Skip to main content

Gandhi, his god and the ordinary mortals

Mahatma Gandhi was a radical thinker with an idealistic vision.  He strove utmost to put that vision into practice in his life.  He was no less than the Buddha or Jesus in his aspirations as well as materialisation of those aspirations.  Jesus was crucified by the religious people whose vested interests were at stake.  Gandhi was shot dead by a person who represented vested religious interests.
Gandhi was a Hindu in the sense he followed the religious practices of Hinduism.  But his religion surpassed the straitjackets of any organised religion.  He internalised religion to the highest degree possible for an ordinary human being.  He interpreted the Gita in his own unique way just as he did with the other scriptures.
According to Gandhi’s interpretation, the Mahabharata is not the history of an actual war.  “It [the Mahabharata] is not a history of war between two families,” wrote Gandhi, “but the history of man – the history of the spiritual struggle of man.”[1]  The Pandavas and the Kauravas become the forces of good and evil within every human being, according to Gandhi’s interpretation of the Mahabharata
Gandhi even doubted the historical reality of Krishna.  “I have no knowledge that the Krishna of Mahabharata ever lived.  My Krishna has nothing to do with any historical person,” wrote Gandhi. [2]  In the same article he goes to say, “I believe in Krishna of my imagination as a perfect incarnation, spotless in every sense of the word, the inspirer of the Gita.”  Further, he says that if the Mahabharata is indeed history and Krishna “actually did some of the acts attributed to him, even at the risk of being banished from the Hindu fold, I should not hesitate to reject that Krishna as God-incarnate.”
What Gandhi says about Krishna will become clearer when we understand his views on Rama.  “My Rama,” says Gandhi, “the Rama of my prayers is not the historical Rama, the son of Dasharatha, the King of Ayodhya.  He is the eternal, the unborn, the one without a second….” [3]
Rama is the concept of God that lies deep within Gandhi’s heart, a concept that is at once abstract and concrete.  It is abstract because it has no material form; it is concrete because it is the divinity present deep within every human being. 
In a 1942 article Gandhi wrote, “Rama is not known by only a thousand names.  His names are innumerable, and He is the same whether we call Him Allah, Khuda, Rahim, Razzak, the Bread-giver, or any name that comes from the heart of a true devotee.” [4]
What Gandhi called Rama, a Christian may call Jesus, a Muslim Allah or a Jew Yahweh.  All these gods are one and the same God, for Gandhi.  We call that God by different names because we have been taught those names in our childhood.  As we grow up it is our bounden duty to realise the oneness of that God, to realise the presence of that God in the deepest core of our heart.  Shorn of that realisation, religion will remain meaningless.  Worse, religion will remain a cause of strife and division among people.   
Religion has a very pragmatic duty to fulfil in Gandhi’s vision.  It should help people to see the divinity within each human being.  It should help us to foster that divinity.  It should make each person a god, in short.   Gandhi used scriptures, religious practices, prayers and self-disciplinary measures for that very purpose: to become a god.  That is why he could confidently say, “My life is my message.”  His life was indeed as divine as it could be for a human being.
Gandhi who defined God as Truth later changed the equation as: Truth is God.  When he speaks about Truth as God, Gandhi becomes a mystic.  “Truth is God.  This Truth is … that which alone is, which constitutes the stuff of which all things are made…”  [5]  The quest for God is the quest for Truth.  That is why Gandhi could affirm that “(God) is even the atheism of the atheist.” [6]
There are moments when Gandhi’s writing is very much like a mystic’s.  Look at this for example: “We are not, He alone Is.  And if we will be, we must eternally sing His praise and do His will.  Let us dance to the tune of His bansi – lute, and all would be well.” [7]
Ultimately Gandhi wanted to liberate man from the passions of the body and make him the spirit of Truth.  “How beautiful it would be, if all of us, young and old, men and women, devoted ourselves wholly to Truth in all that we might do in our waking hours, whether working, eating, drinking or playing, till dissolution of the body makes us one with Truth?” [8]
Gandhi was far superior to the ordinary man in his thinking and action.  That is why quite many people never understood him, and don’t understand him even today.  That is also why he had to pay for his vision with his life.  He was too great a burden for the ordinary soul to bear!
Notes:
1. Harijan: Jan 21, 1939
2. Young India: Jan 1, 1925
3. Harijan: April 28, 1946
4. Harijan: Feb 15, 1942
5. Ashram Observances in Action
6. Young India: Mar 5, 1925
7. Young India: Mar 5, 1925
8. From Yeravda Mandir, chapter 1
Author’s personal note: I am not a Gandhian scholar.  Nor can I dream of becoming his follower.  I am just a distant admirer of this great person.  The knowledge I gathered for this article comes from a few anthologies of Gandhi’s writings edited by Anand T. Hingorani, a devoted follower of Gandhi. [Matheikal]
Additional Note: This was written 4 years ago. I think it is still as valid as Lord Rama and Gautam Buddha would be valid.  As valid as Ayodhya and its struggles would be valid. As valid as Narendra Modi's stunts in America would be valid.  Whether Mr Modi will be a god in India for whom people will immolate themselves or kill others is something that I'm waiting to see. 
WISH YOU ALL  a happy gandhi jayanti


Comments

  1. I completely agree that "quite many people never understood him, and don’t understand him even today."
    "Gandhi was far superior to the ordinary man in his thinking and action" because his thoughts, words and deeds were always in perfect harmony. This was because, to him, conscience was supreme!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Today conscience has been sacrificed on the altar of wealth.

