Skip to main content

Can religion be delinked from politics?


India is passing through a historical period of self-purification.  Our Prime Minister is putting an end to black money and corruption.  Our Supreme Court is feeding patriotism into our hearts via cinema halls.  Now the apex court has weaned our politics from our gods.  125 crore Indians may go down in history as the people who sanitised a whole polity.

Can politics exist without corruption?  Can greed be washed out of human hearts?  Can religion be separated from public affairs especially politics?

Politics and Corruption

Corruption is an integral part of politics simply because politics is about power and power is about subordination of most people by a few.  Subordination, swindling, manipulation, exploitation... these are the normal synonyms of power unless you are a dyed-in-the-wool idealist.  There is no power structure without bribery, cronyism, nepotism, extortion, parochialism, embezzlement, and whatever helps one climb up the endless rungs of the ascent. 

As Carl Sagan said, we have been bamboozled so long in history that our minds are tuned to reject the deception.  “We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth.  The bamboozle has captured us.  It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken.  Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” [The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark]

Source
Go back to the history books once again.  A careful peep into them will tell us that our history is full of blood and filth.  Because charlatans of one type or another sat at the apex of the power structures with very few exceptions.  Only charlatans actually reach there.  And they learn the latest tricks of the trade.  They know how to bamboozle us in new ways.  Look at who were caught with wads and wads of the new currency soon after the demonetisation and think whether demonetisation actually achieved anything good.

Does it mean that attempts should not be made to cleanse the system?  Not at all.  The attempts should be genuine and effective. 

If you want to change a particular system effectively, you have to replace it with a better system.  I quoted Carl Sagan intentionally because the title of the book from which the quote is taken gives a hint to a better solution: science as the candle in the dark.  Bring more rational thinking into people’s minds.  Make people think and realise why cooperation is better than competition, why sharing is more beneficial than grabbing, how rational approaches can solve more problems more effectively than emotional approaches...

Politics and Religion

Religion and politics were handmaidens of each other right from the days of the Brahmin priests and the Kshatriya warriors who colluded with one another in order to hoodwink the others.  Right from the days of divine right of kings and queens in the West.  Right from the days of the first estate(religion) and the second estate(aristocrats) in France where a historical Revolution ended up creating a worse system because the new alternative was also merely political led by a new set of aristocrats with their versions of gods.  Is it possible to cut the umbilical cord between politics and religion just by a court ruling?

There is a diabolic connection between religion and politics in India even today.  There are godmen, gurus and ammas who control fabulous empires with the help of politicians.  Most political parties in the country today derive their strength from one religious sect or another. 

The solution, once again, is not a court order.  Carl Sagan is a far better solution. 

A paradigm shift is what is required.  But the present regime in India is incapable of bringing about that paradigm shift.  Their intentions are not genuine.  Look at the huge amounts dedicated to erecting certain statues, for example, and you will understand where the motives are rooted.  Look at the kinds of people to whom financial supports are extended in thousands of crores of rupees and you will understand the deeper games.

That’s why Carl Sagan is right. “Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.”



Comments

  1. Yes well articulated piece . The nexus between religion and politics are inseparable. I think order from court is not going to change it...the need for rational thought process in the minds of society is best panacea...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Only the people can make the difference. A conscious and informed choice.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Don Bosco

Don Bosco (16 Aug 1815 - 31 Jan 1888) In Catholic parlance, which flows through my veins in spite of myself, today is the Feast of Don Bosco. My life was both made and unmade by Don Bosco institutions. Any great person can make or break people because of his followers. Religious institutions are the best examples. I’m presenting below an extract from my forthcoming book titled Autumn Shadows to celebrate the Feast of Don Bosco in my own way which is obviously very different from how it is celebrated in his institutions today. Do I feel nostalgic about the Feast? Not at all. I feel relieved. That’s why this celebration. The extract follows. Don Bosco, as Saint John Bosco was popularly known, had a remarkably good system for the education of youth.   He called it ‘preventive system’.   The educators should be ever vigilant so that wrong actions are prevented before they can be committed.   Reason, religion and loving kindness are the three pillars of that syste...

Coffee can be bitter

The dawns of my childhood were redolent of filtered black coffee. We were woken up before the birds started singing in the lush green village landscape outside home. The sun would split the darkness of the eastern sky with its splinter of white radiance much after we children had our filtered coffee with a small lump of jaggery. Take a bite of the jaggery and then a sip of the coffee. Coffee was a ritual in our home back then. Perhaps our parents believed it would jolt our neurons awake and help us absorb our lessons before we set out on the 4-kilometre walk to school after all the morning rituals at home. After high school, when I left home for further studies at a distant place, the ritual of the morning coffee stopped. It resumed a whole decade later when I completed my graduation and took up a teaching job in Shillong. But I had lost my taste for filtered coffee by then; tea took its place. Plain tea without milk – what is known as red tea in most parts of India. Coffee ret...

Relatives and Antidepressants

One of the scenes that remain indelibly etched in my memory is from a novel of Malayalam writer O V Vijayan. Father and little son are on a walk. Father tells son, “Walk carefully, son, otherwise you may fall down.” Son: “What will happen if I fall?” Father: "Relatives will laugh.” I seldom feel comfortable with my relatives. In fact, I don’t feel comfortable in any society, but relatives make it more uneasy. The reason, as I’ve understood, is that your relatives are the last people to see any goodness in you. On the other hand, they are the first ones to discover all your faults. Whenever certain relatives visit, my knees buckle and the blood pressure shoots up. I behave quite awkwardly. They often describe my behaviour as arising from my ego, which used to be a oversized in yesteryear. I had a few such visitors the other day. The problem was particularly compounded by their informing me that they would be arriving by about 3.30 pm and actually reaching at about 7.30 pm. ...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...