Skip to main content

Gandhi yet again


Book Review

 


Title: Gandhi: A Life in Three Campaigns

Author: M J Akbar

Publisher: Bloomsbury, 2023

Pages: 250


You can love this man or hate him, but you cannot ignore him. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi is the man, aka the Mahatma. The amount of hatred that is spewed on social media day after day, after Mr Modi became the Prime Minister of India, is simply stounding. Right now there is a social media campaign going on to get Mahatma Gandhi’s picture removed from the country’s currency notes. It is possible that Narendra Modi’s picture will replace the Mahatma’s sooner than any sane Indian would expect. In such a context, yet another biography of the Mahatma is not out of place.

This biography is written by a man who was inducted into the Union Council of Ministers by no less a personage than Narendra Modi himself. M J Akbar was an eminent journalist before he chose to join Modi’s cabinet for reasons known only to him. The regal association ended when a charge of sexual harassment was raised against him by a fellow journalist in those farcically entertaining Me-Too days.

Politics aside, Akbar is a good writer, though journalistic, and this new book on Mahatma Gandhi is well-written. It is required too at a time when the Mahatma is under attack from too many quarters, ignorant quarters. Evil quarters, should I add? Today’s youth in India have frighteningly distorted notions about Gandhi. When I mention the name of Gandhi in class, my students think of Rahul Gandhi. Most youngsters don’t even seem to have heard of Mahatma Gandhi! If they have, it is from Mr Narendra Modi or his political party. No good.

Hence a book on Gandhi is welcome. And I must say that Akbar has done a fairly good job with it. He has divided the book into three sections, three campaigns: Nonviolence, Untouchability, and Do-or-Die. But these are nothing more than journalistic labels that become convenient to construct a narrative.

It's good that Akbar, a BJP man, thought about writing a book on Mahatma Gandhi. The BJP is a party whose prime leader will gladly garland both the Mahatma and his killer if the media were totally under his control.

The entire right-wing in India is convinced that Mahatma Gandhi was responsible for the partition of India. A lot more sins are heaped on the head of the great visionary Mahatma by Modi’s right wing. All the obeisance displayed by Modi on occasions like Gandhi Jayanti is mere sham. Modi hates the Mahatma. Modi is a personification of hatred even as Hitler was. India is becoming a country whose soul is suffused with that hatred. Alas!

In such a time, it is great that a BJP man thought of writing a book on Mahatma Gandhi’s greatness. For those who are familiar with the history of India’s freedom struggle, this book has little new to offer. But the youngsters who think of Gandhi as a villain just because of Narendra Modi’s dubiousness may find this book useful. After all, it is written by a BJP man. So, go ahead and read it, young friend, if you want to know India and its Mahatma better.

I’m driven to quote a few lines from the book.

Nehru … wrote from Dehra Dun jail on 5 May 1933: ‘Religion is not familiar ground for me, and as I have grown older I have definitely drifted away from it. I suppose I have something else in its place, something other than just intellect, reason, which gives me strength and hope…. Religion seems to me to lead to emotion and sentimentality and they are still more unreliable guides.’ [p.140]

Gandhi’s deep sympathy for Jews did not blind him to any injustice against Arabs in Palestine under British rule. ‘Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French… The nobler course would be to insist on a just treatment of the Jews wherever they are born and bred.’  [Gandhi wrote.] [p.148]

Nehru could not accept the centrality of religion in Gandhi’s weltanschauung, or view of life, and Gandhi looked askance at notions like class war, the fashionable shorthand solution of leftists. For Gandhi, the village was the centre and source of India’s regeneration, while Nehru the moderniser’s answers lay in urban industrialisation. In Gandhi’s India, villagers would not be dull, nor would they ‘live like an animal in filth and darkness’…. Every village would be a republic with a panchayat exercising full powers, linked in ever-widening but never-ascending circles. Life would be an ocean, not a pyramid. [p.203]

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    I too am glad there is someone keeping the record straight... No leader is perfect, but some are definitely more noble than others. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gandhi doesn't deserve the vilification he's getting from the right wing these days, whatever his failings were. So this book is relevant.

