Skip to main content

Religion and Meaning

Maggie [my wife] and a friend at Badrinath


In the post-graduate course in psychology I did a decade ago, there were dozens of theories and corresponding practical approaches for dealing with psychological problems. Religion was not mentioned anywhere in those theories or their practical approaches. Yet religion remains the most common refuge of people from their day-to-day trials and tribulations. Millions of people rely on religion for making sense of their life. Moreover, religion has been coeval with homo sapiens. We cannot obviously ignore religion when we discuss people’s search for life’s meaning.
My mother was an example of a typical religious believer. Hers was a simple faith which accepted the given dogmas and rituals without a question. The Bible was the ultimate source of truth for her though she never cared to study it systematically. In fact, she knew nothing more of the Bible than what the priests preached from various pulpits. If anyone pointed out the contradictions within the sacred scriptures, she would dismiss them as immaterial matters. Knowledge, intellect and reason had nothing to do with religious faith, as far as she was concerned.
She offered endless prayers to God. She attended the church regularly and devoutly. She prayed for miracles when the going got tough and beyond her control. If something good turned out, she believed that God had answered her prayers. If nothing good came, she consoled herself that it was God’s wish. Her suffering was not a fraction of what Jesus went through in his last days, she would say. 
Her faith kept her relatively happier and healthier. She was no saint, however. She possessed the normal human foibles and vices. That made her scared of hell. She was sure that she had to pass through some period of purgation before being eligible to meet her God after death. She believed that prayer had the power to reduce her soul’s suffering in purgatory and get her a seat in heaven more quickly. So she prayed a lot more in her last days. She hoped that her children would pray for her redemption after her death.
If her God really existed, I’m sure He would be quite pleased by her simplistic faith and religious practices. The biblical God is not so magnanimous, however. But my mother’s faith lay in the average believer’s grey realms rather than the biblical God’s clearly demarcated black-and-white morality. My mother would have found the thirteenth-century mystic Rumi’s god more in harmony with her genes and inclinations.
In one of Rumi’s poems, Moses overhears a shepherd speaking to God. The shepherd tells God that he wants to wash God’s clothes, pick the lice off, and kiss His hands and feet at bedtime. He admits that he does not know how to pray. “All I can say, remembering You, is ayyyy and ahhhhhh,” he tells God.
Moses is horrified. He thinks that the shepherd is talking to God as if He were his old uncle. He rebukes the shepherd who repents his sin and wanders disconsolately off into the desert.
God rebukes Moses. “What seems wrong to you is right for him,” God tells Moses. “Ways of worshipping are not to be ranked as better or worse than one another.” Rumi’s God goes on, “Hindus do Hindu things / The Dravidian Muslims in India do what they do. / It’s all praise, and it’s all right.” God tells Moses that the heart of the believer is what matters, not the words he uses in his prayer.
Religion offers the meaning of life to the believer when he internalises his religion in his own way. My mother did that. Rumi’s shepherd did that. Most ordinary believers do that.
These ordinary believers belong to somewhere in the middle of the religious continuum at either end of which stands the fundamentalist/terrorist and the saint. The fundamentalist and the saint too give shape to their lives with the help of religion. Both take religion to the extremes: opposite extremes. One extreme generates hatred while the other generates compassion.
Both the fundamentalist and the saint have certain serious psychological problems. Both are unhappy with themselves as well as the world. They find it difficult to accept the flaws, whether in themselves or outside.
The fundamentalist projects his indignation and unhappiness to god. He remoulds god in his image and thus reduces god to less than himself. God becomes subservient to the fundamentalist’s redemptive vision for the world. God becomes the certificate of merit for the heinous deeds perpetrated by the fundamentalist.
The saint, on the other hand, places himself at the feet of god in absolute humility. He accepts responsibility for his imperfections and also the imperfections of the reality around him. The saint’s vision is rooted in a compassionate acknowledgement of the imperfections as much as the fundamentalist’s is in hateful rejection. The fundamentalist brings the bomb to dispel the darkness while the saint brings light. The fundamentalist brings the sword to snip hatred while the saint brings love.
The fundamentalist transmutes religion into a horror. The saint is usually perceived and tolerated as an innocuous oddity until his death and venerated thereafter. The average person continues to make more practical use of religion.
 
A church near Kottayam
I am taking my blog to the next level with Blogchatter’s #MyFriendAlexa

This post is the 2nd in a series on Meaning of Life.
The 3rd will be: Career and Meaning

Comments

  1. The contradiction brought between the fundamentalist and the saint is the stark reality of today. And this lines "God becomes the certificate of merit for the heinous deeds perpetrated by the fundamentalist" holds true for most of our generation. I hope more people read your blog and find true happiness in god's feet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The fundamentalists strip religion of its meaning and virtues. Every religion would do better without the ardour of fundamentalism.

      Delete
  2. I enjoyed every bit of the article :) it resonates with the realities of the time we live in. somehow, i think that we have got carried away in the freedom that religion provides and have misconstrued it for own purpose/ gain. i liked the piece which mentions that it's the heart of the believer that matters and not the words. another related concern is the overlapping of the spiritual and the religion worlds. to me, they are mutually disjoint though one may well be the ladder for the other, but we need to stop perceiving them as the same. look forward to your next post

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. Spirituality and religion are not the same but not disjoint either, I believe. Spirituality stands notches above religion, i agree.

      Delete
  3. I agree with the attitude of people like your mother when it comes to matters related to faith. Yes, Knowledge, intellect and reasoning has nothing to do with faith and spirituality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can accept the view. But my intellect rebels against things that go against reason. I'm not religious, by the way.

      Delete
  4. Wow such a nice post it is so beautifully expressed in words
    Good work, hope to read more from you soon

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hope to write the next post tomorrow. Have been busy at school these days.

      Delete
    2. When an life emerges it's the embryo that grows and firstly it is the heart that takes shape..And there begins a new life if identity.. the heart leads life..Transmits life transforms life to a journey that never returns

      Delete
    3. The heart, metaphorically human emotions, is quite savage. Religion can help one tame it.

      Delete
  5. This is deep. A fundamentalist never understands any religion. And most human's actions are influenced by their believe fueled by fear of Gods.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People's inner emotions get projected as their god. Why should anyone create a monstrous god?

      Delete
  6. I am happy to read another post on the similar lines of what I had written a couple of days ago. I am sure, you will also like to read my view on this point. https://adisjournal.com/on-religion

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd already read your post before you came here. Yes, there are many similarities in our views.

      Delete
    2. Very detailed post. I can feel that you've really thought about all those little aspects really well. Good read.

      Delete
  7. I enjoyed reading your thoughts on a controversial subject like religion. Personally, I feel that the most useless thing created by man is religion and the world would be a better place without it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I endorse your view. I'm no believer. This post took a look at what role religion plays in helping people to make sense of their lives.

      Delete
    2. Religion and your beliefs makes a big difference, their are many people around us who have blind trust in religion and whatever you say doesn't affect them. I am not so religious but yes I believe in positivity.

      Delete
    3. The post is a humble attempt to make people understand what religion really is or can be. Ultimately it's each believer's choice what to do with his/her religion.

      Delete
  8. I don't speak my views on religion in open as I feel it is a very personal thing for every individual and every person has its own view of perceiving it. But still I couldn't stop myself from reading this whole article and agreeing to so many things you said here. One thing which struck me was that the heart of the believer is what matters, not the words he uses in his prayer. I believe in this strongly.
    #readbypreetispanorama

    ReplyDelete
  9. every person's faith is different on God and I firmly believe as your mother says that through prayers we can lessen our sufferings in this world.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...