Skip to main content

The X Factor of the Ramayana

Illustration by Gemini AI


We need myths to understand the reality of people. “Art is a lie that makes us realise truth,” Pablo Picasso said famously. Every myth is an art. That is, myth is not truth, but it helps us understand truths. Because ‘the people’ is a mythical category, though historical as well.

People are a mythical category because they represent a living community with a soul, a shared memory, and a common destiny – something deeper than what one can measure or pin down. People form an entity that is much bigger than what logic and reason can explain, with its many complex dimensions like belonging, hope, tradition, and dreams. No one can reduce any people to mere jingoistic slogans and narrowminded concepts like nationalism. There is a mystery that buoys up well above slogans and jingles.

People constantly create relationships beyond themselves. There is something about them “that doesn’t love a wall,” if I may borrow an image from poet Robert Frost. It is not exclusion and strife that people want, but communities of belonging and solidarity. Populist leaders exploit people’s culture for their own advantage, as   Pope Francis wrote in one of his exhortations.

India’s great epics can offer sparkling pointers toward better understanding of the people.  

The X factor of the Ramayana is precisely that it is an effective tool in our quest to understand ourselves. It has everything in it, quite as Vyasa said about his epic: “Whatever is here is found elsewhere; what is not here is nowhere else.” All our virtues and vices, our inner angels and demons, are there in the Ramayana in identifiable shapes.

Rama’s anguish, Sita’s resilience, Lakshmana’s loyalty, Hanuman’s devotion, all are our own characteristics. Love, duty, loss, longing, betrayal, honour, sacrifice, and redemption – that’s what the Ramayana is about and that’s what our life is about too.

The Ramayana presents ideals: the ideal man, woman, brother, and devotee. At the same time, it does not shy away from showing how painful and complex it is to live up to ideals. Rama’s choices are not easy even though he is an incarnation of God. Sita’s trials are heart-wrenching. This tension between dharma and desire, between personal happiness and cosmic duty, is universal and timeless.

The scale of the narrative in the Ramayana is enormous with all those gods, demons, flying chariots, and cosmic battles. At the same time, it is an intimate world of a loving wife accompanying her exiled husband into a dreadful forest. There is a brother who escorts the exile with equal love. Another brother who shuns the royal throne out of love again. So much love. Yet what lies at the core of the narrative is a dreadful war. Conflict can make love stronger. It helps to bring people closer together in supportive hugs. But in this narrative the conflict leads to other complex conflicts. What stands as supreme: love or dharma? What is dharma without love? What value does that have?

The characters in this epic narrative thus become symbols rather than just story elements. Rama becomes the embodiment of dharma, Sita of inner strength and purity, Ravana of ego and unchecked desire, Hanuman of faith and surrender. Thus the narrative acquires a spiritual and philosophical depth.

In the Ramayana, the people – janata or praja – are never just background figures like the pawns on a chessboard. The pawns only appear to be in the forefront. Unlike them, the people of Rama Rajya were a living force, a kind of moral conscience that shaped and reflected the destiny of Rama and the kingdom of Ayodhya.

Finally, the Ramayana teaches that true leadership means entering into the mystery that ‘people’ essentially is with humility and compassion. 

PS. This post has been highly influenced by the autobiography of Pope Francis and is part of an A-Z series which is approaching its climax.

Tomorrow: Yes to Life

Previous Posts in this series:

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

  1. This is a fantastic take on Ramayana!

    ReplyDelete
  2. People are a Living Force, with their Agency - the power of determination and destiny. And myths hold a mirror to ourselves and help us weigh our truths to ourselves. Pope Francis,dead or Alive, will continue to challenge us and our consciences and that is his Geopolitical Imact - The Francis Impact, as Jayati Gosh, a respected economist, remarked to KaranThapar in the Recent Wire Interview. Now, back to my Intellectual Property Rights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In fact, I wish to write more posts based on my reading of Hope.

      Delete
  3. Hari OM
    Xlnt!!! I was awaiting your take on this letter of the alphabet, Xpecting the Xile but finding so much more! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is all about self-discovery, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting take as usual! Learning a new aspect in relation to today’s prespective

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Today's politics is precisely what drove me to study Ramayana in such detail.

      Delete
  6. In fact, that tension between love and dharma remains as an unresolved dilemma in my mind.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ramayana always feels like the story of every other household & yet has this aura of grandness to it. And yes, a leader without humility & compassion is no leader.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The epic is grand in its vision and exposition. There's much that can be learnt if only readers want to learn.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Sex and Sin

Disclaimer: This is not a book review The first discovery made by Adam and Eve after they disobeyed God was sex. Sex is sin in Christianity except when the union takes place with the sole intention of procreation like a farmer sowing the seed. Saint Augustine said, Adam and Eve would have procreated by a calm, rational act of the will if they had continued to live in the Garden of Eden. The Catholic Church wants sex to be a rational act for it not to be a sin. The body and its passions are evil. The soul is holy and belongs to God. One of the most poignant novels I’ve read about the body-soul conflict in Catholicism is Sarah Joseph’s Othappu . Originally written in Malayalam, it was translated into English with the same Malayalam title. The word ‘othappu’ doesn’t have an exact equivalent in English. Approximately, it means ‘scandal’ as in the Biblical verse: “ If anyone causes one of these little ones to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around t...