Skip to main content

Insecure Leaders

Yakshi in Pinterest


In his book The God Delusion, Richard Dawkins argues that nationalism, religious bigotry, and other forms of zealotry are often the result of insecurity, a lack of self-confidence, or a deep-seated fear of insignificance. Quite many of today’s world leaders, who are all extremely and unwarrantedly belligerent, reminded me of Dawkins though I’m no fan of the man’s scientific extremism.

Dawkins is only one among many thinkers who expressed similar ideas, however. Eric Hoffer says in The True Believer that mass movements, including religious and nationalist ones, attract individuals who seek to escape their own personal failures or anxieties by identifying with a larger cause.

There are too many people suffering from personal insecurities in today’s world, it appears. There’s so much nationalism and even more unhealthy religious fervour. In India, both nationalism and religion have got mixed into a lethal concoction.

Many Indian newspapers of today have given prominent coverage to the “self-deportation” of Ranjani Srinivasan, an Indian student at Columbia University. She had shown her support to Palestine in a demonstration. Hence the Trump administration told her that it was a “privilege to be granted a visa to live and study in the USA. When you advocate for violence and terrorism, that privilege should be revoked, and you should not be in this country.”

Another Columbia University student, Leqaa Kordia, a Palestinian from West Bank, was arrested by US immigration officials for his role in leading campus protests against Israel.

Why do people like Trump fear protestors so much? Why do they feel so insecure?

Let me digress a little from the topic of psychological insecurities to ask a question: Why should anyone defend Israel anymore? Israel, founded by a people who were victimised by Nazism, has now become an inhuman victimiser. It has been perpetrating genocide in Palestine for quite some time now. Why is the liberal “gentile” West of Trump & Co defending a heartless settler-colonialist supremacist regime?

I’m reminded of an old Malayalam novel by Malayattoor Ramakrishnan [1927-1997]. Yakshi, the novel, was published in 1967 and was made into a movie by the same title the next year, and another movie in 2011 (Akam). In Kerala’s tradition, Yakshi is a female vampire who is driven by vindictiveness against men. What a Yakshi does usually is to seduce men in the middle of the night and then kill them brutally. Some Yakshis have passionate sex with the men before sucking their blood altogether.

In Malayattoor’s novel, however, the protagonist is transmuting an innocent, beautiful, young woman into a Yakshi because of his own insecurities. Srinivasan, the protagonist, is scarred badly on his face by an accident in the chemistry lab of the college where he is a lecturer. The scar gifts him too many insecurities. When his fiancée leaves him because of the scar, his psychological problems become more complex. Then, unexpectedly, a beautiful, young Ragini enters his life. She loves him. The scar is immaterial to her.

Srinivasan now realises that he has been rendered sexually impotent by his feelings of insecurity. In order to conceal his own acute insecurities, he projects Ragini as a Yakshi. Ragini has been cursed to live on earth by the Queen of Yakshidom, according to Srinivasan’s new narrative. She can acquire release from the curse only by draining Srinivasan’s blood. But she falls so deeply in love with Srinivasan that she is incapable of killing him. That is the narrative constructed by Srinivasan. In the end, Ragini becomes a tragic victim of Srinivasan’s falsehood and delusions.

Is the world today becoming a victim of the falsehood and delusions of a few individuals who claim to be world’s leaders but are actually men with fragile male egos? Aren’t many of the leaders driven by personal vulnerabilities rather than by any leadership qualities? Don’t their responses and reactions reveal basic internal fear, self-doubt, and paranoia?

Would a genuine leader resort to authoritarianism instead of standing up to genuine criticism? Why would a genuine leader resort to exaggerated displays of strength or hyper-nationalism? No good leader would ever require the constant support of sycophants. Manipulation of narratives, engaging in aggressive policies, and cracking down on dissent, all reveal too many chinks in the armour.

We, the ordinary people, deserve much better leaders than the ones we have, ones who transmute innocent and loving Raginis into their Yakshis. 

