Skip to main content

The X Factor of the Ramayana

Illustration by Gemini AI


We need myths to understand the reality of people. “Art is a lie that makes us realise truth,” Pablo Picasso said famously. Every myth is an art. That is, myth is not truth, but it helps us understand truths. Because ‘the people’ is a mythical category, though historical as well.

People are a mythical category because they represent a living community with a soul, a shared memory, and a common destiny – something deeper than what one can measure or pin down. People form an entity that is much bigger than what logic and reason can explain, with its many complex dimensions like belonging, hope, tradition, and dreams. No one can reduce any people to mere jingoistic slogans and narrowminded concepts like nationalism. There is a mystery that buoys up well above slogans and jingles.

People constantly create relationships beyond themselves. There is something about them “that doesn’t love a wall,” if I may borrow an image from poet Robert Frost. It is not exclusion and strife that people want, but communities of belonging and solidarity. Populist leaders exploit people’s culture for their own advantage, as   Pope Francis wrote in one of his exhortations.

India’s great epics can offer sparkling pointers toward better understanding of the people.  

The X factor of the Ramayana is precisely that it is an effective tool in our quest to understand ourselves. It has everything in it, quite as Vyasa said about his epic: “Whatever is here is found elsewhere; what is not here is nowhere else.” All our virtues and vices, our inner angels and demons, are there in the Ramayana in identifiable shapes.

Rama’s anguish, Sita’s resilience, Lakshmana’s loyalty, Hanuman’s devotion, all are our own characteristics. Love, duty, loss, longing, betrayal, honour, sacrifice, and redemption – that’s what the Ramayana is about and that’s what our life is about too.

The Ramayana presents ideals: the ideal man, woman, brother, and devotee. At the same time, it does not shy away from showing how painful and complex it is to live up to ideals. Rama’s choices are not easy even though he is an incarnation of God. Sita’s trials are heart-wrenching. This tension between dharma and desire, between personal happiness and cosmic duty, is universal and timeless.

The scale of the narrative in the Ramayana is enormous with all those gods, demons, flying chariots, and cosmic battles. At the same time, it is an intimate world of a loving wife accompanying her exiled husband into a dreadful forest. There is a brother who escorts the exile with equal love. Another brother who shuns the royal throne out of love again. So much love. Yet what lies at the core of the narrative is a dreadful war. Conflict can make love stronger. It helps to bring people closer together in supportive hugs. But in this narrative the conflict leads to other complex conflicts. What stands as supreme: love or dharma? What is dharma without love? What value does that have?

The characters in this epic narrative thus become symbols rather than just story elements. Rama becomes the embodiment of dharma, Sita of inner strength and purity, Ravana of ego and unchecked desire, Hanuman of faith and surrender. Thus the narrative acquires a spiritual and philosophical depth.

In the Ramayana, the people – janata or praja – are never just background figures like the pawns on a chessboard. The pawns only appear to be in the forefront. Unlike them, the people of Rama Rajya were a living force, a kind of moral conscience that shaped and reflected the destiny of Rama and the kingdom of Ayodhya.

Finally, the Ramayana teaches that true leadership means entering into the mystery that ‘people’ essentially is with humility and compassion. 

PS. This post has been highly influenced by the autobiography of Pope Francis and is part of an A-Z series which is approaching its climax.

Tomorrow: Yes to Life

Previous Posts in this series:

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

  1. This is a fantastic take on Ramayana!

    ReplyDelete
  2. People are a Living Force, with their Agency - the power of determination and destiny. And myths hold a mirror to ourselves and help us weigh our truths to ourselves. Pope Francis,dead or Alive, will continue to challenge us and our consciences and that is his Geopolitical Imact - The Francis Impact, as Jayati Gosh, a respected economist, remarked to KaranThapar in the Recent Wire Interview. Now, back to my Intellectual Property Rights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In fact, I wish to write more posts based on my reading of Hope.

      Delete
  3. Hari OM
    Xlnt!!! I was awaiting your take on this letter of the alphabet, Xpecting the Xile but finding so much more! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is all about self-discovery, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting take as usual! Learning a new aspect in relation to today’s prespective

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Today's politics is precisely what drove me to study Ramayana in such detail.

      Delete
  6. In fact, that tension between love and dharma remains as an unresolved dilemma in my mind.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ramayana always feels like the story of every other household & yet has this aura of grandness to it. And yes, a leader without humility & compassion is no leader.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The epic is grand in its vision and exposition. There's much that can be learnt if only readers want to learn.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Bihar Election

Satish Acharya's Cartoon on how votes were bought in Bihar My wife has been stripped of her voting rights in the revised electoral roll. She has always been a conscientious voter unlike me. I refused to vote in the last Lok Sabha election though I stood outside the polling booth for Maggie to perform what she claimed was her duty as a citizen. The irony now is that she, the dutiful citizen, has been stripped of the right, while I, the ostensible renegade gets the right that I don’t care for. Since the Booth Level Officer [BLO] was my neighbour, he went out of his way to ring up some higher officer, sitting in my house, to enquire about Maggie’s exclusion. As a result, I was given the assurance that he, the BLO, would do whatever was in his power to get my wife her voting right. More than the voting right, what really bothered me was whether the Modi government was going to strip my wife of her Indian citizenship. Anything is possible in Modi’s India: Modi hai to Mumkin hai .   ...

Nehru’s Secularism

Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, and Narendra Modi, the present one, are diametrically opposite to each other. Take any parameter, from boorishness to sophistication or religious views, and these two men would remain poles apart. Is it Nehru’s towering presence in history that intimidates Modi into hurling ceaseless allegations against him? Today, 14 Nov, is Nehru’s birth anniversary and Modi’s tweet was uncharacteristically terse. It said, “Tributes to former Prime Minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Ji on the occasion of his birth anniversary.” Somebody posted a trenchant cartoon in the comments section.  Nehru had his flaws, no doubt. He was as human as Modi. But what made him a giant while Modi remains a dwarf – as in the cartoon above – is the way they viewed human beings. For Nehru, all human beings mattered, irrespective of their caste, creed, language, etc. His concept of secularism stands a billion notches above Modi’s Hindutva-nationalism. Nehru’s ide...

The Art of Subjugation: A Case Study

Two Pulaya women, 1926 [Courtesy Mathrubhumi ] The Pulaya and Paraya communities were the original landowners in Kerala until the Brahmins arrived from the North with their religion and gods. They did not own the land individually; the lands belonged to the tribes. Then in the 8 th – 10 th centuries CE, the Brahmins known as Namboothiris in Kerala arrived and deceived the Pulayas and Parayas lock, stock, and barrel. With the help of religion. The Namboothiris proclaimed themselves the custodians of all wealth by divine mandate. They possessed the Vedic and Sanskrit mantras and tantras to prove their claims. The aboriginal people of Kerala couldn’t make head or tail of concepts such as Brahmadeya (land donated to Brahmins becoming sacred land) or Manu’s injunctions such as: “Land given to a Brahmin should never be taken back” [8.410] or “A king who confiscates land from Brahmins incurs sin” [8.394]. The Brahmins came, claimed certain powers given by the gods, and started exploi...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...