Skip to main content

Kashmiri Pandits: Some Facts

 


The latest issue of India Today [April 4] carries a detailed feature on the Kashmiri Pandits. It is worth looking at some of the facts presented by the weekly especially because the recent Bollywood movie has struck a raw nerve and evoked diverse reactions.

First of all, why were the Pandits targeted? The attack was not simply because of religious animosity as the film tries to make it out. India Today says that the Kashmiri Pandits accounted for just 4% of J&K’s population, “but their influence over the affairs of the state far exceeded their numbers.” The Pandits were an integral part of the ruling elite during the harsh Dogra rule. After Independence, the Pandits continued to occupy high positions in both the state and central government offices. Though they were only 4% of the population, 30% of the farmland in the state was owned by them. A major share of commerce was under their control.

India Today points out that there was “the famed spirit of Kashmiriyat or the centuries-old tradition of religious syncretism and communal harmony.” But, at the same time, there was resentment over the Pandit dominance in social, economic and political affairs. That resentment reached its peak in the late 1980s. Religion was not the major issue, in other words. It was more about exploitation from one side and the longing for justice on the other.

Secondly, it is not the BJP alone that looked after the interests of the Pandits after the 1990 massacre and exodus took place. The following illustration from India Today is eloquent in itself.


Manmohan Singh did quite a lot for the welfare of the Pandits. He did not advertise it. He did not use it for fomenting communal clashes and hatred in the country.

Thirdly, India Today argues that the Babri Masjid issue had its tremors in J&K. When the Masjid was opened to Hindus in 1986, Ghulam Mohammad Shah constructed prayer rooms for Muslims inside a Hindu temple in the civil secretariat, “provocatively declaring, ‘Islam khatre mein hai’ (Islam is in danger)”. This led to widespread communal riots in Kashmir. It set off the first wave of the exodus of Hindus from that state.

Fourthly, the appointment of Jagmohan as Governor of Kashmir in Jan 1990 did no good. The crackdown ordered by him alienated the Muslims of Kashmir from the Indian government. India Today says that Jagmohan was biased against the Muslims. He had asked the Pandits “to leave the Valley so that he could launch a crackdown on militants uninhibited by the fear that they would wreak revenge on the community.” Many things were done not in good faith, in other words.

Good faith is hard to get in politics especially in hard times. But solutions are impossible without good faith. Why the BJP under Modi’s leadership is least likely to solve the Muslim problem in India is precisely this lack of good faith. Jagmohan was as much responsible for the flight of the Pandits as the militants. Later he joined the BJP, the place where he would fit in neatly.

The killing of Mirwaiz Maulvi Farooq, the Valley’s popular spiritual mentor, and the subsequent killing of 52 Muslims by CRPF made Kashmir a complete chaos. There were still Muslim sheltering Pandits in good spirit. But such sporadic instances of camaraderie would be nothing more than lilies caught in a tempest. By the time Jagmohan was asked to resign as Governor, most Pandits had fled from Kashmir. Jagmohan’s governance caused as much havoc as Muslim militancy.

Kashmir saw more and more deaths in the years that followed. No government could bring peace to that state which once was a Paradise on Earth.

Now this movie, The Kashmir Files, is only adding fuel to the fire. You cannot solve a communal problem by projecting one side as villains and the other as victims. Solutions can never come from hearts that carry hatred in them. “The way forward is to win people’s hearts,” as Farooq Abdullah says in India Today’s interview. “Not a single Kashmiri Muslim will tell you that they don’t want the Hindus to come back,” says Abdullah. “But will this film promote their coming back?” And that’s the vital question whose rider is: Does Modi’s India want Hindus and Muslims to live in harmony together?

 

 

 

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. India Today has a right wing bias. Even they aren't happy with The Kashmir Files.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Literature and Meaning

Most people, almost all normal ones, live their lives by the stories they tell about themselves and those others tell about them. As psychologist Gerald Corey says, “These stories actually shape reality in that they construct and constitute what we see, feel, and do.” Your personality is not a static entity which took shape at your birth once and for all. As you grew up physically, you encountered a lot of other people, situations, and forces that contributed into the ongoing shaping of your personality even if you didn’t want all that shaping. Your life is a story that continues to be written till your death. You are the ultimate writer of your own story though a whole lot of others make significant contributions which you can’t ignore. Every Othello has to meet his Iago. But the plot need not necessitate the murder of Desdemona. Every Hamlet has to deal with the demons of fraudulence. Mark Antony has a choice to not “let Rome in Tiber melt” and thus rewrite his story. Your...

Vishwamitra: The King and the Ascetic

Vishwamitra and young Rama (Gemini AI) “O Rama, I shall teach you Bala and Atibala , the two secret mantras, which are the mother of all knowledge. By chanting them, you will never suffer from fatigue, hunger, thirst, or disease. You will shine among all beings, your intellect will be unmatched, and your strength will be extraordinary.” Rama was barely an adolescent when Sage Vishwamitra took him away from the comforts of the palace to the hardships of the forest. Dasharatha wasn’t quite happy to send his young son with the sage. How can a tender boy protect a mighty sage from rakshasas as powerful as Tataka and Subahu? Dasharatha is ready to send his entire army instead. He offers himself then. Vishwamitra reminds Dasharatha of his raja-dharma of upholding righteousness, even above personal emotions. If a sage asks for help, the king must honour the request. “Rama is no ordinary human child,” Vishwamitra tells Dasharatha. “He is born for a higher purpose.” When Vasistha, the ro...

Tara of Kishkindha

Tara and Rama as imagined by Gemini AI Tara was an apsara, a celestial nymph, who emerged from the ocean. When the gods and demons churned the ocean to obtain the nectar of immortality (Amrita), many divine beings and objects emerged. Tara was one of those precious entities. She was so stunningly beautiful that almost every man there – gods, demons, and the vanaras – wanted to marry her. According to certain Puranas, Lord Vishnu resolved the problem by declaring that the person standing on the right side of Tara would be her husband. Vali, the vanara, happened to be the lucky one. In Valmiki Ramayana, Tara is the daughter of a venerable vanara physician. Depending on where you read about her, Tara assumes multiple forms. The Puranas venerate her as one of the Panchakanyas, Five Holy Virgins, whose names are believed to have purifying and protective power when recited. Tara was not a virgin physically. She was the wife of both Vali and Sugriva, and had a son too. It is her moral qua...

The Silence of the Sarayu

By Gemini AI The Sarayu wept again. In silence. Sita had been swallowed by the earth. If I have been pure in thought, word, and deed, and have never once thought of any man but Rama, then, O Mother Earth, receive me into your bosom. Sita prayed and Bhumi Devi, Mother Earth, appeared personally to take Sita into her embrace. She vanished from the earth after that. Silence descended on Ayodhya. It engulfed Rama and Lakshmana and everyone else. The Sarayu was both a witness and a participant of all the sighs that underlay the silence. Rama fell into silence after Sita’s departure. He knew he was incomplete without Sita. He knew that words would have no meaning hereafter. The silence of the fissured heart is more eloquent than the music of apsaras. The Sarayu could feel the pulse of Rama’s silence as he sat on her shore looking into her depths for days on end. Words have had their time already. The Sarayu recalled how words fell from Sita’s noble lips when Rama asked her to u...