Skip to main content

The Significance of Jesus


A Catholic priest-friend of mine sent me a copy of the special edition of the Time magazine. 

The entire issue is on Jesus. Apart from essays written by eminent writers, there are numerous photographs related to Jesus like the ones below. 

Most of the essays present Jesus as seen by his religious believers. The very first one, titled ‘Who Was Jesus?’, starts with a ‘discovery’ made in June 2024. During a routine digitisation at Humboldt University in Hamburg, researchers discovered a scrap of papyrus with 13 lines of Ancient Greek. They were able to identify some of the words: Jesus, crowing, branch, etc. It was the earliest physical copy of a narrative called the Infancy Gospel of Thomas. Jesus is 5 years old in this gospel. The child has just moulded 12 sparrows out of clay sitting by a river. His father, Joseph, finds him and scolds him for working on the Sabbath. Jesus then claps his hands and tells the sparrows to go away. “The sparrows took flight and went away chirping,” reads the gospel.

This is one of the many gospels that didn’t find its way to the New Testament of the Bible. The Time relies on the biblical gospels for many of its first essays. But a lot of additional material is brought in by the later essays in the issue.

Who was Jesus? Why did he die on the cross?

If we leave aside theology and religion, Jesus was a hero for many Jews of his time. The Jews were a highly persecuted lot in those days. The Roman Empire and its soldiers were never kind to this race of people. The Jews were made to pay all sorts of taxes. Even their own religious leaders exploited the people in their own selfish ways. N T Wright, New Testament scholar, Pauline theologian, and Anglican bishop, shows in his essay how Jesus fit the bill for a people who longed for multiple liberations.

The Jews in the Palestine of Jesus’ time longed for a Messiah. They were dead tired of both the emperor’s kingdom and the priests’ kingdom. They now wanted God’s kingdom to come. That is exactly what Jesus promised. He taught the yearning Jews that they could be liberated easily. You can be healed, restored, forgiven right here; there’s no need to go to Jerusalem for all that. The intermediacy of the priests isn’t needed either.

Wright goes on to argue that it wasn’t the conversion of the individual Jew from his petty sins that Jesus wanted. He wanted Israel to be a whole new nation: the light of the world, the salt of the earth, the peacemaker, the healer. Israel was destined to be a kingdom of saints. And Jesus was the one who would establish that. How? By sacrificing himself. 

Wright’s view is that Jesus’ death was a sacrifice in atonement for Israel’s failures. Jesus describes himself as the sacrificial goat many times in the gospels. Yes, he would die so that Israel would live a new life. And that new life of Israel would revolutionise the world itself eventually.

Jesus’ death did alter the world revolutionarily. An entirely new religion arose from his teachings, a religion of love and compassion. It is quite a different matter that this ‘revolutionary’ religion, which could have actually made the human world God’s own kingdom, went the way of the other religions eventually. But the Time’s glossy pages do not look at the dark history of Jesus’ legacy.

If Jesus returns to the earth once again, will his priests of today repeat just what the priests of his time did? Richard Jerome, one of the editors of the Time, says in his essay that the Jewish priests of Jesus’ time convened a high council to decide whether Jesus had become a threat to their authority. “If we allow him to go on like this, soon everyone will believe in him. Then the Roman army will come and destroy both our Temple and our nation,” concluded the high council of the Pharisees and the Sadducees. And Caiaphas the high priest passed the verdict: “It is better that one man should die for the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed.”

It is highly ironical that Jesus was killed by his own people, particularly the religious leaders. If he returns to the human world today, his fate will be quite the same.

Why did Jesus die? This question is the title of David van Biema’s essay which appealed much to me. I grappled with that question for quite a while as a young man and I lost my faith in religion altogether when I couldn’t get a satisfactory answer to it. David van Biema accepts the atonement theology of Bishop Wright [traced above] but goes beyond that. Life is pain. Jesus’ death on the cross and the subsequent place the cross played in the religions founded in his name inspire the believers to accept the pain called life with resignation. Even God embraced that pain!

My personal problem still remains. Couldn’t the omnipotent God find a better way to deal with the pain called life? Well, that question remains and that’s why I am not a believer even now. Jesus, for me, was a great spiritual teacher. Like the Buddha and others. I admire them. But I’d rather embrace ways of alleviating life’s pains than embrace pain itself. 

Note: All the images above are copied from the Time.

PS. Thanks to Rev Jose Maliekal for his gift of the Time which made me take yet another look at Jesus and his teachings.

 

Comments

  1. It sounds like this issue really spoke to you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It did. I found the essays very stimulating, quite unlike religious writings.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for the very lucid and autobiographically tinged Synthesis of the Time's Jesus. My first and very refreshing read in the morning. May the search into the Enigma that is Jesus, move on...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That search will go on, no doubt, since Jesus remains deeply engraved somewhere deep within me.

      Delete
  3. Hari Om
    Thank you for sharing this with us. Exegetical and spiritual debate (indeed, historical and mythlogical) are all so intellectually stimulating. I can quite understand how this has grabbed your attention! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tomichen,
    the fact that a magazine like Time has brought out a special edition on Jesus speaks volumes on the relevance of Jesus and his teachings even 2000 years after his death. Believing or non believing him are once own choice.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Dharma and Destiny

  Illustration by Copilot Designer Unwavering adherence to dharma causes much suffering in the Ramayana . Dharma can mean duty, righteousness, and moral order. There are many characters in the Ramayana who stick to their dharma as best as they can and cause much pain to themselves as well as others. Dasharatha sees it as his duty as a ruler (raja-dharma) to uphold truth and justice and hence has to fulfil the promise he made to Kaikeyi and send Rama into exile in spite of the anguish it causes him and many others. Rama accepts the order following his dharma as an obedient son. Sita follows her dharma as a wife and enters the forest along with her husband. The brotherly dharma of Lakshmana makes him leave his own wife and escort Rama and Sita. It’s all not that simple, however. Which dharma makes Rama suspect Sita’s purity, later in Lanka? Which dharma makes him succumb to a societal expectation instead of upholding his personal integrity, still later in Ayodhya? “You were car...