      Delete
  2. Wow, interesting. I had no idea he was being vilified nowadays. It's funny how different eras change their perspectives on those that came before.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The present vilification will vanish from history like mist clearing when the sun shines. Some heroes don't stand the test of time and India's present hero belongs to that category.

      Delete
  3. This is a thought-provoking review that highlights the complexities surrounding Gandhi's legacy, particularly in today's political climate. It's interesting to see a BJP figure like M J Akbar taking on the task of writing about Gandhi, given the ideological differences within the current political landscape. The way the book is positioned for young readers, who may have only heard of Gandhi through a political lens, makes it all the more relevant. Great insights!

    Read my new blog post: https://www.melodyjacob.com/2024/10/cozy-up-for-christmas-my-favorite.html Wishing you a happy weekend.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Florentino’s Many Loves

Florentino Ariza has had 622 serious relationships (combo pack with sex) apart from numerous fleeting liaisons before he is able to embrace the only woman whom he loved with all his heart and soul. And that embrace happens “after a long and troubled love affair” that lasted 51 years, 9 months, and 4 days. Florentino is in his late 70s when he is able to behold, and hold as well, the very body of his beloved Fermina, who is just a few years younger than him. She now stands before him with her wrinkled shoulders, sagged breasts, and flabby skin that is as pale and cold as a frog’s. It is the culmination of a long, very long, wait as far as Florentino is concerned, the end of his passionate quest for his holy grail. “I’ve remained a virgin for you,” he says. All those 622 and more women whose details filled the 25 diaries that he kept writing with meticulous devotion have now vanished into thin air. They mean nothing now that he has reached where he longed to reach all his life. The

Unromantic Men

Romance is a tenderness of the heart. That is disappearing even from the movies. Tenderness of heart is not a virtue anymore; it is a weakness. Who is an ideal man in today’s world? Shakespeare’s Romeo and Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay’s Devdas would be considered as fools in today’s world in which the wealthiest individuals appear on elite lists, ‘strong’ leaders are hailed as nationalist heroes, and success is equated with anything other than traditional virtues. The protagonist of Colleen McCullough’s 1977 novel, The Thorn Birds [which sold more than 33 million copies], is torn between his idealism and his natural weaknesses as a human being. Ralph de Bricassart is a young Catholic priest who is sent on a kind of punishment-appointment to a remote rural area of Australia where the Cleary family arrives from New Zealand in 1921 to take care of the enormous estate of Mary Carson who is Paddy Cleary’s own sister. Meggy Cleary is the only daughter of Paddy and Fiona who have eight so

Yesterday

With students of Carmel Margaret, are you grieving / Over Goldengrove unleaving…? It was one of my first days in the eleventh class of Carmel Public School in Kerala, the last school of my teaching career. One girl, whose name was not Margaret, was in the class looking extremely melancholy. I had noticed her for a few days. I didn’t know how to put the matter over to her. I had already told the students that a smiling face was a rule in the English class. Since Margaret didn’t comply, I chose to drag Hopkins in. I replaced the name of Margaret with the girl’s actual name, however, when I quoted the lines. Margaret is a little girl in the Hopkins poem. Looking at autumn’s falling leaves, Margaret is saddened by the fact of life’s inevitable degeneration. The leaves have to turn yellow and eventually fall. And decay. The poet tells her that she has no choice but accept certain inevitabilities of life. Sorrow is our legacy, Margaret , I said to Margaret’s alter ego in my class. Let

Octlantis

I was reading an essay on octopuses when friend John walked in. When he is bored of his usual activities – babysitting and gardening – he would come over. Politics was the favourite concern of our conversations. We discussed politics so earnestly that any observer might think that we were running the world through the politicians quite like the gods running it through their devotees. “Octopuses are quite queer creatures,” I said. The essay I was reading had got all my attention. Moreover, I was getting bored of politics which is irredeemable anyway. “They have too many brains and a lot of hearts.” “That’s queer indeed,” John agreed. “Each arm has a mind of its own. Two-thirds of an octopus’s neurons are found in their arms. The arms can taste, touch, feel and act on their own without any input from the brain.” “They are quite like our politicians,” John observed. Everything is linked to politics in John’s mind. I was impressed with his analogy, however. “Perhaps, you’re r