Skip to main content

The Palace of Illusions – Review


Book Review

The Mahabharata is a complex work.  Gods, demons and human beings interact freely making us wonder what really distinguishes one from the other.  Who is good and who is bad?  What is morality?  What is dharma?  The fabulous epic does not give very clear answers to these questions.  Is the complexity and inscrutability an integral part of the cosmic plan that unfolds in a process which we cannot alter much?  In other words, are we puppets in that cosmic game?  Do we really have free will?

Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni’s novel, The Palace of Illusions, is a retelling of the great epic from the point of view of Panchali, as Draupadi likes to call herself in the book.  The plot is the same.  The very same characters not leaving out the man-like gods and the whimsical sages.  The point of view is different and that matters pretty much.

Panchali is a rebel in Banerjee Divakaruni’s retelling of the epic.  “Perhaps that has always been my problem,” Panchali tells us in the novel, “to rebel against the boundaries society has prescribed for women.”  But the result is no superficial feminist take on Vyasa’s inimitable narrative.  On the contrary, the novel succeeds in retaining the profundity of the original and that is its greatness.  Panchali, in this avatar, is acutely aware of the alternative that awaits her if she does not rebel.  “To sit among bent grandmothers, gossiping and complaining, chewing on mashed betel leaves with toothless gums as I waited for death?”

Panchali is a different woman by any standard.  In an age when men could have many wives but no woman could have more than one husband without being labelled a prostitute, Panchali was ordained by destiny to live with five husbands.  She was also ordained to alter history in much more profound ways than that.  The Palace of Illusions tells us the story of that Panchali, her agonies and acts of rebellion, her demands from her husbands, and her secret love for Karna.

Every major character of the Mahabharata comes alive vividly in this novel.  Every paradox of human life that makes us wonder why we, human beings, couldn’t be a little more sensible, why we can’t love one another instead of dividing ourselves into us and them, why righteousness becomes the antithesis of love and kindness – yes, every paradox stares at us in page after page of the book just as it does in the great epic. 

Krishna, an avatar of god, is a manipulator in the novel just as he is in Vyasa’s epic.  Even god is helpless in the world of these human beings who are bent upon dividing the world into “mine” and “theirs”.  “Hasn’t this (divisiveness) been the cause of your troubles,” Krishna asks Dhritarashtra, “ever since the fatherless sons of Pandu arrived at Hastinapur?  If you had seen them all as yours to love, this war would never have occurred.”

“Wasn’t it the cause of my troubles, too?” wonders Draupadi.  “Of every trouble in this world?”

Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni
Wasn’t it the cause of quite a lot of the problems that plague Bharat even today?  A reader may wonder while reading that part.

The novel should be read by all Indians even if they have read the Mahabharata.  Just to remind ourselves of the depth of our great epic (which is more boasted about than read and understood).  Of course, the epic can be interpreted in infinitely varied ways.  The Palace of Illusions is one of those possible interpretations.  And that interpretation is very relevant in today’s India.  

The conclusion of the novel is given to Draupadi, naturally since she is the protagonist here.  And that conclusion is a grand mystical vision, a profound interpretation of the epic, a penetrating peep into the advaita that our ancient scriptures taught and is totally forgotten by the contemporary sainiks in cultural armours. 

This review started with some questions which the epic tries to answer.  The novel also tries to answer them and succeeds eminently. 


Comments

  1. Seems a potential read for me. Coincidently, I too reviewed a mythological fiction based on Mahabharata. It looks like mythological fiction is an ongoing trend.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Myths can always be revisited fruitfully. Reinterpreted they can open up a whole new set of truths.

      Delete
  2. WHat a great review! I've read this book and I was pleasantly surprised by Draupadi's POV of the Mahabharata. I agree with you when you say that every Indian should read this book for a fresh perspective.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you like the review especially since you have read the book.

      Delete
  3. Great review. Detailed and up to the point

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Mahabharata is one work of literature that will survive centuries ahead. We can be inspired to write books and books... And this is a good work by the novelist.

      Delete
  4. I have to read it, particularly because it is written from Draupadi's perspective. What similarity, if any, did you find in Chitra's Draupadi and your own..?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You will love it, Sunaina.

