Skip to main content

The other side of sedition

Media Watch


The sedition law got much media attention in the past week, thanks to the Supreme Court’s freezing of the colonial law. Not one newspaper or magazine that I read supports the sedition law. Every one of them welcomes and appreciates the SC’s interim order.

Writing in the Hindustan Times of 13 May, former judge of the SC, Deepak Gupta, asserts in no uncertain terms that the “sedition law has no place in a democracy.” Who wants to retain such an antiquated law? Those who are afraid of criticism do. Stifling criticism is to create a police state, argues Gupta. Certain restrictions are required when it comes to freedom of expression. No nation can afford to compromise its security, foreign relationships, public order, decency and morality. But putting charges of sedition on people who criticise the government’s policies is to invite troubles.

Gupta quotes Mahatma Gandhi who was arrested for sedition by the British. “Affection (for the government or country) cannot be manufactured or regulated by law,” said Gandhi. “If one has no affection for a person or system, one should be free to give the fullest expression to his disaffection, so long as he does not contemplate, promote or incite to violence.” The disaffection that Gandhi was referring to was the one mentioned in Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code which criminalises “exciting disaffection against the government”. Gupta implicitly suggests that no government with self-confidence requires the sedition law.

The Times of India’s editorial on 12 May bluntly asks the government to scrap the sedition law. “Don’t just reform – remove,” screamed the title of the editorial. Even a mild version of the law will be misused, the editor thinks. This law in any shape will provide the opportunity for politicians to settle scores with rivals or critics. The newspaper goes on to say that even UAPA needs be scrapped.

The Free Press Journal’s editorial of 13 May mentions that about 13,000 people are in prisons now charged with sedition. The number alone hints at the blatant misuse of the law. Many of these prisoner won’t be convicted since their crimes won’t amount to anything like sedition. But the mere detention is punishment.

The Morning Standard also mentions the number 13,000 and adds that 60% of them were implicated after the BJP came to power at the centre. The newspaper’s editorial (12 May) states explicitly that the ruling party is abusing the law.

D Raja of the CPI wrote an article in the Indian Express of 13 May arguing vociferously against the sedition law and added that cases under the UAPA have increased by about 75% between 2017 and 2020. The BJP is obviously too scared of criticism. The party does need a stronger backbone.

*

The Open magazine has Siddharth Singh writing a long article about the freebies being given to people by governments for the sake of (cheap) popularity. Interestingly, the writer cites examples only from Punjab and Rajasthan, two non-BJP states. One wonders why he fails to see more freebies being given by the Modi government as well as the BJP state governments.

His question is valid, however. Should governments indulge in such populist measures which are rather costly by any criterion? Shouldn’t governments focus on policies and acts that bring in welfare for all instead of select groups? Shouldn’t governments have clearer vision about brighter future for all people instead of giving alms to the people?

*

The Week this time has dedicated half of its pages to the preeminent Bengali film maker, Satyajit Ray. His classical movie Pather Panchali has survived 7 decades. The Week argues that the contemporary Bengali cinema is too substandard in comparison with Ray’s movies. There is a parallel decline in Bengali literature too. It is quite amazing that a people that had artists and writers who scaled enviable peaks of excellence are now fumbling in the dark alleys of mediocrity. What has happened to Bengal? The Week wonders.


*

That question about Bengal can be extended to the whole of India now, I think. That is quite tragic. Why are we obsessed with the past? Why are we interested in the dark chambers of the Taj Mahal instead of the bright possibilities that should be explored for the sake of the emerging young population of the country? Why are we stuck in the quagmire of history instead of dealing with the present and its innumerable problems?

PS. Last Media Watch:  Exotic India

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    Top notch round up again, my friend! Interesting that there is starting to be a revolt against the sedition law - do the voices for this run risk themselves? Here in the UK, the government is seeking to finalise a bill that will give the police greater powers to detain anyone protesting, such as environmental activists, women's rights, race rights, workers rights... in other words, criticism of the ruling party by raising a banner is likely to land one in gaol. Backward indeed... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a good sign that the Indian media gathered the courage to speak this much. Let's hope things will change for the better.

      Delete
  2. Our 'leaders' wish to dwell in the past as they have no vision for the future and they wish to keep the populace numb in the past.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. Lack of vision keeps us rooted in the past.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

Taliban and India

Illustration by Copilot Designer Two things happened on 14 Oct 2025. One: India rolled out the red carpet for an Afghan delegation led by the Taliban Administration’s Foreign Minister. Two: a young man was forced to wash the feet of a Brahmin and drink that water. This happened in Madhya Pradesh, not too far from where the Taliban leaders were being given regal reception in tune with India’s philosophy of Atithi Devo Bhava (Guest is God). Afghanistan’s Taliban and India’s RSS (which shaped Modi’s thinking) have much in common. The former seeks to build a state based on its interpretation of Islamic law aiming for a society governed by strict religious codes. The RSS promotes Hindutva, the idea of India as primarily a Hindu nation, where Hindu values form the cultural and political foundation. Both fuse religious identity with national identity, marginalising those who don’t fit their vision of the nation. The man who was made to wash a Brahmin’s feet and drink that water in Madh...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...