Everyone wants to be
happy. The Dalai Lama, head of Tibetan Buddhism,
is of the opinion that we possess the key to happiness. We are like the person who has been knocking
on a door again and again without ever checking whether the door was locked in
the first place. The door to happiness is
not locked. So we don’t need any
key. We just need a change of attitudes.
Image Courtesy |
We are like the woman who
was searching for her lost earring in the sunlit front yard of the house though
she had lost it inside the house. When
asked about it she said, “But there’s no light inside.” She was searching for the right thing in the
wrong place. We keep searching for
happiness in wrong places like wealth, position, luxury, etc.
The Dalai Lama puts compassion in the top of the list of
attitudes that generate happiness.
Compassion for other people is essential not only for our personal inner
development but also for happiness. A
happy human being feels responsibility towards other people. He respects others. Happy people accept other people’s right to happiness.
The Dalai Lama argues that acknowledging other people’s right to
happiness keeps us connected to those people which is the true basis of
compassion.
But happiness is not an
individual affair totally. That is why
Bhutan speaks about gross national
happiness and tries to promote that rather than gross national product. Bhutan is not the happiest nation according to
surveys, however. Denmark is. More than two-thirds of the Danes are very
contented with their lives, according to certain surveys. The problem with surveys is that they are
conducted in limited spheres. Bhutan was
probably not part of any of those surveys.
Never mind. We are interested in
the findings that will help us become happy rather than knowing which country
is the happiest.
Denmark is a welfare
state. It has a prosperous economy and a
well-functioning democracy. It has the
highest level of income equality.
Psychologists who analysed the surveys also found that the Danes do not
have particularly high expectations about the future. Psychologists like Ed Diener and Joseph
Smiley (who are known as happiness researchers) have shown that the average
life satisfaction of nations is highly related to income. In other words, wealth does play an important role in happiness. These happiness researchers also found that
happiness is not an individual affair; it is associated with social variables
like trust, safety, and lack of
corruption.
Now we know why India cannot be a happy nation. In fact, India ranks very low in the list of
happy nations in spite of all the propaganda dished out by the Modi government
about development and tackling of corruption.
Modi and his party are promoting the welfare of a particular group of
people. The group is amorphous hitherto
because it calls itself Hindu but excludes Dalits and all poor people like
farmers. It claims to include anyone who
is willing to call himself a Hindu even if he or she is a Muslim or Christian
or whatever. The problem with Modi is
that he is not a visionary who can spell out clearly the ideological
foundations of his view. Yes he is clear
about one thing: hatred. He hates a
whole lot of people. But hatred can
never bring in happiness. Compassion is an
essential component of happiness. That’s why Modi has to change himself. Or India has to change him.
Let India awake. Let India be a happy
nation.
Such a coincidence! Some hours ago I wanted to write about happiness, but then decided to write about peanuts:p
ReplyDeleteAristotle showed that the secret of happiness lies in being rational and virtuous. His doctrine of mean points out that extreme acts of anything doesn't lead one to happiness. Whether it is extreme depravity or being extremely differential! Hatred is extreme form of being differential. No one can remain happy in such state.
Also happiness is an activity not a state. It requires effort. Continuous effort.
Reason and virtue. There is no other way to happiness. Virtue is being defined today in India wrongly as nationalism.
DeleteHappiness is a journey not a destination - just to restate what you said 😊
Thought provoking post, sir. But i don't think anything on Earth could change him.
ReplyDeleteI find happiness in my dreams of uncertainity😊
Finding personal happiness is easier than it is for a nation. Given our country's present situation, uncertainty is the best option 😊
DeleteMost of the people are trying to improve things for themselves. Compassion, thinking about others, or putting others first doesn't come easily. Happiness remains a chase for that very reason. There are expectations which remain unfulfilled. There are desires, wants oh so many. How can we become happy? Only children know that stay of happiness which we yearn for but attain not. I liked so many points you raised about happiness - income, trust, good relationships- there are so many contributors to this state of joy. But most of us are struggling for everything. And we are not 'giving' .
ReplyDeleteThe system has made us all so selfish as well as insensitive. That's why, I think, a systemic change is necessary. How much can one keep changing oneself when the system is out to exploit us?
DeleteI think...after writing the last stanza you became very happy...just a thought but agree with some of the points.
ReplyDeleteAm I wrong there in the last para? Do you think a change of leader can make a difference?
DeleteNo you are not wrong but the truth is...whatever happening in vast fields we are responsible for all these...blame game will not gonna solve any problem...less or more we all are busy with the blame game.
DeleteNone on Earth can change the Indian prime minister because he is successful - successful in creating a herd of blind supporters (say sycophants or CHAMACHAAs) for him. And let me tell plain and straight that (recognised and visible) success is perhaps the biggest misguiding factor for any individual because it blinds him / her to his / her deficiencies. And one truth is eternal - we always get the leaders we deserve. The Indian premier does not hate anybody or any community, he only hates failure - failure in polls and failure in the chesslike game aiming at gaining and retaining political power
ReplyDeleteIt is an alarming game too that he is playing. By the time he finishes his game will India belong to all Indians?
DeleteNo ! Definitely not ! However by that time, he would have lived his life to his full (grandiose and sadistic) satisfaction. He knows it very well and that's why he doesn't care at all for that.
ReplyDelete