Skip to main content

Mandodari: An Unsung Heroine

Mandodari and Ravana by Gemini AI


To remain virtuous in a palace darkened by the ego of the king is a hard thing to do, especially if one is the queen there. Mandodari remained not only virtuous till the end of her life in that palace, but also wise and graceful. That’s what makes her a heroine, though an unsung one. Her battlefield was an inner one: a moral war that she had to wage constantly while being a wife of an individual who was driven by ego and lust.

Probably her only fault was that she was the queen-wife of Ravana. Inside the golden towers of Ravana’s palace, pride reigned and adharma festered. Mandodari must have had tremendous inner goodness to be able to withstand the temptations offered by the opulence, arrogance, and desires that overflowed from the palace. She refused to be corrupted in spite of being the wife of an egotistic demon-king.

Mandodari was born of Mayasura and Hema, an asura and an apsara, a demon and a nymph. She inherited the beauty and grace of her mother. Her, father despite being a demon, was a good person: one of the characters in the epic that challenges the usual binary of good and evil.

She counsels Ravana against incurring Rama’s wrath. She tries her best to avoid the war. In the end, when Ravana is killed as his destiny unfolded in obedience to the cosmic vision in the epic, Mandodari accepts the tragedy with grace and resilience.

There are certain South Indian folk Ramayanas in which Mandodari questions Rama and the moral order of his divine cosmos. In these versions, Mandodari doesn’t accept the law of karma. She emerges as a philosopher of the absurd, as I wrote in an earlier post (Dharma and Destiny). Things happen randomly. There is no spiritual power controlling anything. Bad things happen to good people and vice-versa. All the neat patterns that are said to be there in the human moral world are our own impositions.

She appreciates the fact that her husband had his share of goodness: courage and knowledge. He loved her too. “I never asked why I was lucky to be his wife,” Mandodari tells Rama. “So now I have no right to ask why I have been widowed. Time throws its dice. We do not know how it will roll. Whatever it is, I accept with grace.”

That grace is what makes Mandodari a heroine. In addition to that, she was voice of reason in a world of ego.

I find myself comparing her with Sita. Both are women caught in situations shaped by male choices. And both uphold dharma in their own ways and with grace and dignity.

Let Mandodari enter the conscience of arrogant political power, I pray. Let her speak up in places where hubris silences or even incarcerates wisdom. 


PS. I’m participating in #BlogchatterA2Z. This series looks at the Ramayana from various angles.

Tomorrow: Nala, Nila, and Ram Setu

Previous Posts in this series:

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Chitrakoot: The Antithesis of Ayodhya

Dharma and Destiny

Exile and the Kingdom

Friendship in Kishkindha

Golden Deer: Illusions

Hanuman: Zenith of Devotion

Ikshvaku: Mythos versus Logos

Jatayu: The Winged Warrior

Karma versus Fatalism

Loyalty: The Silent Strength of Ramayana 

Comments

  1. Reading the post on Mandodari truly opened my eyes to her often-overlooked role in the Ramayana. I had always known her as Ravana's wife, but this piece highlighted her wisdom, strength, and moral compass. It's fascinating how she stood by her principles, even when surrounded by chaos and power struggles. The author's portrayal made me reflect on the silent resilience many women exhibit, often without recognition. Mandodari's attempts to counsel Ravana, urging him towards righteousness, showcase her courage and integrity. It's a reminder that true strength isn't always loud; sometimes, it's in the quiet persistence of doing what's right. This post has inspired me to delve deeper into the stories of such unsung heroines in our epics. They offer rich lessons in character and virtue that are still relevant today. I'm grateful for this fresh perspective on a character I had previously overlooked. It emphasizes the importance of revisiting and reinterpreting our mythological narratives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The more I study the epic, the more interesting do I find the minor characters like Mandodari and Jatayu. When I come to the letter Q in this series, The Quest for Sita will explore the feminine in the epic deeper. Do be with me.

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    Hear! Hear! to your closing plea. Accepting the flow of things, while still having the courage to speak truth to power is the example of Mandodari. Something that we indeed require much more of again... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a lot of Mandodari in my own nature, you see.

      Delete
  3. Grace and resilience are the assets of only wise people/ women like Sita and Mandodhari. They are aware that everything passes - fortune or tragedy. Wise people remain poised in both circumstances. They are truly resilient, a quality ordinary humans lack and always suffer. Beautiful insights presented in this blog. Very good analysis of characters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad you're taking time off to read me these days. You will definitely find some of the forthcoming posts even more striking, I promise.

      Delete
  4. Great Piece on Mandodari. Celebrating her circumspection and her Quantum approach to ethics, including that of herself and her husband. Yes. Both Mahabharata and Ramayana, approach reality, kaleidoscopically, beyond the binaries. Hope you have taken note of the character of Ravana, in the film, Ravana. Not lustful, towards Sita, but respectful. In the Epics, like for Iraneus, evil is a by-product of the zigzag growth of humanity, from infancy to adulthood.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ravana had his share of greatness, no doubt. Valmiki didn't write the Ramayana as a story of victory of good over evil. These extrapolations came later, as you know I'm sure.

      Delete
  5. I have always admired Mandodari. I think when they say that you need darkness to shine brighter is actually applicable in this case. Following the right path, be it Mandodari or Sita or us in general ( in today's world too) has always been tough !

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mandodari was perhaps placed next to Ravan to show how even in the face of goodness and reason, evil can still choose pride and destruction over wisdom and righteousness. Mandodari, known for her wisdom and virtue, often counseled Ravan against his destructive path. Her presence highlights the tragedy of ignored counsel and the strength of a righteous woman amid chaos.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is where destiny becomes a problematic theme. Ravana was created/cursed to be evil. Did he have a choice at all?

      Delete
  7. I don't know, maybe he did. Because everyone kept telling him to ask for forgiveness, from vibhishan to kumbhkaran, from mandodari to sita, hanuman,angad and many others. Maybe it was a chance to change' his destiny

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's true. But what I'm saying is that one's hubris can be also one's destiny, particularly when one was meant to die the way it happened.

      Delete
    2. I agree. That's the paradox of Ravan. He is both villain and victim — a man of brilliance undone by his inability to master the self

      Delete
  8. A woman trapped in the evil her husband did? Too bad that's a familiar refrain.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And all too human especially in patriarchal societies. Indian patriarchy was very rigid too in the 'good ol' days. (Even now!)

      Delete
  9. I have an intrigue and interest to know more about Mandodari. Her character was overshadowed yet her silent presence was powerful in the epic. I enjoyed reading your post. - Swarnali Nath (The Blissful Storyteller)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I haven’t read much about her, just a few scattered references. This post offers one of the best insights I’ve come across.
    I liked your comparison between Mandotari and Seeta.

    Thank you, sir, for sharing yet another informative post.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Sex and Sin

Disclaimer: This is not a book review The first discovery made by Adam and Eve after they disobeyed God was sex. Sex is sin in Christianity except when the union takes place with the sole intention of procreation like a farmer sowing the seed. Saint Augustine said, Adam and Eve would have procreated by a calm, rational act of the will if they had continued to live in the Garden of Eden. The Catholic Church wants sex to be a rational act for it not to be a sin. The body and its passions are evil. The soul is holy and belongs to God. One of the most poignant novels I’ve read about the body-soul conflict in Catholicism is Sarah Joseph’s Othappu . Originally written in Malayalam, it was translated into English with the same Malayalam title. The word ‘othappu’ doesn’t have an exact equivalent in English. Approximately, it means ‘scandal’ as in the Biblical verse: “ If anyone causes one of these little ones to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around t...