Skip to main content

Streisand Effect

Barbra Streisand and her bungalow


Streisand Effect is a kind of boomerang. I had no idea about this until I read an article in a Malayalam weekly this morning. The article was discussing the BBC documentary on Modi and the Indian government’s response to it. The writer of the article says that BBC should be grateful to the Modi government for all the publicity it got because of the government’s attempts to ban the documentary in India.

There is nothing new in the documentary. Whatever is mentioned in its both parts together is already known to anyone who has cared to study the 2002 Gujarat riots and their aftermath. Most people wouldn’t have taken the documentary seriously had it been left to its normal course.

The article mentioned above cites the example of what happened to American singer and actress Barbra Streisand. She filed a case against photographer Kenneth Adelman and got results that were just the opposite of whatever she wanted.

Adelman was the founder of the California Coastal Records Project. He photographed the coastline of the state from a helicopter for the project. The photos were posted to the Internet and made copyright-free. There were 12,000 photos one of which was of the bungalow belonging to Ms Streisand. The lady took Adelman to court for allegedly violating her privacy. She demanded $50 million as compensation.

She lost the case. Worse, she was asked to pay $175,000 to Alderman for covering his expenditure related to the case. Still worse, until the case was filed only six people had downloaded the concerned photo and two among the six were the lady’s lawyers. But within a month of the filing of the case, 420,000 people downloaded the pic.

What Ms Streisand wanted was to protect her privacy. What she got was wide publicity. This is known as Streisand Effect. Britannica Encyclopaedia defines Streisand Effect as a “phenomenon in which an attempt to censor, hide, or otherwise draw attention away from something only serves to attract more attention to it.”

If the Indian government had just left the documentary alone, it would have just come and gone like any other TV programme. But the government’s kneejerk reaction kicked up a lot of discussion and debate on Modi’s actual role in what came to be labelled by many as ‘genocide’. India’s censorship of the documentary drew global attention, says the article mentioned above. All prominent news agencies gave it much importance.

Will Modi ask Mukesh Ambani to buy up the BBC now?


Comments

  1. Yamini MacLeanFebruary 5, 2023 at 10:13 AM

    Hari OM
    The BBC does not require such increase of awareness; it is one broadcaster that is known the world over. The point is well made, though. We had an example of the Streisand Effect here when the ex-chancellor decided it was wise to threaten a journalist with lawsuits for bringing to light the possibility of his having done dodgy tax stuff whilst in office. He is now out of office. No smoke without fire and all that! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalFebruary 5, 2023 at 10:37 AM

      Of course, the BBC has its worldwide recognition as well as popularity. When we were young, we were made to listen to the BBC news in order to improve our English and also to give us the most reliable kind of news. The credibility of the broadcaster is beyond question. Nevertheless, this documentary on Modi wouldn't have got such publicity had it not been for the censorship precisely because it doesn't add any new info about the issue.

      Delete
  2. Pandian RamaiahFebruary 5, 2023 at 8:15 PM

    So far, the negative publicity has worked to the advantage of the magician Modi. It is uncommon to see him afraid of a documentary, which has only increased its publicity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalFebruary 5, 2023 at 8:45 PM

      Publicity matters in the end, even negative publicity!

      Delete
  3. Rajeev MoothedathFebruary 5, 2023 at 10:31 PM

    I read this up recently when Shashi Tharoor referred to Streisand effect in an interview with Barkha Dutt on the BBC handling fiasco. Your last line in this post is classic!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalFebruary 6, 2023 at 4:24 AM

      Tharoor is both knowledgeable and principled. We need more people like him in politics.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...
39 comments
Read more

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...
30 comments
Read more

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...
16 comments
Read more

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...
47 comments
Read more

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...
24 comments
Read more