Skip to main content

Religion and Meaning

Maggie [my wife] and a friend at Badrinath


In the post-graduate course in psychology I did a decade ago, there were dozens of theories and corresponding practical approaches for dealing with psychological problems. Religion was not mentioned anywhere in those theories or their practical approaches. Yet religion remains the most common refuge of people from their day-to-day trials and tribulations. Millions of people rely on religion for making sense of their life. Moreover, religion has been coeval with homo sapiens. We cannot obviously ignore religion when we discuss people’s search for life’s meaning.
My mother was an example of a typical religious believer. Hers was a simple faith which accepted the given dogmas and rituals without a question. The Bible was the ultimate source of truth for her though she never cared to study it systematically. In fact, she knew nothing more of the Bible than what the priests preached from various pulpits. If anyone pointed out the contradictions within the sacred scriptures, she would dismiss them as immaterial matters. Knowledge, intellect and reason had nothing to do with religious faith, as far as she was concerned.
She offered endless prayers to God. She attended the church regularly and devoutly. She prayed for miracles when the going got tough and beyond her control. If something good turned out, she believed that God had answered her prayers. If nothing good came, she consoled herself that it was God’s wish. Her suffering was not a fraction of what Jesus went through in his last days, she would say. 
Her faith kept her relatively happier and healthier. She was no saint, however. She possessed the normal human foibles and vices. That made her scared of hell. She was sure that she had to pass through some period of purgation before being eligible to meet her God after death. She believed that prayer had the power to reduce her soul’s suffering in purgatory and get her a seat in heaven more quickly. So she prayed a lot more in her last days. She hoped that her children would pray for her redemption after her death.
If her God really existed, I’m sure He would be quite pleased by her simplistic faith and religious practices. The biblical God is not so magnanimous, however. But my mother’s faith lay in the average believer’s grey realms rather than the biblical God’s clearly demarcated black-and-white morality. My mother would have found the thirteenth-century mystic Rumi’s god more in harmony with her genes and inclinations.
In one of Rumi’s poems, Moses overhears a shepherd speaking to God. The shepherd tells God that he wants to wash God’s clothes, pick the lice off, and kiss His hands and feet at bedtime. He admits that he does not know how to pray. “All I can say, remembering You, is ayyyy and ahhhhhh,” he tells God.
Moses is horrified. He thinks that the shepherd is talking to God as if He were his old uncle. He rebukes the shepherd who repents his sin and wanders disconsolately off into the desert.
God rebukes Moses. “What seems wrong to you is right for him,” God tells Moses. “Ways of worshipping are not to be ranked as better or worse than one another.” Rumi’s God goes on, “Hindus do Hindu things / The Dravidian Muslims in India do what they do. / It’s all praise, and it’s all right.” God tells Moses that the heart of the believer is what matters, not the words he uses in his prayer.
Religion offers the meaning of life to the believer when he internalises his religion in his own way. My mother did that. Rumi’s shepherd did that. Most ordinary believers do that.
These ordinary believers belong to somewhere in the middle of the religious continuum at either end of which stands the fundamentalist/terrorist and the saint. The fundamentalist and the saint too give shape to their lives with the help of religion. Both take religion to the extremes: opposite extremes. One extreme generates hatred while the other generates compassion.
Both the fundamentalist and the saint have certain serious psychological problems. Both are unhappy with themselves as well as the world. They find it difficult to accept the flaws, whether in themselves or outside.
The fundamentalist projects his indignation and unhappiness to god. He remoulds god in his image and thus reduces god to less than himself. God becomes subservient to the fundamentalist’s redemptive vision for the world. God becomes the certificate of merit for the heinous deeds perpetrated by the fundamentalist.
The saint, on the other hand, places himself at the feet of god in absolute humility. He accepts responsibility for his imperfections and also the imperfections of the reality around him. The saint’s vision is rooted in a compassionate acknowledgement of the imperfections as much as the fundamentalist’s is in hateful rejection. The fundamentalist brings the bomb to dispel the darkness while the saint brings light. The fundamentalist brings the sword to snip hatred while the saint brings love.
The fundamentalist transmutes religion into a horror. The saint is usually perceived and tolerated as an innocuous oddity until his death and venerated thereafter. The average person continues to make more practical use of religion.
 
A church near Kottayam
I am taking my blog to the next level with Blogchatter’s #MyFriendAlexa

This post is the 2nd in a series on Meaning of Life.
The 3rd will be: Career and Meaning

Comments

  1. The contradiction brought between the fundamentalist and the saint is the stark reality of today. And this lines "God becomes the certificate of merit for the heinous deeds perpetrated by the fundamentalist" holds true for most of our generation. I hope more people read your blog and find true happiness in god's feet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The fundamentalists strip religion of its meaning and virtues. Every religion would do better without the ardour of fundamentalism.

      Delete
  2. I enjoyed every bit of the article :) it resonates with the realities of the time we live in. somehow, i think that we have got carried away in the freedom that religion provides and have misconstrued it for own purpose/ gain. i liked the piece which mentions that it's the heart of the believer that matters and not the words. another related concern is the overlapping of the spiritual and the religion worlds. to me, they are mutually disjoint though one may well be the ladder for the other, but we need to stop perceiving them as the same. look forward to your next post

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. Spirituality and religion are not the same but not disjoint either, I believe. Spirituality stands notches above religion, i agree.

      Delete
  3. I agree with the attitude of people like your mother when it comes to matters related to faith. Yes, Knowledge, intellect and reasoning has nothing to do with faith and spirituality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can accept the view. But my intellect rebels against things that go against reason. I'm not religious, by the way.

