Skip to main content

Kashmiri Pandits: Some Facts

 


The latest issue of India Today [April 4] carries a detailed feature on the Kashmiri Pandits. It is worth looking at some of the facts presented by the weekly especially because the recent Bollywood movie has struck a raw nerve and evoked diverse reactions.

First of all, why were the Pandits targeted? The attack was not simply because of religious animosity as the film tries to make it out. India Today says that the Kashmiri Pandits accounted for just 4% of J&K’s population, “but their influence over the affairs of the state far exceeded their numbers.” The Pandits were an integral part of the ruling elite during the harsh Dogra rule. After Independence, the Pandits continued to occupy high positions in both the state and central government offices. Though they were only 4% of the population, 30% of the farmland in the state was owned by them. A major share of commerce was under their control.

India Today points out that there was “the famed spirit of Kashmiriyat or the centuries-old tradition of religious syncretism and communal harmony.” But, at the same time, there was resentment over the Pandit dominance in social, economic and political affairs. That resentment reached its peak in the late 1980s. Religion was not the major issue, in other words. It was more about exploitation from one side and the longing for justice on the other.

Secondly, it is not the BJP alone that looked after the interests of the Pandits after the 1990 massacre and exodus took place. The following illustration from India Today is eloquent in itself.


Manmohan Singh did quite a lot for the welfare of the Pandits. He did not advertise it. He did not use it for fomenting communal clashes and hatred in the country.

Thirdly, India Today argues that the Babri Masjid issue had its tremors in J&K. When the Masjid was opened to Hindus in 1986, Ghulam Mohammad Shah constructed prayer rooms for Muslims inside a Hindu temple in the civil secretariat, “provocatively declaring, ‘Islam khatre mein hai’ (Islam is in danger)”. This led to widespread communal riots in Kashmir. It set off the first wave of the exodus of Hindus from that state.

Fourthly, the appointment of Jagmohan as Governor of Kashmir in Jan 1990 did no good. The crackdown ordered by him alienated the Muslims of Kashmir from the Indian government. India Today says that Jagmohan was biased against the Muslims. He had asked the Pandits “to leave the Valley so that he could launch a crackdown on militants uninhibited by the fear that they would wreak revenge on the community.” Many things were done not in good faith, in other words.

Good faith is hard to get in politics especially in hard times. But solutions are impossible without good faith. Why the BJP under Modi’s leadership is least likely to solve the Muslim problem in India is precisely this lack of good faith. Jagmohan was as much responsible for the flight of the Pandits as the militants. Later he joined the BJP, the place where he would fit in neatly.

The killing of Mirwaiz Maulvi Farooq, the Valley’s popular spiritual mentor, and the subsequent killing of 52 Muslims by CRPF made Kashmir a complete chaos. There were still Muslim sheltering Pandits in good spirit. But such sporadic instances of camaraderie would be nothing more than lilies caught in a tempest. By the time Jagmohan was asked to resign as Governor, most Pandits had fled from Kashmir. Jagmohan’s governance caused as much havoc as Muslim militancy.

Kashmir saw more and more deaths in the years that followed. No government could bring peace to that state which once was a Paradise on Earth.

Now this movie, The Kashmir Files, is only adding fuel to the fire. You cannot solve a communal problem by projecting one side as villains and the other as victims. Solutions can never come from hearts that carry hatred in them. “The way forward is to win people’s hearts,” as Farooq Abdullah says in India Today’s interview. “Not a single Kashmiri Muslim will tell you that they don’t want the Hindus to come back,” says Abdullah. “But will this film promote their coming back?” And that’s the vital question whose rider is: Does Modi’s India want Hindus and Muslims to live in harmony together?

 

 

 

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. India Today has a right wing bias. Even they aren't happy with The Kashmir Files.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Taliban and India

Illustration by Copilot Designer Two things happened on 14 Oct 2025. One: India rolled out the red carpet for an Afghan delegation led by the Taliban Administration’s Foreign Minister. Two: a young man was forced to wash the feet of a Brahmin and drink that water. This happened in Madhya Pradesh, not too far from where the Taliban leaders were being given regal reception in tune with India’s philosophy of Atithi Devo Bhava (Guest is God). Afghanistan’s Taliban and India’s RSS (which shaped Modi’s thinking) have much in common. The former seeks to build a state based on its interpretation of Islamic law aiming for a society governed by strict religious codes. The RSS promotes Hindutva, the idea of India as primarily a Hindu nation, where Hindu values form the cultural and political foundation. Both fuse religious identity with national identity, marginalising those who don’t fit their vision of the nation. The man who was made to wash a Brahmin’s feet and drink that water in Madh...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...