Skip to main content

Who created you?


“Who created you?” I was asked by the catechism teacher in the Sunday class of the parish church when I was a kid of 6 or 7 years old. Like any other Catholic contemporary of mine I answered as mechanically as an android of today: “God created me.”

That was the very first question of the catechism book in those days. All of us Catholic children had to memorise quite a few dozen such questions. It was followed by: “Why did God create you?” Android’s answer: “In order to know, love and serve God so that we will live with Him in the end.” It went on and on though I don’t remember any question beyond those two.

I was reminded of that “little catechism” (as the question-answer booklet was known) this afternoon when a colleague of mine – the young physics teacher who found a mention in this very space a few days ago – narrated his experience in grade 12 (17-year-olds, not kids).  

He was speaking about the Big Bang in the class in the context of nuclear fusion and fission. He told them how we all, everything in the universe from the tiny little grain of sand on the beach and the vast lot of water in the ocean to the trillionth galaxy out there, came from a small little point, tinier than a pinhead which was incredibly hot and dense. Some 13.8 billion years ago, this tiny point exploded like a bomb and the space began to expand.

Eventually the universe grew larger and less hot. Then particles like protons and neutrons were born which in turn led to nuclear fusion and the birth of atoms and elements, and so on. My colleague was teaching physics.

Having traced the ancestry of everything in the universe to one singularity, he wanted to make sure that he did drive the point home. So he asked his students that same old catechism question: “Who created you?”

One of the students answered instantly, “God.”

“All my efforts of more than an hour to make them grow up from the kids’ catechism class to the adult scientific temper were a dismal failure,” my colleague concluded with his characteristic retiring smile.

Why does religion enjoy such a vice-like hold on people? Just look at what is happening in India these days. From 2014, in fact. Too many Indians speak and behave like little kids who are fascinated by gods who look and behave like nursery rhyme heroes – gods with elephant’s trunk or ape’s face and tail or those who cheat on a battlefield and call that dharma!

Similar things are happening in many other countries too though their gods may look more anthropoid and even more banal.

Why don’t humans grow up from the soporific succour of their nursery rhymes? I think the answer lies in the concept of memes mooted by Richard Dawkins in his book The Selfish Gene. Memes are units of cultural ideas (beliefs, practices, symbols, etc) that are transmitted from one person to another through imitation, communication or other social processes. They are quite as inalienable from us as are our genes. Religious belief is a meme too: hard to mutate.

Once some Jewish religious scholars and rabbis gathered to discuss the miseries they had endured for centuries. “Yahweh hasn’t been fair to us,” they all concluded after the philosophical and theological discussions and debates. They all agreed that it was time to tell Yahweh this and demand greater justice, if not love, from Him. Just then the gong sounded for Ma’ariv, the evening prayer. “Let us pray,” the Rabbi said. And life continued as it always did. With the slavishly ritualistic prayers three times a day. And numerous other rituals.

That’s it. Amen.

 

 

Comments

  1. This is such a great blog,I attended the above mentioned physics class,and it was one of the best and memorable physics class I've ever attended . I was a theist. I believed in an existence but not in religion. But this class made me a scientismist. And I'm very glad now. I believe in physics and it is a great feeling when you just believe it. It just makes sense. My friends still believe in God and religion blindly. Now I've respect for all the scientismists out there. I am against all the stupid rituals and all...
    When I came home after school,I was explaining everything to my family. My father is proud of me and I'm trying to explain my little sister science, physics...
    I love physics
    I appreciate tomichan sir for his blog

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Parvana, for this contribution as well as appreciation.

      I'm glad you have started thinking seriously. Keep learning, keep thinking, and you'll arrive at your own truths and convictions. You may eventually move from scientism too, as far as I can see. Scientism has its limits and limitations. For one, it is reductionist; that is, it reduces everything into simple, measurable components and ignores a whole lot of reality such as emotions, insights and human quest for what's beyond the physical. Secondly, moral questions cannot be answered by scientism. Human subjectivity and depths of consciousness are sidelined. There are many such issues. As you grow up, you will realise that look for your own ways of arriving at Truth. Best wishes.

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    ...this, I'm sure you will be aware, is right up my philosophical street. I could (and have) written much on the matter. Here, I shall refrain and simply utter, "Yup!" YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know how a theme like this can capture your attention. I could have gone on too.

      Delete
  3. Of course, one must be careful with how one defines "God".

    ReplyDelete
  4. To me, it comes to chromosomes and genetics.
    God would be an easier answer.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...