Skip to main content

Quasi-Humans



Book Review


Title: Soft Animal

Author: Meenakshi Reddy Madhavan

Publisher: Penguin Random House India, 2023

Pages: 261

 


Very many people – too many, in fact – live partial lives. That is, most people don’t explore the depths of anything: the meaning of their life, of their love, of their religion, whatever. There is no passion about anything. Consequently, life becomes dull, even painful.

This novel is about the dull pain experienced by a woman in her mid-thirties. She is married to a rich man who was in a love-relationship with her for long enough before marriage. He is an IT professional and she is a homemaker. Mukund Chugh and Mallika Rao. A rich Punjabi boy and the not-so-rich “south Indian girl” (as her in-laws refer to her). Mukund is a good guy. Mallika, the first-person narrator tells us that “All my life I had wanted to be with someone like Mukund, someone so sure of themselves and their identity.” But disillusionment follows soon enough. Entering into married life with him is like Alice going to Wonderland and meeting there the children down the road with whom she played every day instead of the Mad Hatter and the Red Queen. There is no magic in this Wonderland called marriage.

Covid-19 breaks out, adding to the misery. Mukund starts working from home. He is online all the time. Mallika cannot go out either due to the incessant lockdowns. She gets bored, naturally. This novel is the story of her boredom. Her inability to deal with it. Her lack of passion. Her quasi-life. As well as that of the others.

Her pregnancy should have come as a rescue to Mallika. But it doesn’t. On the contrary, she hates it. She wants to abort the foetus which she calls ‘The Cells’. Mallika has not learnt to appreciate the worth of human life. She has not learnt what it means to be human. And she doesn’t try either.

The ‘soft animal’ of the title comes from a poem of Mary Oliver. “You do not have to be good. / You do not have to walk on your knees / for a hundred miles through the desert repenting. / You only have to let the soft animal of your body / love what it loves.”

Mallika doesn’t know what the soft animal of her body loves. And she doesn’t try to find it out either. Instead she blames Mukund for being insensitive. He is insensitive, at least as much as any ordinary man who gets on with his regular job and commitments. “Mukund isn’t stupid,” Mallika informs us, “he just chooses not to notice things, which makes me even angrier than if he were actually unaware of the fact that other people have feelings and emotions, and are whole, complex beasts, just like him.”

The novel doesn’t take us anywhere beyond that ubiquitous bestiality of the human race. That’s the problem with it. It leaves us without giving us anything deep to think of, with a feeling that life is nothing more than a protracted tolerance of inescapable nausea.

The first many chapters gave me the feeling that it was just a shallow entertainer with its wit and brainy aphorisms. Quite like Anuja Chauhan’s works. But as I moved into the middle of the novel, I understood that Meenakshi Reddy Madhavan is serious, wants to be serious at least.

There is a soft animal, a real one, in the novel, a constant companion to Mallika. It is a dog that Mallika’s parents had rescued from a cruel owner. The dog is scared of people because of what it had endured for long. But it is submissive. Receptive. Quite listless too. Soft. Is Mallika finding a parallel to her in that helpless creature? But Mallika isn’t as helpless. She is assertive. She has the freedom to do a lot of things including sitting on the balcony and drinking wine, smoking cigarettes, eating organic veg, buying books and posting pictures on Instagram. And more. If she doesn’t go beyond that when she has every opportunity to, then whose mistake is it?

Mallika’s is a quasi-life as is everybody else’s is in the novel. But too many quasi-lives don’t make good literature.

PS. This post is part of Bookish League blog hop hosted by Bohemian Bibliophile.

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    sounds like the author might fare better writing for soap operas... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Doesn't seem to be a book I might enjoy. Sounds quite depressing. Thanks for sharing your thoughts

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It entertained me in the beginning and then it became a pain, depressing at the end.