      Delete
  2. Dear sir,
    If people try to understand Gandhi, they should sacrifice their 'comfort zone' (their own shortcomings and evils) which they are really scared of doing.
    A well studied scholarly article. I think I missed it four years ago. Not even a line I remember.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gandhi continues to fascinate me, Wings. I'd read more about him at any time. Right now I'm reading Gurucharan Das's 'The Difficulty of Being Good' and I'm able to understand better why Gandhi would never have seen Krishna of the Mahabharat as a god; in fact, that Krishna was a villain.

      Delete
    2. I don't understand 'your villainy' here, sir. Don't you think we have to take such harsh decisions many times and call it right? If you write a blog portraying Krishna as a villain in Mahabharata, I may be able to understand the interpretation better.

      PS: I'm asking with complete objectivity. I don't have any reservation on Krishna. Your point is really intriguing. Please clarify or please write a blog for all of us, your readers.

      Delete
    3. When the Battle of Kurukshetra was won by the Pandavas, Krishna says, "Kauravas were great warriors and you could not have defeated them in a fair fight. So I had to use deceit, trickery and magic on your behalf."

      Jayadratha is killed by tricking him into believing that the sun had set since there is no fight after sunset. When he lets down his guard he is shot dead by Arjuna on Krishna's order.

      Knowing Karna's skill as a warrior, Krishna tries to entice him toward the Pandava camp by offering "enjoyment" with Draupati - sharing her as wife with his brothers.

      Karna is noble enough not to be enticed. Later when the wheel of his chariot is stuck in the mire, Arjuna refuses to shoot him citing the Kshatriya dharma that a warrior should not strike one who is not prepared. But Krishna orders him not to waste time. And the helpless Karna is shot dead by Arjuna.

      Again, it is Krishna who counsels Bhima to strike Duryodhana below the belt.

      Well, there are umpteen interpretations many of which justify Krishna's deeds. I would recommend Gurcharan Das's delightful book, 'The difficulty of being good.' Amazon.in is giving a wonderful discount.

      Delete
  3. Dear sir,
    If people try to understand Gandhi, they should sacrifice their 'comfort zone' (their own shortcomings and evils) which they are really scared of doing.
    A well studied scholarly article. I think I missed it four years ago. Not even a line I remember.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let me be a bit naughty, wings. If you click on the link given to the word "written" in the last para (additional note) you may have a little surprise.

      Delete
    2. Sorry. I'm not managing. The words were still haunting. "Read somewhere... have I read it?... " Kept thinking.
      I enjoyed your naughtiness, however. On seeing your words, instantly I realised that I had read it.

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Happy Gandhi Jayanti to you too.
    Thanks for sharing these nice points from the great man's writings.
    Gandhiji still inspires us.

    ReplyDelete
  6. For me and to adapt in my daily life, Mahatma Gandhi is a symbol of selflessness and forgiveness. Thank you Tomichand for sharing such meaningful and valuable insights through this article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I saw you status on FB regarding Gandhi. Liked it.

      Delete
  7. There are universities outside India that have schools for Gandhian studies. Not only Indians are fascinated by the greatness of Gandhi's ideas. Of course, a few of his ideas were outlandish. But on the whole, he was one of the greatest souls that lived in the 20th century.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sir, Gandhi's views as put by you show the true spirit of Hinduism. Great writing!! I salute to your writing!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed, that's the spirit of Hinduism which is essentially the spirit of openness and tolerance. It's very funny that some are demanding conversion to Hinduism nowadays when the religion never had any such concept as conversion earlier.

      Delete
  9. Except his opinion on castesim, I am in awe of Gandhiji. He is used as a marketing tool by politicians of independent India. Not even one represents even one percent of his ideals

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, see the way how Gandhi is being used by the present regime, the same people who denigrated Gandhi a few years ago.

      True, again, Gandhi had some odd views on the caste system and industries. While I accept that greed is a terrible vice fed by industrialisation, industries cannot be avoided.

      Delete
  10. very nice article and beautiful interpretion of mahabharata by Gandhi. I have always wondered how could someone write an epic like Mahabharata. It have everything in it.

    “How beautiful it would be, if all of us, young and old, men and women, devoted ourselves wholly to Truth in all that we might do in our waking hours, whether working, eating, drinking or playing, till dissolution of the body makes us one with Truth?” Very beautiful.

