Skip to main content

Mandodari: An Unsung Heroine

Mandodari and Ravana by Gemini AI


To remain virtuous in a palace darkened by the ego of the king is a hard thing to do, especially if one is the queen there. Mandodari remained not only virtuous till the end of her life in that palace, but also wise and graceful. That’s what makes her a heroine, though an unsung one. Her battlefield was an inner one: a moral war that she had to wage constantly while being a wife of an individual who was driven by ego and lust.

Probably her only fault was that she was the queen-wife of Ravana. Inside the golden towers of Ravana’s palace, pride reigned and adharma festered. Mandodari must have had tremendous inner goodness to be able to withstand the temptations offered by the opulence, arrogance, and desires that overflowed from the palace. She refused to be corrupted in spite of being the wife of an egotistic demon-king.

Mandodari was born of Mayasura and Hema, an asura and an apsara, a demon and a nymph. She inherited the beauty and grace of her mother. Her, father despite being a demon, was a good person: one of the characters in the epic that challenges the usual binary of good and evil.

She counsels Ravana against incurring Rama’s wrath. She tries her best to avoid the war. In the end, when Ravana is killed as his destiny unfolded in obedience to the cosmic vision in the epic, Mandodari accepts the tragedy with grace and resilience.

There are certain South Indian folk Ramayanas in which Mandodari questions Rama and the moral order of his divine cosmos. In these versions, Mandodari doesn’t accept the law of karma. She emerges as a philosopher of the absurd, as I wrote in an earlier post (Dharma and Destiny). Things happen randomly. There is no spiritual power controlling anything. Bad things happen to good people and vice-versa. All the neat patterns that are said to be there in the human moral world are our own impositions.

She appreciates the fact that her husband had his share of goodness: courage and knowledge. He loved her too. “I never asked why I was lucky to be his wife,” Mandodari tells Rama. “So now I have no right to ask why I have been widowed. Time throws its dice. We do not know how it will roll. Whatever it is, I accept with grace.”

That grace is what makes Mandodari a heroine. In addition to that, she was voice of reason in a world of ego.

I find myself comparing her with Sita. Both are women caught in situations shaped by male choices. And both uphold dharma in their own ways and with grace and dignity.

Let Mandodari enter the conscience of arrogant political power, I pray. Let her speak up in places where hubris silences or even incarcerates wisdom. 


PS. I’m participating in #BlogchatterA2Z. This series looks at the Ramayana from various angles.

Tomorrow: Nala, Nila, and Ram Setu

Previous Posts in this series:

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Chitrakoot: The Antithesis of Ayodhya

Dharma and Destiny

Exile and the Kingdom

Friendship in Kishkindha

Golden Deer: Illusions

Hanuman: Zenith of Devotion

Ikshvaku: Mythos versus Logos

Jatayu: The Winged Warrior

Karma versus Fatalism

Loyalty: The Silent Strength of Ramayana 

Comments

  1. Reading the post on Mandodari truly opened my eyes to her often-overlooked role in the Ramayana. I had always known her as Ravana's wife, but this piece highlighted her wisdom, strength, and moral compass. It's fascinating how she stood by her principles, even when surrounded by chaos and power struggles. The author's portrayal made me reflect on the silent resilience many women exhibit, often without recognition. Mandodari's attempts to counsel Ravana, urging him towards righteousness, showcase her courage and integrity. It's a reminder that true strength isn't always loud; sometimes, it's in the quiet persistence of doing what's right. This post has inspired me to delve deeper into the stories of such unsung heroines in our epics. They offer rich lessons in character and virtue that are still relevant today. I'm grateful for this fresh perspective on a character I had previously overlooked. It emphasizes the importance of revisiting and reinterpreting our mythological narratives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The more I study the epic, the more interesting do I find the minor characters like Mandodari and Jatayu. When I come to the letter Q in this series, The Quest for Sita will explore the feminine in the epic deeper. Do be with me.

      Delete
  2. Hari OM
    Hear! Hear! to your closing plea. Accepting the flow of things, while still having the courage to speak truth to power is the example of Mandodari. Something that we indeed require much more of again... YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a lot of Mandodari in my own nature, you see.

      Delete
  3. Grace and resilience are the assets of only wise people/ women like Sita and Mandodhari. They are aware that everything passes - fortune or tragedy. Wise people remain poised in both circumstances. They are truly resilient, a quality ordinary humans lack and always suffer. Beautiful insights presented in this blog. Very good analysis of characters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad you're taking time off to read me these days. You will definitely find some of the forthcoming posts even more striking, I promise.

      Delete
  4. Great Piece on Mandodari. Celebrating her circumspection and her Quantum approach to ethics, including that of herself and her husband. Yes. Both Mahabharata and Ramayana, approach reality, kaleidoscopically, beyond the binaries. Hope you have taken note of the character of Ravana, in the film, Ravana. Not lustful, towards Sita, but respectful. In the Epics, like for Iraneus, evil is a by-product of the zigzag growth of humanity, from infancy to adulthood.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ravana had his share of greatness, no doubt. Valmiki didn't write the Ramayana as a story of victory of good over evil. These extrapolations came later, as you know I'm sure.

      Delete
  5. I have always admired Mandodari. I think when they say that you need darkness to shine brighter is actually applicable in this case. Following the right path, be it Mandodari or Sita or us in general ( in today's world too) has always been tough !

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mandodari was perhaps placed next to Ravan to show how even in the face of goodness and reason, evil can still choose pride and destruction over wisdom and righteousness. Mandodari, known for her wisdom and virtue, often counseled Ravan against his destructive path. Her presence highlights the tragedy of ignored counsel and the strength of a righteous woman amid chaos.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is where destiny becomes a problematic theme. Ravana was created/cursed to be evil. Did he have a choice at all?

      Delete
  7. I don't know, maybe he did. Because everyone kept telling him to ask for forgiveness, from vibhishan to kumbhkaran, from mandodari to sita, hanuman,angad and many others. Maybe it was a chance to change' his destiny

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's true. But what I'm saying is that one's hubris can be also one's destiny, particularly when one was meant to die the way it happened.

      Delete
    2. I agree. That's the paradox of Ravan. He is both villain and victim — a man of brilliance undone by his inability to master the self

      Delete
  8. A woman trapped in the evil her husband did? Too bad that's a familiar refrain.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And all too human especially in patriarchal societies. Indian patriarchy was very rigid too in the 'good ol' days. (Even now!)

      Delete
  9. I have an intrigue and interest to know more about Mandodari. Her character was overshadowed yet her silent presence was powerful in the epic. I enjoyed reading your post. - Swarnali Nath (The Blissful Storyteller)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I haven’t read much about her, just a few scattered references. This post offers one of the best insights I’ve come across.
    I liked your comparison between Mandotari and Seeta.

    Thank you, sir, for sharing yet another informative post.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...