Skip to main content

Jatayu: The Winged Warrior

Image by Gemini AI


Jatayu is a vulture in Valmiki Ramayana. The choice of a vulture for a very noble mission on behalf of Rama is powerful poetic and moral decision. Vultures are scavengers, associated with death and decay. Yet Valmiki assigns to it one of the noblest tasks of sacrificing itself in defence of Sita. Your true worth lies in what you do, in your character, and not in your caste or even species. [In some versions, Jatayu is an eagle.]

Jatayu is given a noble funeral after his death. Rama treats Jatayu like a noble kshatriya who sacrificed his life fighting for dharma against an evil force like Ravana. “You are blessed, O Jatayu!” Rama tells the dying bird. “Even in your last moments, you upheld dharma. You fought to save a woman in distress. Your sacrifice will not go in vain.”

Jatayu sacrificed himself to save Sita from Ravana. He flew up into the clouds to stop Ravana’s flight with Sita. Jatayu was a friend of Dasharatha, Rama’s father. Now Rama calls him equal to his father: “Pitrusamah mama.” Rama calls him his kin, his elder brother, and a martyr for dharma.

When Jatayu is dead, Rama personally performs his cremation, saying: “Let your soul rise to the highest realms, O noble one. You are free of this world, and you have earned a place among the righteous.” Later, in the Mahabharata, Yudhishthira says, “Birth does not determine a person’s caste; it is by actions (karma) that one’s true status is known.” Jatayu may be a bird of an inferior category; but by karma he has achieved nobility.

Jatayu’s fight with Ravana takes place in the sky. His wings are cut off by Ravana and he plummets to the earth. He clings on to life painfully for Rama’s arrival just to tell him where to look for Sita. He breathes his last lying in the lap of Rama, a divine incarnation, with a sense of fulfilment. His mission is accomplished; his life has acquired a new dimension. He is no more a mean vulture.

On the other hand, Ravana is Brahmin by birth. Learned and powerful too. Jatayu is not even fit to be anywhere near the Varna system by birth. But his karma makes him far nobler than the Brahmin Ravana. Your actions determine whether you are really a Brahmin or a rakshasa.

You can be a royal Kshatriya like Kaikeyi, but by karma be nothing more than an ignoble manipulator driven by fear, ambition, and egotism. Unlike Ravana, however, Kaikeyi redeems herself later.

Jatayu might have said: Janma na jayate shreshtah, karma hi paramam phalam: It is not by birth that one becomes noble; it is by righteous action.

Characters such as Jatayu and Hanuman make me wonder whether Valmiki was subverting the caste system of the time. 


PS. I’m participating in #BlogchatterA2Z. This series looks at the Ramayana from various angles.

Tomorrow: Karma versus Fatalism

Previous Posts in this series:

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Chitrakoot: The Antithesis of Ayodhya

Dharma and Destiny

Exile and the Kingdom

Friendship in Kishkindha

Golden Deer: Illusions

Hanuman: Zenith of Devotion

Ikshvaku: Mythos versus Logos

Comments

  1. Loved the story and your insightful thoughts on Jatayu👍

    ReplyDelete
  2. Absolutely! It is by a person's deeds their caliber as human beings is determined! Not by any system of caste or creed. And possibly Valmiki was trying to disrupt th

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is indeed very true that it is by their deeds a person's caliber is determined. Not by some imagined caste system. Fight for what is right in the face of impossible odds. And as you say Valmiki might have been trying to disrupt the prevalent Varna system of those days

      Delete
    2. Both these comments - the anonymous one and my friend Jai's - remind me of O V Vijayan, renowned Malayalam novelist. In 'Generations' (novel),Vijayan explored the worth of Brahminhood by making a low caste person learn Sanskrit and scriptures and do whatever a Brahmin could do. The Ezhava character became a Brahmin by knowledge. But he remained discontented. He learnt that it is not Brahminhood that makes life worthwhile. It is one's qualities.

      Delete
  3. Such a beautiful post, almost an ode to the brave Jatayu! Mayuri

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hari OM
    Oh yes, dear Jatayu... I can never read this (or watch it played) without a tear. One of my favourite characters. For all the brief time he is in the tale, we come to love the mighty bird for his deeds and the lesson of actions speaking loudest. YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Jatayu was a friend of Dasharatha, Rama’s father. Now Rama calls him equal to his father: “Pitrusamah mama.” I didn't know this fact. The way you gave this beautiful ode to Jatayu, it's incredible. May more people know about Jatayu and his great sacrifices. - Swarnali Nath

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Our epics have characters that move across time. Some of the characters from Ramayana appear in Mahabharata too.

      Delete
  6. Those on top have a vested interest in staying on top, no matter how ignoble they are. Birth does not determine worth, yet most cultures have some version of holding onto the opposite.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I wish people gave more emphasis on one's Karma rather than the caste system or religion divisions . The world would be a much better place. Once again, your reflective post about Jatayu makes us think as to what exactly keeps us away from striving to do better deeds. The usage of the Sanskrit verse adds more depth to it. Kudos to you, Sir for making the effort to learn a new language!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are a lot of words common to Sanskrit and Malayalam. So it's not all that hard for a Malayali to learn Sanskrit.

      Delete
  8. That's interesting. I haven't thought about that. It seems like Jatayu achieved moksha. Elders say even uttering Rama on deathbed gives you Moksha, the Jatayu migth have been fortunate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good Karma gives one the final deliverance. So, of course, Jatayu must have got his moksha.

      Delete
  9. Jatayu is a character who captures the interest of everyone, including children. Such expressions of love are found throughout our literature. You mentioned Hanuman already—there’s also Guha’s devotion to Rama, Kannappan’s to Shiva, Meera's to Krishna, and Andal’s to Rangamannar. Please keep up your wonderful writing, Sir. All the best!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, friend, for accompanying me on this epic journey.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Sex and Sin

Disclaimer: This is not a book review The first discovery made by Adam and Eve after they disobeyed God was sex. Sex is sin in Christianity except when the union takes place with the sole intention of procreation like a farmer sowing the seed. Saint Augustine said, Adam and Eve would have procreated by a calm, rational act of the will if they had continued to live in the Garden of Eden. The Catholic Church wants sex to be a rational act for it not to be a sin. The body and its passions are evil. The soul is holy and belongs to God. One of the most poignant novels I’ve read about the body-soul conflict in Catholicism is Sarah Joseph’s Othappu . Originally written in Malayalam, it was translated into English with the same Malayalam title. The word ‘othappu’ doesn’t have an exact equivalent in English. Approximately, it means ‘scandal’ as in the Biblical verse: “ If anyone causes one of these little ones to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around t...