Skip to main content

Veer Savarkar and Amit Shah


“We want to tell him (Rahul Gandhi) that we are honoured to be called followers of Savarkar…he was sentenced to life imprisonment by the British. He jumped into the sea, escaping from the clutches of British soldiers and swam for 10 km, and fought for Independence.”  Amit Shah thundered while addressing a farmer’s rally in a Surat village.   This is yet another instance of his party’s relentless efforts at rewriting the history of India. 

What kind of a person was this ‘Veer’ Savarkar in reality?

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar was brought to the Cellular Jail in the Andamans in 1911 after his conviction for the murder of A.T.M. Jackson, Collector of Nashik district, who was "sympathetic towards Indian aspirations."  Within six months of his imprisonment, he submitted a petition for mercy to the British government in India.  In 1913, he submitted his second petition in which he wrote: "I am ready to serve the (British) Government in any capacity they like... . Where else can the prodigal son return but to the parental doors of the Government?" [emphasis added]1

Savarkar even went to the extent of submitting himself totally to the British Empire.  "I and my brother are perfectly willing to give a pledge of not participating in politics for a definite and reasonable period that the Government would indicate... .This or any pledge, e.g., of remaining in a particular province or reporting our movements to the police for a definite period after our release - any such reasonable conditions meant genuinely to ensure the safety of the State would be gladly accepted by me and my brother."2

Savarkar’s jumping into the sea, which Amit Shah mythifies in his Surat speech, was not when he was sentenced to life imprisonment.  It took place in March 1910 when Savarkar was arrested at London’s Victoria Terminal railway station as soon his train arrived there from Paris.  They sent him back to India by ship in order to prosecute him for his 1906 anti-government speech in Bombay. Next morning, Savarkar escaped through a porthole and swam ashore where he was arrested again. The reality is quite different from what Amit Shah wants us to believe.

Savarkar’s complicity in the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi is also proved beyond doubt.  In his crime report No.1, the main police investigating officer, Jimmy Nagarvala, stated that "Savarkar was at the back of the conspiracy and that he was feigning illness."3 Savarkar was not ‘veer’ enough to admit his role, however.  Rather, in a letter to the Commissioner of Police, Bombay, on 22 Feb 1948, he wrote: "Consequently, in order to disarm all suspicion ... I wish to express my willingness to give an undertaking to the government that I shall refrain from taking part in any communal or political public activity for any period the government may require in case I am released on that condition." The supplication was contemptuously rejected.4

In fact, tendering apologies and pleading pathetically for mercy was an integral part of Savarkar’s personality.  He indulged in those exercises in 1911, 1913, 1925, 1948 and 1950. 

For half a century after India’s Independence the Right wingers never owned up Savarkar.  It was only in 2000 that the BJP took him under its mantle, long after memories were buried and when distortions would be accepted as truths by the millennial generation. 

Savarkar “died a lonely man,” says Subhash Gatade, “abhorred especially by the thriving 'Parivar' then, which made special efforts to maintain distance from him in those days.”5

A lot of history is being rewritten these days by Amit Shah and his people.  It is the duty of Indians to pursue the truth.  Satyameva Jayate is our national motto, after all, and it comes from our ancient scriptures, Mundaka Upanishad.

Notes
1 & 2: Savarkar’s Mercy Petition, A. G. Noorani, Frontline.
3 & 4: Savarkar and Gandhi, A. G. Noorani, Frontline.
5: The Iconisation of Savarkar, Subhash Gatade, Countercurrents.


Comments

  1. Even in the narrative at the sound and light show at Cellular jail in Port Blair it is Veer Savarkar who is highlighted and praised. Must have been rewritten by BJP?
    Thank you for the enlightenment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The young generation is not aware of the real heroes who are being villainised by BJP. and the party is harvesting on the ignorance.

      Delete
  2. I'm so happy to have read your piece Matheikal. I knew there was some controversy around Veer Savarkar but now I know exactly what it is. I wish the BJP and Amit Shah would stop rewriting history.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ulterior motives are particularly dangerous when fraudulence gains acceptance as truth which is what is happening now. I hope people will see through the games.

      Delete
  3. Interesting and informative..
    Thank you Tom sir!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Most welcome, Amit ji. I had no choice but write this.

      Delete
  4. Good post.. I was not aware of this story of Veer Savarkar.. thanks for sharing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Awareness is becoming an urgency nowadays, Sneh. I'm fulfilling my duty as a teacher.

      Delete
  5. Manipulation of history and young, unquestioning minds is the scariest of prospects for the country and the world. If there is an urgent need of the hour, it is to teach future generations the art of questioning and critical thinking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Smart phones have destroyed those things. Chatting has taken the place of questioning. General awareness is dismal. Genuine quest has vanished.

      Delete
    2. If that is true then why Indira Gandhi govt issued postal stamp on veer savarkar and manmohan Singh when he was prime minister called him patriot amit shah not rewriting the history but congress has been concealing the true history as veer savarkar was strong opponent of Gandhi and his Gandhian thoughts.veer savarkar may have given mercy petitions.but his motives were genuine to get freed at any cost his vision was clear right from the beginning from his sea jump.he was not freed although he was sent to house arrest for 15 years in ratnagiri.in his ratnagiri tenure he had done so many social revolutionary activities he had established patitpavan mandir for all castes .on gandhi murder Dr b.r ambedkar once said that in Gandhi murder there is not any single proof against savarkar .veer savarkar has done huge to Marathi literature as his views were in Marathi people like you taking advantage and and making false allegations

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

India in Modi-Trap

That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. Illustration by Gemini AI A friend forwarded a WhatsApp message written by K Sahadevan, Malayalam writer and social activist. The central theme is a concern for science education and research in India. The writer bemoans the fact that in India science is in a prison conjured up by Narendra Modi. The message shocked me. I hadn’t been aware of many things mentioned therein. Modi is making use of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Centre for Study and Research in Indology for his nefarious purposes projected as efforts to “preserve and promote classical Indian knowledge systems [IKS]” which include Sanskrit, Ayurveda, Jyotisha (astrology), literature, philosophy, and ancient sciences and technology. The objective is to integrate science with spirituality and cultural values. That’s like harnessing a telescope to a Vedic chant and expecting the stars to spin closer. The IKS curricula have made umpteen r...

Two Women and Their Frustrations

Illustration by Gemini AI Nora and Millie are two unforgettable women in literature. Both are frustrated with their married life, though Nora’s frustration is a late experience. How they deal with their personal situations is worth a deep study. One redeems herself while the other destroys herself as well as her husband. Nora is the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House , and Millie is her counterpart in Terence Rattigan’s play, The Browning Version . [The links take you to the respective text.] Personal frustration leads one to growth into an enlightened selfhood while it embitters the other. Nora’s story is emancipatory and Millie’s is destructive. Nora questions patriarchal oppression and liberates herself from it with equanimity, while Millie is trapped in a meaningless relationship. Since I have summarised these plays in earlier posts, now I’m moving on to a discussion on the enlightening contrasts between these two characters. If you’re interested in the plot ...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...