      Delete
  3. I really like your hard-hitting no-nonsense review. Also, the comparison of Mallika with a rescued dog who just stays in a corner of the house seems interesting. Being a feminist I still wish to read the book to find for myself how I feel about Mallika's privileged life. I think privilege comes from the ability to make choices, and being able to say "No" when you wish to say no.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The book received more generous reviews from the media. But I found the lack of depth offputting.

      Delete
  4. you can read more blogs on my site check out https://saboor.rankbrainmarketing.link/

    ReplyDelete
  5. From your review it's evident that the book lacks depth. If it's a story of mundane life, even writers can bring out the extraordinary from ordinary tales and present them in exciting ways. Here is the talent to show your writing prowess, and I think this is somehow missed in the novel. - Swarnali Nath (The Blissful Storyteller)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I won't mind saying that the author of this book stands in need of tremendous introspection.

      Delete
  6. Interesting review. I have not read this novel, but I have read the author's older novel 'You are here' aeons ago.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I haven't read this author. The basic plot seems interesting, but then your review makes it sound like a slow, monotonous kind of read, which I might not enjoy unless I connect with the writing style. How is her writing style?

    I typically read sample chapters before buying a book, but you said that the beginning is interesting and later it becomes depressing, so I think I'll avoid. The cover is also very dull thud. Thank you for the review.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Style is an elusive affair. There are as many styles as there are individuals.

      Meenakshi can be good entertainment with her wit. She's intelligent.

      Delete
  8. It doesn't sound like a book I would enjoy. I find contemporary relationship-based novels quite banal. I would rather walk into a new world, so prefer fantasy and historical fiction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand you. I too don't like novels of this type which put me off for a few days. I bought this being misled by a review.

      Delete
  9. When I'd read what this book was about I was very intrigued, given how relevant some of the themes can be to anyone. I was almost scared at the thought of reading it and I'm not even in a relationship. But I think I loved your review of it more, however. Such an honest take on empowerment and helping oneself, loved it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There has to be some possibility of redemption too, which is totally absent in this book!

      Delete
  10. 'Mallika’s is a quasi-life as is everybody else’s is in the novel. But too many quasi-lives don’t make good literature." You last line sealed the deal for me. I think many people assume that true literature is about boring sermons and flawed humans. In reality though, true literature is about making the reader think, and more importantly, feel!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wondered again and again why Penguin took up its publication. There are certain standards we expect from certain publishers.

      Delete
  11. "Mallika’s is a quasi-life as is everybody else’s is in the novel. But too many quasi-lives don’t make good literature." Your conclusion husked the book beautifully. And it also made me wonder about the publishing standards of the famed publications in India.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The author lives in a place and time that probably thrives on superficiality. But it is the duty of the writer to surpass the superficiality of given existence.

      Delete
  12. Mundane lives often make up for mundane literature. What's worse is that we aren't even willing to imagine beyond it. Many established publishing places have often disappointed me with their choice of manuscripts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Competition, Sonia. It is ruthless. Writing is finding it hard to survive these days!

      Delete
  13. Reading of lives and emotions unexplored makes me worry that so many of us might be doing the same.
    Possibly the book wanted to express the dullness in totality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's entirely possible. But there has to be something in a novel that the reader carries with her, something more than the dullness. See how Waiting for Godot presents dullness.

      Delete
  14. Well I dont know how much I am correct in interpreting the character of Mallika from your review but I smell it like a typical housewife like character ready to enjoy a privileged life given by husband and demands the attention and time always being at home. The world is very big and honestly we need to have a connection with the outer world rather than sitting at home and enjoying luxury gifted by husband. If you need attention, respect and own identity you need to connect yourself with outer world. I am always vocal about the fact that every women on earth in today's time need to be independent and financially independent to make her own place rather than playing a victim card and blaming partner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd agree with you on these points. A woman is entitled to her identity, freedom and choices. But Mallika has the freedom to discover all these. Instead of doing that, she goes around blaming the foetus and trying to abort it. Well, I found this character absolutely disgusting.

