Skip to main content

War is Stupid: Pope Francis

Image by Google Gemini


I am reading Pope Franci’s autobiography, Hope. Some of his views on war and justice as expressed in the first pages [I’ve read only two chapters so far] accentuate the difference of this Pope from his predecessors. Many of his views are radical. I knew that Pope Francis was different from the other Popes, but hadn’t expected so much.

The title of chapter 2 is taken from Psalm 120: Too Long Do Live Among Those Who Hate Peace. The psalm was sung by Jewish pilgrims travelling to Jerusalem for religious festivals. It expresses a longing for deliverance from deceitful and hostile enemies. It is a prayer for divine justice. Justice is what Pope Francis seeks in the contemporary world too in chapter 2 of his autobiography.

“Each day the world seems more elitist,” he writes, “and each day crueler, toward those who have been cast out and abandoned. Developing countries continue to be drained of their finest natural and human resources for the benefit of a few privileged markets.” The Vatican was seldom known for its love for the underdogs.

The Pope goes on to advocate genuine development which “is inclusive, fruitful, directed toward the future and future generations.” He laments the present system which promotes false monopolistic development which “makes the rich richer and the poor poorer.” The poor are even blamed for their poverty by the rich.

Pope Francis hailed from a family that wasn’t rich. His grandparents, along with their young son (who would later be the Pope’s father) migrated from Italy to Argentina in order to escape the fascist regime of Mussolini. They were also familiar with the disasters that war brought, especially since the Pope’s father was an infantryman during the World War I.

“War is stupid,” Pope Francis writes. I can’t imagine any other Holy Father writing that so bluntly. It’s not people who are stupid, he asserts quoting Albert Einstein who thought that war would have been wiped out long ago “had not the common sense of nations been systematically corrupted […] for business and political reasons.” Yes, the multibillionaire-capitalists and their political systems have made the world what it is today. Even the Pope thinks so.

The Pope visited a War Memorial and a World War I cemetery in 2014. Looking at the thousands of tombs that carried the mortal remains of young soldiers, the Pope wept. “War is folly!” He writes in his autobiography. There is nothing called a just war. He quotes the example of Don Lorenzo Milani, a Catholic priest and a revolutionary educator, who made his students search in a hundred years of Italy’s history to find a ‘just’ war.

Wars are really not for the nation, the Pope writes, continuing to quote Don Milani. “… armies march upon the orders of the ruling class.”

Who wants a war? One Hitler, one Mussolini, one Napoleon… one Putin, one Trump – look at how this last guy treated Zelensky yesterday. Showing that video, my favourite breakfast news channel raised a question: Are we on the way to World War III?

Let us build bridges, the Pope concludes chapter 2. “Ony those who build bridges can move forward. The builders of walls end up imprisoned by the walls they themselves have built. Most of all, their hearts have become entrapped.”

 

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    My prayers are up for His Holiness, that his poor health is eased. Would that the light of his HOPE shone like the sun... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. His age stands against him, it seems. Let his light shine on.

      Delete
  2. War is stupid. Agreed. Only people who won't be personally touched by war seek to profit by it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. That's pronounced explicitly in the Pope's book too.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...