      Delete
  4. Wow such a nice post it is so beautifully expressed in words
    Good work, hope to read more from you soon

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hope to write the next post tomorrow. Have been busy at school these days.

      Delete
    2. When an life emerges it's the embryo that grows and firstly it is the heart that takes shape..And there begins a new life if identity.. the heart leads life..Transmits life transforms life to a journey that never returns

      Delete
    3. The heart, metaphorically human emotions, is quite savage. Religion can help one tame it.

      Delete
  5. This is deep. A fundamentalist never understands any religion. And most human's actions are influenced by their believe fueled by fear of Gods.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People's inner emotions get projected as their god. Why should anyone create a monstrous god?

      Delete
  6. I am happy to read another post on the similar lines of what I had written a couple of days ago. I am sure, you will also like to read my view on this point. https://adisjournal.com/on-religion

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd already read your post before you came here. Yes, there are many similarities in our views.

      Delete
    2. Very detailed post. I can feel that you've really thought about all those little aspects really well. Good read.

      Delete
  7. I enjoyed reading your thoughts on a controversial subject like religion. Personally, I feel that the most useless thing created by man is religion and the world would be a better place without it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I endorse your view. I'm no believer. This post took a look at what role religion plays in helping people to make sense of their lives.

      Delete
    2. Religion and your beliefs makes a big difference, their are many people around us who have blind trust in religion and whatever you say doesn't affect them. I am not so religious but yes I believe in positivity.

      Delete
    3. The post is a humble attempt to make people understand what religion really is or can be. Ultimately it's each believer's choice what to do with his/her religion.

      Delete
  8. I don't speak my views on religion in open as I feel it is a very personal thing for every individual and every person has its own view of perceiving it. But still I couldn't stop myself from reading this whole article and agreeing to so many things you said here. One thing which struck me was that the heart of the believer is what matters, not the words he uses in his prayer. I believe in this strongly.
    #readbypreetispanorama

    ReplyDelete
  9. every person's faith is different on God and I firmly believe as your mother says that through prayers we can lessen our sufferings in this world.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Excellent blog post.Explore zoroastrian centre pune. Asha Vahishta, meaning "Best Truth" or "Excellent Order," is a central concept in Zoroastrianism, representing the divine principle of truth, righteousness, and cosmic order.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Break Your Barriers

  Guest Post Break Your Barriers : 10 Strategic Career Essentials to Grow in Value by Anu Sunil  A Review by Jose D. Maliekal SDB Anu Sunil’s Break Your Barriers is a refreshing guide for anyone seeking growth in life and work. It blends career strategy, personal philosophy, and practical management insights into a resource that speaks to educators, HR professionals, and leaders across both faith-based and secular settings. Having spent nearly four decades teaching philosophy and shaping human resources in Catholic seminaries, I found the book deeply enriching. Its central message is clear: most limitations are self-imposed, and imagination is the key to breaking through them. As the author reminds us, “The only limit to your success is your imagination.” The book’s strength lies in its transdisciplinary approach. It treats careers not just as jobs but as vocations, rooted in the dignity of labour and human development. Themes such as empathy, self-mastery, ethical le...

The Irony of Hindutva in Nagaland

“But we hear you take heads up there.” “Oh, yes, we do,” he replied, and seizing a boy by the head, gave us in a quite harmless way an object-lesson how they did it.” The above conversation took place between Mary Mead Clark, an American missionary in British India, and a Naga tribesman, and is quoted in Clark’s book, A Corner in India (1907). Nagaland is a tiny state in the Northeast of India: just twice the size of the Lakhimpur Kheri district in Uttar Pradesh. In that little corner of India live people belonging to 16 (if not more) distinct tribes who speak more than 30 dialects. These tribes “defy a common nomenclature,” writes Hokishe Sema, former chief minister of the state, in his book, Emergence of Nagaland . Each tribe is quite unique as far as culture and social setups are concerned. Even in physique and appearance, they vary significantly. The Nagas don’t like the common label given to them by outsiders, according to Sema. Nagaland is only 0.5% of India in area. T...

Rushing for Blessings

Pilgrims at Sabarimala Millions of devotees are praying in India’s temples every day. The rush increases year after year and becomes stampedes occasionally. Something similar is happening in the religious places of other faiths too: Christianity and Islam, particularly. It appears that Indians are becoming more and more religious or spiritual. Are they really? If all this religious faith is genuine, why do crimes keep increasing at an incredible rate? Why do people hate each other more and more? Isn’t something wrong seriously? This is the pilgrimage season in Kerala’s Sabarimala temple. Pilgrims are forced to leave the temple without getting a darshan (spiritual view) of the deity due to the rush. Kerala High Court has capped the permitted number of pilgrims there at 75,000 a day. Looking at the serpentine queues of devotees in scanty clothing under the hot sun of Kerala, one would think that India is becoming a land of ascetics and renouncers. If religion were a vaccine agains...

Ghost with a Cat

It was about midnight when Kuriako stopped his car near the roadside eatery known as thattukada in Kerala. He still had another 27 kilometres to go, according to Google Map. Since Google Map had taken him to nowhere lands many a time, Kuriako didn’t commit himself much to that technology. He would rather rely on wayside shopkeepers. Moreover, he needed a cup of lemon tea. ‘How far is Anakkad from here?’ Kuriako asked the tea-vendor. Anakkad is where his friend Varghese lived. The two friends would be meeting after many years now. Both had taken voluntary retirement five years ago from their tedious and rather absurd clerical jobs in a government industry and hadn’t met each other ever since. Varghese abandoned all connection with human civilisation, which he viewed as savagery of the most brutal sort, and went to live in a forest with only the hill tribe people in the neighbourhood. The tribal folk didn’t bother him at all; they had their own occupations. Varghese bought a plot ...