Skip to main content

Kashmiri Pandits: Some Facts

 


The latest issue of India Today [April 4] carries a detailed feature on the Kashmiri Pandits. It is worth looking at some of the facts presented by the weekly especially because the recent Bollywood movie has struck a raw nerve and evoked diverse reactions.

First of all, why were the Pandits targeted? The attack was not simply because of religious animosity as the film tries to make it out. India Today says that the Kashmiri Pandits accounted for just 4% of J&K’s population, “but their influence over the affairs of the state far exceeded their numbers.” The Pandits were an integral part of the ruling elite during the harsh Dogra rule. After Independence, the Pandits continued to occupy high positions in both the state and central government offices. Though they were only 4% of the population, 30% of the farmland in the state was owned by them. A major share of commerce was under their control.

India Today points out that there was “the famed spirit of Kashmiriyat or the centuries-old tradition of religious syncretism and communal harmony.” But, at the same time, there was resentment over the Pandit dominance in social, economic and political affairs. That resentment reached its peak in the late 1980s. Religion was not the major issue, in other words. It was more about exploitation from one side and the longing for justice on the other.

Secondly, it is not the BJP alone that looked after the interests of the Pandits after the 1990 massacre and exodus took place. The following illustration from India Today is eloquent in itself.


Manmohan Singh did quite a lot for the welfare of the Pandits. He did not advertise it. He did not use it for fomenting communal clashes and hatred in the country.

Thirdly, India Today argues that the Babri Masjid issue had its tremors in J&K. When the Masjid was opened to Hindus in 1986, Ghulam Mohammad Shah constructed prayer rooms for Muslims inside a Hindu temple in the civil secretariat, “provocatively declaring, ‘Islam khatre mein hai’ (Islam is in danger)”. This led to widespread communal riots in Kashmir. It set off the first wave of the exodus of Hindus from that state.

Fourthly, the appointment of Jagmohan as Governor of Kashmir in Jan 1990 did no good. The crackdown ordered by him alienated the Muslims of Kashmir from the Indian government. India Today says that Jagmohan was biased against the Muslims. He had asked the Pandits “to leave the Valley so that he could launch a crackdown on militants uninhibited by the fear that they would wreak revenge on the community.” Many things were done not in good faith, in other words.

Good faith is hard to get in politics especially in hard times. But solutions are impossible without good faith. Why the BJP under Modi’s leadership is least likely to solve the Muslim problem in India is precisely this lack of good faith. Jagmohan was as much responsible for the flight of the Pandits as the militants. Later he joined the BJP, the place where he would fit in neatly.

The killing of Mirwaiz Maulvi Farooq, the Valley’s popular spiritual mentor, and the subsequent killing of 52 Muslims by CRPF made Kashmir a complete chaos. There were still Muslim sheltering Pandits in good spirit. But such sporadic instances of camaraderie would be nothing more than lilies caught in a tempest. By the time Jagmohan was asked to resign as Governor, most Pandits had fled from Kashmir. Jagmohan’s governance caused as much havoc as Muslim militancy.

Kashmir saw more and more deaths in the years that followed. No government could bring peace to that state which once was a Paradise on Earth.

Now this movie, The Kashmir Files, is only adding fuel to the fire. You cannot solve a communal problem by projecting one side as villains and the other as victims. Solutions can never come from hearts that carry hatred in them. “The way forward is to win people’s hearts,” as Farooq Abdullah says in India Today’s interview. “Not a single Kashmiri Muslim will tell you that they don’t want the Hindus to come back,” says Abdullah. “But will this film promote their coming back?” And that’s the vital question whose rider is: Does Modi’s India want Hindus and Muslims to live in harmony together?

 

 

 

Comments

  1. Pooja MahimkarMarch 28, 2022 at 10:28 PM

    This was super informative

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalMarch 29, 2022 at 5:34 AM

      India Today has a right wing bias. Even they aren't happy with The Kashmir Files.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl
47 comments
Read more

Bihar Election

Satish Acharya's Cartoon on how votes were bought in Bihar My wife has been stripped of her voting rights in the revised electoral roll. She has always been a conscientious voter unlike me. I refused to vote in the last Lok Sabha election though I stood outside the polling booth for Maggie to perform what she claimed was her duty as a citizen. The irony now is that she, the dutiful citizen, has been stripped of the right, while I, the ostensible renegade gets the right that I don’t care for. Since the Booth Level Officer [BLO] was my neighbour, he went out of his way to ring up some higher officer, sitting in my house, to enquire about Maggie’s exclusion. As a result, I was given the assurance that he, the BLO, would do whatever was in his power to get my wife her voting right. More than the voting right, what really bothered me was whether the Modi government was going to strip my wife of her Indian citizenship. Anything is possible in Modi’s India: Modi hai to Mumkin hai .   ...
16 comments
Read more

Nehru’s Secularism

Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, and Narendra Modi, the present one, are diametrically opposite to each other. Take any parameter, from boorishness to sophistication or religious views, and these two men would remain poles apart. Is it Nehru’s towering presence in history that intimidates Modi into hurling ceaseless allegations against him? Today, 14 Nov, is Nehru’s birth anniversary and Modi’s tweet was uncharacteristically terse. It said, “Tributes to former Prime Minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Ji on the occasion of his birth anniversary.” Somebody posted a trenchant cartoon in the comments section.  Nehru had his flaws, no doubt. He was as human as Modi. But what made him a giant while Modi remains a dwarf – as in the cartoon above – is the way they viewed human beings. For Nehru, all human beings mattered, irrespective of their caste, creed, language, etc. His concept of secularism stands a billion notches above Modi’s Hindutva-nationalism. Nehru’s ide...
14 comments
Read more

The Art of Subjugation: A Case Study

Two Pulaya women, 1926 [Courtesy Mathrubhumi ] The Pulaya and Paraya communities were the original landowners in Kerala until the Brahmins arrived from the North with their religion and gods. They did not own the land individually; the lands belonged to the tribes. Then in the 8 th – 10 th centuries CE, the Brahmins known as Namboothiris in Kerala arrived and deceived the Pulayas and Parayas lock, stock, and barrel. With the help of religion. The Namboothiris proclaimed themselves the custodians of all wealth by divine mandate. They possessed the Vedic and Sanskrit mantras and tantras to prove their claims. The aboriginal people of Kerala couldn’t make head or tail of concepts such as Brahmadeya (land donated to Brahmins becoming sacred land) or Manu’s injunctions such as: “Land given to a Brahmin should never be taken back” [8.410] or “A king who confiscates land from Brahmins incurs sin” [8.394]. The Brahmins came, claimed certain powers given by the gods, and started exploi...
15 comments
Read more

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...
19 comments
Read more