Skip to main content

Truth: who wants it?



Truth is the handmaid of power. As American philosopher Barrows Dunham put it in his book Man Against Myth, “Generally speaking, truth has been suffered to exist in the world just to the extent that it profited the rulers of society.”

If the truths in our scriptures came from the gods, then our gods were also in collusion with those people who wielded the power. Who decided, for instance, that Sanskrit was the language of the gods and the men of the gods, and that the lower caste people should not even hear it spoken? Which gods would have benefited by having molten lead poured into the ears of the lower caste people if they happened to hear the Sanskrit shlokas even inadvertently? Who created the hierarchy of the caste system in the first place?

Why did the Bible make the Serpent tempt Eve rather than Adam? The man who created the myth was creating the ‘truth’ that the woman is a dangerous creature and should always be kept subservient to the male of the species.

Have you ever wondered why most of our gods are male? And why are our goddesses bizarre creatures with either enormous breasts or more enormous teeth? Why did Sita of Ramayana have to prove her chastity not once but three times? [The number depends on which version of the myth you are reading]

The answer to all these questions is one: the truth which necessitated each of those was a fabrication of a vested interest.

Vested interests continue to fabricate truths even today. Who decided, for example, that India belongs to people of one particular religion? Who decided that certain foods and dresses are taboo? [Recall the lawyer who was assaulted by the Madhya Pradesh police just because he “looked like” a Muslim.]

“History is the lies of the victors,” says a young character in Julian Barnes’s novel The Sense of an Ending. His history teacher adds that “it is also the self-delusions of the defeated.” Lies and self-delusions. Most of our truths are those in reality.

We have coined a new phrase now to describe the condition of truths in our own times: post-truth. The word implies circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping our opinions than appeals to emotions and personal beliefs. The award for the best post-truth speeches should go to India’s Prime Minister.




Comments

  1. Every word of this article is true. Hence the reliability of the history made available to us is poor that, indeed, is a naked truth which most of the people deny to acknowledge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Couldn't that denial be a conscious one? People want a different history? Do you think just one person, merely because he has the power of eloquence, could change the history of an enormous nation?

      it may be interesting to conjecture what makes people look for alternative histories.

      Delete
  2. There is a proverb in Hindi that says "jisake hath me lathi usaki bhais". That's true for everyday happenings around us as its the might that is always right and weak doesn't has voice. Truth then turns to be the mistress of the powerful, the victor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It has always been the same situation all through history. So we need not be surprised. The lathi will change hands, however.

      Delete
    2. Very poignant...the progress (?) of civilization bears a unique theory, called Bandit theory, about how rulers came into being..the ways the bandits turned into protectors and subsequently rulers also indicate how tehy started colluding with the
      religious preachers and so called wise people...women has always been the worst casulaty in our social mindset, which received adequate inducement of those interpreters...gods, if at all to be believed, never had any quality..truthfulness...integrity...what's been professed so strongly ...they had to create myth to hide all evil tricks they all along used to subdue others...the history has been power-sanctioned...so has been the larger chunk of art and literature...and the truth have carefully stayed away from all....it remains a subject of self-realization....the battle is unequal, yet, the world has always produced a few luves, who continued to explore it...fight for it, how powerless they.might be, ...and, the future will also be not unkind, I hope...my sincere thanks for enlighting on a very serious matter

      Delete
    3. I'm thrilled to have you as a reader, dear friend Saibal. You add more value to the posts with your observations and views. This Bandit theory goes to show why we have the kind of leaders we do. Why do only such people enter politics? Power and mediocrity of intellect go together, I believe. And the gods join them too.

      Delete
  3. This reminds me of George Orwell's 1984 novel, where the truth constantly changes as per the wishes of the government. It is restricted to a time frame. It is scary to think of such a scenario in real life, where we lose the ability to question our own thoughts or conscience.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aren't we already living in that situation? Look at what's happening in our country. Whatever is presented to us as truth by the government and its media is far from truth. And even those keep shifting. We are asked to shift from one slogan to another, from one dream to another, from one illusion to another. Worst of all is the kind of suffering that people have to endure. People walk thousands of kilometres to reach their homes when the Prime Minister is supposed to CARE with a fund dedicated to just that purpose and the fund has billions of rupees in it. People don't even have the opportunity to become martyrs because heroes just disappear. Heroes are silenced or made to vanish! It is worse than Orwellian world.

      Delete
  4. I landed hee through my husband(Saibal)'s page....Enjoyed reading a few of your writing...Covering issues that matter, what people joyfully avoid...Truth is a non-entity in the pretty world...Even the half-truths...It stands only on the bulk of utter lies....Completely deceitful globe of life...Even far away from the power...The perpetuity of lesser truths in approximation to the ultimate has fled even from the holy books...None wants it....We only allow it to exist in our serpent's lips...My sincere regards

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Happy you landed here. Saibal has been a frequent visitor.

      Truth is the biggest casualty in the post-truth world of today. Don't know when our world will crash under the weight of all its falsehood. It has to, one day.

      Delete
  5. I agree with each word of this post and it makes me sad too..truth is what those in power make it..and it's been that way since forever I guess.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...