      Delete
  15. I enjoyed reading your straight-talk review as well as the comments from the community. Going on a limb here to connect the book with TV shows and movies. To depict mundane life purely for entertainment or monetary benefit might be appealing to some segments of the audience. Personally I find it’s worth reading reviews like yours to assertion if the book is impactful, thought provoking or emotionally engaging or is it merely a time pass.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I often get the feeling that writers today need to experience the agonies of life personally in order to acquire depth of thinking. This author seems to have had too easy a life.

      Delete
    2. I agree. Experience shapes thinking and creativity.

      Delete
  16. I can't quite make up my mind about Mallika from your review. I want to sympathise with her as I can understand how terrible it would be to live with an insensitive man and yet despite being a free-thinking woman she chooses to live on with him. The first part of the book is witty, that should make for a good read yet it sounds kind of slow. Blaming her unborn baby for her troubles is another thing I could not understand. Seems like a mixed up book where the author cannot makeup her mind about what she wants to convey.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She doesn't exactly blame the unborn child. She doesn't even think of it as a child. Cells, she calls it. That sort of misanthropy doesn't suit a character with whom we are expected to sympathise.

      I think the author stretches women's liberation too far.

      Delete
  17. Besides the fact that this book doesn't interest me at all, it is saddening to know that people live such lives (I had to google this new form of life). I'm just in conversation with someone who is always having issues even though she has everything in life. Surely, she is unaware of the depth of the numerous blessings she has.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Discontent is a serious problem and good writers have tackled it dexterously earlier, like Sartre's Nausea.

      Delete
  18. I was looking forward to reading this author's next book but after reading your review I am not too sure if I want to pick it up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you liked her earlier work, give this a try. After all, this received some favorable reviews too. I look at novels from a classical point of view which demands an empathetic understanding of humans.

      Delete
  19. I love that quote about having a soft animal inside us! It's quite interesting how that's been put. At first glance this doesn't seem like a book I would pick up but the concept has me intrigued. Great review!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That soft animal is to be discovered, understood and nourished... But the protagonist of this novel fails all through and hence remains a disappointment to the reader at the end.

      Delete
  20. I had not heard of this book or the author before so was glad to know. I can probably give it a try considering Mallika is such a flawed character. Really appreciate how honestly you reviewed this book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Give it a try is what I'd say too. You may discover something that I failed to.

      Delete
  21. Boring as it may be, many people are actually living this life everyday. And that makes this book real. But yes, unless, we ourselves are in a situation like the one Mallika is in, it is a dragging story, at least that's my impression from your review.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Though the story may be boring, but many people are actually living this life, every day. Imagine that. And that's what makes this book real. And yet, for those who cannot relate to the story will certainly find it slow and dragging.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wouldn't say the story drags. In fact, very slow plots can be gipping in their own ways. Example, Waiting for Godot of Samuel Beckett. Such a slow play where nothing happens for the whole hour and yet we stay glued to it.

      It's not the pace. It's not the dullness of the protagnonist's life. It's the author's inability to extract our empathy for the protagonist or any character in the novel.

      Delete
  23. What a well-written review! "This novel is the story of her boredom." is one of the most wow remarks I've read in a review. Your review tells me the book is perhaps addressing more than one theme at once, with of course Mallika's discontent being central. But I'd read this one to first hand understand how the author deals with this theme for the protagonist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do read. You may have a different view on it.

      Delete
    2. Honestly, not my cup of tea. Looks like a very slow and sounds quite depressing. Thanks for sharing it in detail.

      Delete
    3. I wouldn't describe it as slow really. Superficial. That's it.

      Delete
  24. I’m very familiar with Meenakshi’s writing because I’ve followed her from days as a popular blogger back in the early 2000s (Compulsive Confessor). I also read her first couple of books and realised they were barely-fictionalised versions of her own life as clear from her blog. I think you’ve described the lack of a certain depth in her writing really well. She wants to reach it but is unable to. Perhaps some day she will.
    Noor Anand Chawla

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She will reach the depth, Noor, I'm sure. I love the search, the quest, the yearning. I'm pretty sure het next character is going to have depth and that's going to be her best seller.