      The rebel in me refuses to be tamed. That's why characters like Draupadi fascinate me. There is much in common to my Draupadi and Chitra's. But Chitra's portrayal is deeper - it's a novel, after all.

      Delete
    2. Started reading the book. It is interesting indeed!

      Delete
  5. Lovely review. After Bhishma, Draupadi has always been my fav character in Mahabharata. Adding this book to my reading list.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bhishma stood helpless before Draupadi. That's part of the complexity of the epic. "Dharma is subtle," he washed his hands when she questioned him watching her being disrobed...

      Delete
  6. Mythology is the flavor of season. I have read a couple of them & liked few too. Will read this book. Looks interesting.

    Garima, http://www.sweetsharing.com/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Originally published in 2008, this book probably precedes most others of the type and I believe is better too.

      Delete
  7. Not only Panchali, but other women characters too have been made to become legends in this novel. Compelling read!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Not only Panchali, but other women characters too have been made to become legends in this novel. Compelling read!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Florentino’s Many Loves

Florentino Ariza has had 622 serious relationships (combo pack with sex) apart from numerous fleeting liaisons before he is able to embrace the only woman whom he loved with all his heart and soul. And that embrace happens “after a long and troubled love affair” that lasted 51 years, 9 months, and 4 days. Florentino is in his late 70s when he is able to behold, and hold as well, the very body of his beloved Fermina, who is just a few years younger than him. She now stands before him with her wrinkled shoulders, sagged breasts, and flabby skin that is as pale and cold as a frog’s. It is the culmination of a long, very long, wait as far as Florentino is concerned, the end of his passionate quest for his holy grail. “I’ve remained a virgin for you,” he says. All those 622 and more women whose details filled the 25 diaries that he kept writing with meticulous devotion have now vanished into thin air. They mean nothing now that he has reached where he longed to reach all his life. The

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Unromantic Men

Romance is a tenderness of the heart. That is disappearing even from the movies. Tenderness of heart is not a virtue anymore; it is a weakness. Who is an ideal man in today’s world? Shakespeare’s Romeo and Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay’s Devdas would be considered as fools in today’s world in which the wealthiest individuals appear on elite lists, ‘strong’ leaders are hailed as nationalist heroes, and success is equated with anything other than traditional virtues. The protagonist of Colleen McCullough’s 1977 novel, The Thorn Birds [which sold more than 33 million copies], is torn between his idealism and his natural weaknesses as a human being. Ralph de Bricassart is a young Catholic priest who is sent on a kind of punishment-appointment to a remote rural area of Australia where the Cleary family arrives from New Zealand in 1921 to take care of the enormous estate of Mary Carson who is Paddy Cleary’s own sister. Meggy Cleary is the only daughter of Paddy and Fiona who have eight so

Octlantis

I was reading an essay on octopuses when friend John walked in. When he is bored of his usual activities – babysitting and gardening – he would come over. Politics was the favourite concern of our conversations. We discussed politics so earnestly that any observer might think that we were running the world through the politicians quite like the gods running it through their devotees. “Octopuses are quite queer creatures,” I said. The essay I was reading had got all my attention. Moreover, I was getting bored of politics which is irredeemable anyway. “They have too many brains and a lot of hearts.” “That’s queer indeed,” John agreed. “Each arm has a mind of its own. Two-thirds of an octopus’s neurons are found in their arms. The arms can taste, touch, feel and act on their own without any input from the brain.” “They are quite like our politicians,” John observed. Everything is linked to politics in John’s mind. I was impressed with his analogy, however. “Perhaps, you’re r

Country without a national language

India has no national language because the country has too many languages. Apart from the officially recognised 22 languages are the hundreds of regional languages and dialects. It would be preposterous to imagine one particular language as the national language in such a situation. That is why the visionary leaders of Independent India decided upon a three-language policy for most purposes: Hindi, English, and the local language. The other day two pranksters from the Hindi belt landed in Bengaluru airport wearing T-shirts declaring Hindi as the national language. They posted a picture on X and it evoked angry responses from a lot of Indians who don’t speak Hindi.  The worthiness of Hindi to be India’s national language was debated umpteen times and there is nothing new to add to all that verbiage. Yet it seems a reminder is in good place now for the likes of the above puerile young men. Language is a power-tool . One of the first things done by colonisers and conquerors is to