Skip to main content

Majority are seldom right

One of the readers wrote the above as a comment on a Frontline article.  It would deserve no attention whatsoever had it not been becoming a dominant perspective in the country.  What the man is saying in short is: India belongs to Hindus and the others have no rights.

The view in the comment is rather self-contradictory.  On the one hand, the writer is saying that India is superior to the “40” Islamic countries because Hindus are “by nature secular.”  On the other hand, he is arguing for saffronisation of the country.  This contradiction is inherent in most right wing perspectives these days.  That is because people know that Hindutva is essentially an unwholesome ideology founded on hatred and little else. 

However, what really intrigues me is not the hatred that underlies the ideology or not even the contradictions exhibited by its upholders.  When people argue that the majority is right or that the majority have all rights, I cannot but laugh. 

First of all, the majority are seldom right.  There is nothing called a group mind.  A group cannot think uniformly.  The group’s decision is just an approximation, a compromise.  Decisions made by the majority are good for choosing a leader or the colour of a flag.  When it comes to serious matters, especially those with moral implications, we can’t go by the majority.  As Mahatma Gandhi (whom the right wing loves to hate) said, “In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.”

Secondly, who are the majority?  The notion that all the Hindus in India form a homogeneous majority is simply wrong.  There are thousands and thousands of Hindus who do not support what the Sangh outfits do.  How many Hindus in India support the attacks on the people belonging to minority communities in the name of cows or other such things?  A few thousand disgruntled people are trying to impose their will on the nation and calling it the majority will.  They use religion as a tool in the process because religion has the power to evoke powerful sentiments.

Bertrand Russell argued time and again that no opinion becomes legitimate simply because the majority support it.  In fact, what the majority supports may often be absurd or silly when subjected to logical analysis.  In the words of Russell, “in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widely spread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.”

This argument that the country belongs to the majority and that the majority have all the right to decide what others will eat, speak, worship, etc is the best illustration of what Russell said.  What’s more ridiculous than a bunch of mediocre people gathering with lathis in hand and enforcing some savage notions on a nation in the name of religion and culture and then claiming the sanction of majority for such deeds?


  1. But what is the definition of majority in a secular country, I couldn't understand. All the political parties somehow project themselves as secular,but then they discriminate one nation into majorities and minorities!

    I wonder who are at fault in distorting the definition of secularism - the politicians or the religious population?

    1. The writer of the comment in question here defines majority in terms of religion. If we drop the religious identity, then who are the majority in India? I'm sure some idiot will come up with another divisive parameter like language.

      The leader is ultimately responsible for what the nation is. If the prime minister wants he can change the present animosity in the country into an air of cooperation. But he wants this animosity to build up into the 2002 Gujarat kind of situation.

  2. Thanks for visiting and for your lovely comment. The tapioca pancake is famous in Singapore, Malaysia and Brunei, I think other countries have a different way to prepare it..


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti

Whose India?

“If you keep doing the same things, you will keep getting the same results,” Dave Ramsey said. It doesn’t matter who Dave Ramsey is. I don’t know, in fact. Albert Einstein could have said that as well. From the time BJP came to power in Delhi, India has been doing more or less the same thing: sectarian politics which favours one particular community and marginalises all others. Since the majority of Indians belong to the community favoured by BJP, no other party could arrive at an effective strategy for winning elections. People obviously want favours from those in power. And BJP is giving those favours to the majority. The majority will then vote BJP. BJP continues to rule. Happily. Till date. And so some genius in the other camp struck upon a strategy. Divide the majority community along caste lines. This is not a new strategy at all. This was effectively made use of in all the Hindi belt states earlier many times by many parties. What is new now is that almost all the non-BJP

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Face of the Faceless

“When you choose to fight for truth and justice, you will have to face serious threats.” Sister Rani Maria, the protagonist of the movie, is counselled by her mother in a letter. Face of the Faceless is a movie that shows how serious those threats are. This movie is a biopic. It shows us the life of a Catholic nun who dedicated her life to serve some Adivasis of Madhya Pradesh [MP] and ended up as a martyr. If it were not a real story, this movie would have been an absolute flop. Since it is the real story of not only a nun but also the impoverished and terribly exploited Adivasis in a particular village of MP, it keeps you engrossed. It is a sad movie, right from the beginning to the end. It is a story of the good versus evil, the powerless versus the powerful, the heroic versus the villainous, the divine versus the diabolic. Having said that, I must hasten to add one conspicuous fact: the movie does not ever present Christianity or its religious practices as the only right way

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart