Skip to main content

Religion and Meaning

Maggie [my wife] and a friend at Badrinath


In the post-graduate course in psychology I did a decade ago, there were dozens of theories and corresponding practical approaches for dealing with psychological problems. Religion was not mentioned anywhere in those theories or their practical approaches. Yet religion remains the most common refuge of people from their day-to-day trials and tribulations. Millions of people rely on religion for making sense of their life. Moreover, religion has been coeval with homo sapiens. We cannot obviously ignore religion when we discuss people’s search for life’s meaning.
My mother was an example of a typical religious believer. Hers was a simple faith which accepted the given dogmas and rituals without a question. The Bible was the ultimate source of truth for her though she never cared to study it systematically. In fact, she knew nothing more of the Bible than what the priests preached from various pulpits. If anyone pointed out the contradictions within the sacred scriptures, she would dismiss them as immaterial matters. Knowledge, intellect and reason had nothing to do with religious faith, as far as she was concerned.
She offered endless prayers to God. She attended the church regularly and devoutly. She prayed for miracles when the going got tough and beyond her control. If something good turned out, she believed that God had answered her prayers. If nothing good came, she consoled herself that it was God’s wish. Her suffering was not a fraction of what Jesus went through in his last days, she would say. 
Her faith kept her relatively happier and healthier. She was no saint, however. She possessed the normal human foibles and vices. That made her scared of hell. She was sure that she had to pass through some period of purgation before being eligible to meet her God after death. She believed that prayer had the power to reduce her soul’s suffering in purgatory and get her a seat in heaven more quickly. So she prayed a lot more in her last days. She hoped that her children would pray for her redemption after her death.
If her God really existed, I’m sure He would be quite pleased by her simplistic faith and religious practices. The biblical God is not so magnanimous, however. But my mother’s faith lay in the average believer’s grey realms rather than the biblical God’s clearly demarcated black-and-white morality. My mother would have found the thirteenth-century mystic Rumi’s god more in harmony with her genes and inclinations.
In one of Rumi’s poems, Moses overhears a shepherd speaking to God. The shepherd tells God that he wants to wash God’s clothes, pick the lice off, and kiss His hands and feet at bedtime. He admits that he does not know how to pray. “All I can say, remembering You, is ayyyy and ahhhhhh,” he tells God.
Moses is horrified. He thinks that the shepherd is talking to God as if He were his old uncle. He rebukes the shepherd who repents his sin and wanders disconsolately off into the desert.
God rebukes Moses. “What seems wrong to you is right for him,” God tells Moses. “Ways of worshipping are not to be ranked as better or worse than one another.” Rumi’s God goes on, “Hindus do Hindu things / The Dravidian Muslims in India do what they do. / It’s all praise, and it’s all right.” God tells Moses that the heart of the believer is what matters, not the words he uses in his prayer.
Religion offers the meaning of life to the believer when he internalises his religion in his own way. My mother did that. Rumi’s shepherd did that. Most ordinary believers do that.
These ordinary believers belong to somewhere in the middle of the religious continuum at either end of which stands the fundamentalist/terrorist and the saint. The fundamentalist and the saint too give shape to their lives with the help of religion. Both take religion to the extremes: opposite extremes. One extreme generates hatred while the other generates compassion.
Both the fundamentalist and the saint have certain serious psychological problems. Both are unhappy with themselves as well as the world. They find it difficult to accept the flaws, whether in themselves or outside.
The fundamentalist projects his indignation and unhappiness to god. He remoulds god in his image and thus reduces god to less than himself. God becomes subservient to the fundamentalist’s redemptive vision for the world. God becomes the certificate of merit for the heinous deeds perpetrated by the fundamentalist.
The saint, on the other hand, places himself at the feet of god in absolute humility. He accepts responsibility for his imperfections and also the imperfections of the reality around him. The saint’s vision is rooted in a compassionate acknowledgement of the imperfections as much as the fundamentalist’s is in hateful rejection. The fundamentalist brings the bomb to dispel the darkness while the saint brings light. The fundamentalist brings the sword to snip hatred while the saint brings love.
The fundamentalist transmutes religion into a horror. The saint is usually perceived and tolerated as an innocuous oddity until his death and venerated thereafter. The average person continues to make more practical use of religion.
 
A church near Kottayam
I am taking my blog to the next level with Blogchatter’s #MyFriendAlexa

This post is the 2nd in a series on Meaning of Life.
The 3rd will be: Career and Meaning

Comments

  1. The contradiction brought between the fundamentalist and the saint is the stark reality of today. And this lines "God becomes the certificate of merit for the heinous deeds perpetrated by the fundamentalist" holds true for most of our generation. I hope more people read your blog and find true happiness in god's feet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The fundamentalists strip religion of its meaning and virtues. Every religion would do better without the ardour of fundamentalism.

      Delete
  2. I enjoyed every bit of the article :) it resonates with the realities of the time we live in. somehow, i think that we have got carried away in the freedom that religion provides and have misconstrued it for own purpose/ gain. i liked the piece which mentions that it's the heart of the believer that matters and not the words. another related concern is the overlapping of the spiritual and the religion worlds. to me, they are mutually disjoint though one may well be the ladder for the other, but we need to stop perceiving them as the same. look forward to your next post

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. Spirituality and religion are not the same but not disjoint either, I believe. Spirituality stands notches above religion, i agree.

      Delete
  3. I agree with the attitude of people like your mother when it comes to matters related to faith. Yes, Knowledge, intellect and reasoning has nothing to do with faith and spirituality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can accept the view. But my intellect rebels against things that go against reason. I'm not religious, by the way.

      Delete
  4. Wow such a nice post it is so beautifully expressed in words
    Good work, hope to read more from you soon

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hope to write the next post tomorrow. Have been busy at school these days.

      Delete
    2. When an life emerges it's the embryo that grows and firstly it is the heart that takes shape..And there begins a new life if identity.. the heart leads life..Transmits life transforms life to a journey that never returns

      Delete
    3. The heart, metaphorically human emotions, is quite savage. Religion can help one tame it.

      Delete
  5. This is deep. A fundamentalist never understands any religion. And most human's actions are influenced by their believe fueled by fear of Gods.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People's inner emotions get projected as their god. Why should anyone create a monstrous god?

      Delete
  6. I am happy to read another post on the similar lines of what I had written a couple of days ago. I am sure, you will also like to read my view on this point. https://adisjournal.com/on-religion

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd already read your post before you came here. Yes, there are many similarities in our views.

      Delete
    2. Very detailed post. I can feel that you've really thought about all those little aspects really well. Good read.

      Delete
  7. I enjoyed reading your thoughts on a controversial subject like religion. Personally, I feel that the most useless thing created by man is religion and the world would be a better place without it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I endorse your view. I'm no believer. This post took a look at what role religion plays in helping people to make sense of their lives.

      Delete
    2. Religion and your beliefs makes a big difference, their are many people around us who have blind trust in religion and whatever you say doesn't affect them. I am not so religious but yes I believe in positivity.

      Delete
    3. The post is a humble attempt to make people understand what religion really is or can be. Ultimately it's each believer's choice what to do with his/her religion.

      Delete
  8. I don't speak my views on religion in open as I feel it is a very personal thing for every individual and every person has its own view of perceiving it. But still I couldn't stop myself from reading this whole article and agreeing to so many things you said here. One thing which struck me was that the heart of the believer is what matters, not the words he uses in his prayer. I believe in this strongly.
    #readbypreetispanorama

    ReplyDelete
  9. every person's faith is different on God and I firmly believe as your mother says that through prayers we can lessen our sufferings in this world.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pranita a perverted genius

Bulldozer begins its work at Sawan Pranita was a perverted genius. She had Machiavelli’s brain, Octavian’s relentlessness, and Levin’s intellectual calibre. She could have worked wonders if she wanted. She could have created a beautiful world around her. She had the potential. Yet she chose to be a ruthless exterminator. She came to Sawan Public School just to kill it. A religious cult called Radha Soami Satsang Beas [RSSB] had taken over the school from its owner who had never visited the school for over 20 years. This owner, a prominent entrepreneur with a gargantuan ego, had come to the conclusion that the morality of the school’s staff was deviating from the wavelengths determined by him. Moreover, his one foot was inching towards the grave. I was also told that there were some domestic noises which were grating against his patriarchal sensibilities. One holy solution for all these was to hand over the school and its enormous campus (nearly 20 acres of land on the outskirts

Machiavelli the Reverend

Let us go today , you and I, through certain miasmic streets. Nothing will be quite clear along our way because this journey is through some delusions and illusions. You will meet people wearing holy robes and talking about morality and virtues. Some of them will claim to be god’s men and some will make taller claims. Some of them are just amorphous. Invisible. But omnipotent. You can feel their power around you. On you. Oppressing you. Stifling you. Reverend Machiavelli is one such oppressive power. You will meet Franz Kafka somewhere along the way. Joseph K’s ghost will pass by. Remember Joseph K who was arrested one fine morning for a crime that nobody knew anything about? Neither Joseph nor the men who arrest him know why Joseph K is arrested. The power that keeps Joseph K under arrest is invisible. He cannot get answers to his valid questions from the visible agents of that power. He cannot explain himself to that power. Finally, he is taken to a quarry outside the town wher

Levin the good shepherd

AI-generated image The lost sheep and its redeemer form a pet motif in Christianity. Jesus portrayed himself as a good shepherd many times. He said that the good shepherd will leave his 99 sheep in order to bring the lost sheep back to the fold. When he finds the lost sheep, the shepherd is happier about that one sheep than about the 99, Jesus claimed. He was speaking metaphorically. The lost sheep is the sinner in Jesus’ parable. Sin is a departure from the ‘right’ way. Angels raise a toast in heaven whenever a sinner returns to the ‘right’ path [Luke 15:10]. A lot of Catholic priests I know carry some sort of a Redeemer complex in their souls. They love the sinner so much that they cannot rest until they make the angels of God run for their cups of joy. I have also been fortunate to have one such priest-friend whom I shall call Levin in this post. He has befriended me right from the year 1976 when I was a blundering adolescent and he was just one year older than me. He possesse

Kailasnath the Paradox

AI-generated illustration It wasn’t easy to discern whether he was a friend or merely an amused onlooker. He was my colleague at the college, though from another department. When my life had entered a slippery slope because of certain unresolved psychological problems, he didn’t choose to shun me as most others did. However, when he did condescend to join me in the college canteen sipping tea and smoking a cigarette, I wasn’t ever sure whether he was befriending me or mocking me. Kailasnath was a bundle of paradoxes. He appeared to be an alpha male, so self-assured and lord of all that he surveyed. Yet if you cared to observe deeply, you would find too many chinks in his armour. Beneath all those domineering words and gestures lay ample signs of frailty. The tall, elegantly slim and precisely erect stature would draw anyone’s attention quickly. Kailasnath was always attractively dressed though never unduly stylish. Everything about him exuded an air of chic confidence. But the wa

Nakulan the Outcast

Nakulan was one of the many tenants of Hevendrea . A professor in the botany department of the North Eastern Hill University, he was a very lovable person. Some sense of inferiority complex that came from his caste status made him scoff the very idea of his lovability. He lived with his wife and three children in one of Heavendrea’s many cottages. When he wanted to have a drink, he would walk over to my hut. We sipped our whiskies and discussed Shillong’s intriguing politics or something of the sort while my cassette player crooned gently in the background. Nakulan was more than ten years my senior by age. He taught a subject which had never aroused my interest at any stage of my life. It made no difference to me whether a leaf was pinnately compound or palmately compound. You don’t need to know about anther and stigma in order to understand a flower. My friend Levin would have ascribed my lack of interest in Nakulan’s subject to my egomania. I always thought that Nakulan lived