Yakshi as imagined by ChatGPT

x

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Yes, and both seem to be experiencing a snowball effect.

      Delete
  2. Hari Om
    The irony of Dawkins is that his 'scientific mind' is as fundamentalist as any he rails against! As a slight aside, one of the most interesting disussions I have ever listened to was between RD and Satish Kumar">... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm with you totally on this scientific fundamentalism of Dawkins. I'd have been a fan of his had he given enough room in his vision for the unscientific eccentricity of people like me.

      Thanks for the link. I wasn't aware of SK...

      Delete
    2. Thank you, Yamini, for sharing this link.

      Delete
  3. A thought-provoking post. The Yakshi analogy is quite striking. We see insecurity all around, not just in politics. It's closely allied to fear. And both together can create havoc. When our leaders are insecure, the extent of the damage is quite widespread.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The most insecure people ascend the highest thrones!

      Delete
  4. I can answer the question of why they're supporting Israel. In their branch of evangelical Christianity, Israel has to exist for the end of times to happen. For the 2nd coming. For rapture. Which is not a good reason, frankly, but they'll hold on to their beliefs (and their belief that we're in the end times), and they'll continue to support Israel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah, religion again! Dawkins' scientific fundamentalism is preferable.

      Delete
  5. Agree. Foor for thought.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Grandeur of the dooms

John Keats by William Hilton [Wikipedia] One of the poems included in CBSE’s class 12 English literature is an extract from Keats’ Endymion . A question that has come to me again and again from students as well as teachers is: What does “the grandeur of the dooms…” mean? It is a line that has perplexed me too. I have been amused by the kind of interpretations given in the guidebooks for students. Quite many of these books interpret the word ‘dooms’ to mean the Doomsday. Look at the following answer given in one such guidebook made available online by a well-known educational establishment.  That is very amusing considering the fact that Keats was an agnostic, if not a confirmed atheist. Keats would never accept a God who would come riding a majestic cloud on the day of the Last Judgment to apportion the good and the evil souls to Heaven and Hell. Evil is an integral part of life, Keats knew too well. No human can avoid evil any more than “a rose can avoid a blighting wind.” How...

Anyone for a better world?

The above video was sent to me on WhatsApp by a friend who also asked me to write a blog post on the injustices of capitalism. The friend quoted Lenin: “Capitalism is going to give us the rope with which we are going to hang them.” I wasn’t particularly enthused by the message or the demand for a blog post because I am like Benjamin the donkey in Orwell’s Animal Farm . Benjamin is cynical when it comes to politics. He knows that no party or ideology is going to make any substantial difference as far as the common folk are concerned. What can be an alternative to capitalism, for instance? Socialism/Communism? Benign dictatorship? Theocracy? The video above shows the absolute heartlessness of capitalism. But has socialism/communism been any better in the erstwhile USSR, China, and present North Korea, Venezuela, and Cuba? Dictatorship and theocracy are not economic systems, but have they saved any nation from injustices? I believe the problem is not with systems or ideologies . T...

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Innards of Spirituality

When a huge concrete cross was being shattered with a demolition hammer, I laughed rather raucously. I was watching the breakfast news on TV as usual. Most of the time, breakfast news is depressing with news about drug addicts, rapists, murderers, and politicians. This video of a cross being brought down in a very unceremonious ritual officiated by revenue mandarins was unique in a country of people whose religious sentiments are more brittle than dry leaves in an Indian summer. Maggie was not amused at all by my laughter because she misunderstood that I was laughing at a religious leaf being crushed with a political hammer. “This is the same cross in front of which our X (I named a very close relative of ours) fell prostrate a couple of months back during their picnic to Parumthumpara,” I explained. “She is a very spiritual person and so she respected the cross, that’s all.” Maggie’s spirituality is more like a leaf in a storm: I am the satanic storm and she is the tenacious ...