      Delete
  25. Oh it's too depressing for my taste. But thanks for letting us know about the book :)

    ReplyDelete
  26. Loved the review. Though I think the text might be a tad bit slow for me. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Haven't read any books by the author. This one is not the kind I would be interested in. Seems superficial and stagnant. That said, all authors have their readers and the book has probably found its readers too.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Thank you so much for participating in the blog hop. It was an honor having you on board.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Second Crucifixion

  ‘The Second Crucifixion’ is the title of the last chapter of Dominique Lapierre and Larry Collins’s magnum opus Freedom at Midnight . The sub-heading is: ‘New Delhi, 30 January 1948’. Seventy-three years ago, on that day, a great soul was shot dead by a man who was driven by the darkness of hatred. Gandhi has just completed his usual prayer session. He had recited a prayer from the Gita:                         For certain is death for the born                         and certain is birth for the dead;                         Therefore over the inevitable                         Thou shalt not grieve . At that time Narayan Apte and Vishnu Karkare were moving to Retiring Room Number 6 at the Old Delhi railway station. They walked like thieves not wishing to be noticed by anyone. The early morning’s winter fog of Delhi gave them the required wrap. They found Nathuram Godse already awake in the retiring room. The three of them sat together and finalised the plot against Gand

The Final Farewell

Book Review “ Death ends life, not a relationship ,” as Mitch Albom put it. That is why, we have so many rituals associated with death. Minakshi Dewan’s book, The Final Farewell [HarperCollins, 2023], is a well-researched book about those rituals. The book starts with an elaborate description of the Sikh rituals associated with death and cremation, before moving on to Islam, Zoroastrianism, Christianity, and finally Hinduism. After that, it’s all about the various traditions and related details of Hindu final rites. A few chapters are dedicated to the problems of widows in India, gender discrimination in the last rites, and the problem of unclaimed dead bodies. There is a chapter titled ‘Grieving Widows in Hindi Cinema’ too. Death and its rituals form an unusual theme for a book. Frankly, I don’t find the topic stimulating in any way. Obviously, I didn’t buy this book. It came to me as quite many other books do – for reasons of their own. I read the book finally, having shelv

Vultures and Religion

When vultures become extinct, why should a religion face a threat? “When the vultures died off, they stopped eating the bodies of Zoroastrians…” I was amused as I went on reading the book The Final Farewell by Minakshi Dewan. The book is about how the dead are dealt with by people of different religious persuasions. Dead people are quite useless, unless you love euphemism. Or, as they say, dead people tell no tales. In the end, we are all just stories made by people like the religious woman who wrote the epitaph for her atheist husband: “Here lies an atheist, all dressed up and no place to go.” Zoroastrianism is a religion which converts death into a sordid tale by throwing the corpses of its believers to vultures. Death makes one impure, according to that religion. Well, I always thought, and still do, that life makes one impure. I have the support of Lord Buddha on that. Life is dukkha , said the Enlightened. That is, suffering, dissatisfaction and unease. Death is liberation

Cats and Love

No less a psychologist than Freud said that the “time spent with cats is never wasted.” I find time to spend with cats precisely for that reason. They are not easy to love, particularly if they are the country variety which are not quite tameable, and mine are those. What makes my love affair with my cats special is precisely their unwillingness to befriend me. They’d rather be in their own company. “In ancient time, cats were worshipped as gods; they have not forgotten this,” Terry Pratchett says. My cats haven’t, I’m sure. Pratchett knew what he was speaking about because he loved cats which appear frequently in his works. Pratchett’s cats love independence, very unlike dogs. Dogs come when you call them; cats take a message and get back to you as and when they please. I don’t have dogs. But my brother’s dogs visit us – Maggie and me – every evening. We give them something to eat and they love that. They spend time with us after eating. My cats just go away without even a look af