of people’s disillusionment with the BJP, Sachin was one of the first to assert confidently, “Surely not.”

Sachin was a math teacher in the senior secondary section which already had another math teacher. He was brought in because students were unhappy with the existing teacher. It is quite difficult to be a popular math teacher and Sachin too faced an uphill task which eventually became too daunting especially with the uncooperative attitude of the management and a section of the staff. A series of incidents led Sachin into depression and he submitted his resignation letter to the head of academics in frustration.  The very next morning, however, he came to his senses, aided by his family members and some of his perceptive colleagues [among whom I include myself] and applied for the withdrawal of his resignation. There was no technical or legal objection to that withdrawal. However, the head of academics issued him a letter stating that the school had already accepted his resignation and he had to move out immediately. His first court case followed immediately. The court judged in his favour after some four years or so and he had to be taken back by the school.

Soon after that the management of the school changed hands. A religious cult called Radha Soami Stasang Beas [RSSB] took over the school with mala fide intentions. They promised to run the school in a better way than the previous management though none of the staff trusted them. The actions of RSSB justified our suspicions. Soon after taking over the school the new management started dismissing the staff one by one on various pretexts most of which were whimsical or flippant. Sachin was one of the many who lost their job to the religious fervour of RSSB. He filed his second case in the court.

Being aware of the influence that RSSB wielded in the government, among politicians and others with any power as well as the local rank and file, I suggested an out-of-court settlement. Sachin’s sensibility was offended. “Sir,” he told me with an exceptional confidence, “I trust in the judiciary of this country. Satyameva jayate.”

His optimism was misplaced, however. RSSB managed to get the entire staff and students out of the campus in a couple of years’ time. Then they razed every building – the school, a huge library, auditorium, hostels, staff quarters, hospital, dining hall, etc – and the entire 15-acre campus was converted into a parking lot for the cult’s devotees.  The cult had used various strategies, most of which were unfair and many were extremely diabolic, to achieve their final objective of annihilating the school.

I still remember one morning Sachin emerging from his staff quarters wearing nothing more than a pair of shorts and vest when the bulldozer started demolishing a wing of the staff quarters from which he had refused to vacate in spite of repeated orders from the management. I admired his guts. He called the police instantly and complained that the management was trying to kill him and his family. He had actually got a stay order from the court against the management’s order for vacating his residence. He won this time. The bulldozer had to withdraw. The withdrawal was for a few hours, however. RSSB is too powerful for a man like Sachin, however brave and honest he may be.

Sachin had to leave the campus soon. We all followed him in a matter of a few days. Such was the power of the religious cult. Whatever happened during that period added profundity to my inherent cynicism. But Sachin continued to be an ardent optimist.

Ambrose Bierce saw optimism as “an intellectual disorder” which is “hereditary but not contagious.”  I don’t know if it really is hereditary. But I’m convinced that it is a disorder when it crosses the borders of common sense. Bierce defined optimism as “a doctrine or belief that everything is beautiful including what is ugly”.  Everything is right including the wrong, for the optimist. The optimist will admonish you if you say the glass is half-empty because for him it is half-full. The optimist holds on to his faith with “greatest tenacity.” Bierce goes on to say that “Being a blind faith, it is inaccessible to the light of disproof.”

Sachin frequently accuses me of being a “negative” and “hateful” man merely because I question the evils like lynching, communalism, fraudulence and chicanery perpetrated by the ruling BJP. His faith in the party is blind in the sense pointed out by Bierce.

I consider myself a realist. I accept the good as good and the bad as bad. I have a very strongly founded ethical system of my own which I follow meticulously though the religious optimists may not understand it. I can understand the aspirations of the man who gazes longingly at the stars in the heavens while standing rooted in the filthiest gutter. I too long to reach the stars. But I know the reality in which I am grounded. I know that real optimism begins from that reality. Mere longing is a hollow dream.



Comments

  1. I hereby would like all the readers to know that this year in march, the land underneath school and much more acquired land by the same cult has been taken back by supreme court.
    But, sad part is the sleeping government is still sleeping

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for this information. I was not aware of it.

      RSSB will get its retribution for ruining many people's careers also, i hope.

      Delete
    2. You write hard hitting posts. Though I do not agree with many of your posts, I agree Radha Swami group is powerful. In India, judicial process is slow. A battery of highly paid lawyers can certainly manipulate the system. If the Radha Swami group was being unfair to school staff, why did everyone not file a joint application to the court against demolition? It would have been financially more easy and case would be stronger.

      Delete
    3. We tried to unite the staff but failed. People are essentially selfish and most staff thought they would either be safe or benefit personally by being friendly with the cult. Some were afraid. Some became ardent devotees (and quit as soon as the school was decimated). RSSB attacked the staff members using different strategies. Some were assaulted on public roads. There was a non-bailable charge of molesting women foisted on one. It became an unbearable nightmare for all of us. We approached powerful politicians but they bluntly admitted their helplessness. The lawyers who argued some of our cases were bribed by the cult and thus we were betrayed by them too. I detested Delhi with all that and quit the place for good.

      Delete
  2. More than being an optimist or a pessimist, I would prefer to be a realist. But then what is realistic varies from individual to individual.
    He might have lost the battle, but he probably gained a moral victory. It all depends on a person's individual's choice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course, that's right. That's why we continue to be friends in spite of our differences.

      Delete
  3. "An intellectual disorder", that's what has happened to all the bhakts who can not see or stand the light of disbelief.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Belief is okay. But blind faith which crosses the limits of common sense is terrifying.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...