    Nice write up :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Vidya. Let me also welcome you to my story 'A Game of Dice,' based on the Mahabharata. In fact, the story is just the beginning of a series I'm planning based on the epic.

      What you've said is written in the epic: "there's nothing elsewhere what is not here."

      Delete
  11. Beautiful post. I am an atheist who is yet a believer, in the spirit of man.
    It was Vivekananda and Gandhi who helped me shape my perception of god.

    I'd recommend you read a book named 'What Religion is in the Words of Swami Vivekananda'. It is a collection of his speeches and ideas.

    I hope it helps undo the Hindutva 'Modi'fication of the secular Vivekananda who stressed harmony and acceptance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a long time since I decided to read on Vivekananda. For some reason or the other, it got postponed. Will catch up soon.

      My greatest worry is the re-creation of history that BJP and RSS have already started indulging in. See how Gandhi and Patel have been prised out of Congress and incorporated into the Parivar pantheon... A dangerous trend.

      Delete
  12. Matheikal, you highlighted quite rare about Gandhiji's belief in god. Often,we are thought about different gods pertaining to different religion but many fail to realize that God is one for all only the names given are different. Hope everyone had same opinion.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Do I Dare?

Alfred Prufrock was sitting in a dimly lit café when a young boy, who was yet to reach adolescence, walked in. The boy looked as inquisitive as Prufrock looked flurried. ‘Hello,’ the boy said. ‘You look so… lonely. And sad too.’ ‘Sad? No, not sad. Just… contemplating. I am, as they say, measuring out my life with coffee spoons.’ ‘Aw! That’s strange. On my planet, I measure things by sunsets. I love sunsets. How can you measure life with something so small as a coffee spoon?’ ‘Did you say “my planet”?’ ‘Well, yes. I come from another planet. I’ve been travelling for quite some time, you know. Went to numerous planets and asteroids and met many strange creatures. Quite a lot of them are cranky.’ The boy laughed gently, almost like an adult. Prufrock looked at the boy with some scepticism and suspicion. He was already having too many worries of his own like whether he should part his hair in the middle and roll up the bottoms of his trousers. ‘They call me Little Prince,’

Why Live?

More than 700,000 people choose to commit suicide every year in the world. That is, nearly 2000 individuals end their lives every day and suicide is the leading cause of death in the age group of 15 to 29. 10 Sep is the World Suicide Prevention Day . Let me join fellow bloggers Manali and Sukaina in their endeavour to draw more people’s attention to the value of life. One of the most persuasive essays on why we should not choose death voluntarily in spite of the ordeals and absurdities of life is The Myth of Sisyphus by Albert Camus. Camus’s basic premise is that life is absurd. It has no meaning other than what you give to it. The universe is indifferent to you, if not hostile. The confrontation between the human need for clarity and the chaotic irrationality of the world can lead to existential despair. Suicide is not the answer to that despair, however. Camus looks for a philosophical answer in his essay. Not many people find consolation in philosophy. Most people seek a

Ashwatthama is still alive

Fiction Image from Pinterest “I met Ashwatthama.” When Doctor Prabhakar told me this, I thought he was talking figuratively. Metaphors were his weaknesses. “The real virus is in the human heart, Jai,” he had told me when the pandemic named Covid-19 started holding the country hostage. I thought his Ashwatthama was similarly figurative. Ashwatthama was Dronacharya’s son in the Mahabharata. He was blessed with immortality by Shiva. But the blessing became a horrible curse when Krishna punished him for killing the Pandava kids deceptively after Kurukshetra was brought to peace, however fragile that peace was, using all the frauds that a god could possibly use. Krishna of the Kurukshetra was no less a fraud than a run-of-the-mill politician in my imagination. He could get an innocent elephant named Ashwatthama killed and then convert that killing into a blatant lie to demoralise Drona. He could ask Bhima to hit Duryodhana below the belt without feeling any moral qualms in what

Live Life Fully

Alexis Zorba, the protagonist of Nikos Kazantzakis’s novel Zorba the Greek , lives life to its fullness. He embraces human experience with his whole heart. He is not interested in rational explanations and intellectual isms. His philosophy, if you can call it that at all, is earthy, spontaneous and passionate. He loves life passionately. He celebrates it. Happiness is a simple affair for him. “I felt once more how simple and frugal a thing happiness is,” he tells us. “A glass of wine, a roast chestnut, a wretched little brazier, the sound of the sea. Nothing else.” You don’t need a lot of things to be happy. Your possessions don’t bring you happiness. All that money you spent on your big house, big car, big everything… It helps to show off. But happiness? No way, happiness doesn’t come that way at all. Zorba loves to play his musical instrument, santouri. He loves to sing. To dance. But don’t get me wrong. He works too. He works hard. There’s no fullness of life without that hard w