The murderous priest and the nun with the victim in the foreground Image from LiveLaw |
Dostoevsky’s unforgettable
character Raskolnikov commits a murder to prove to himself that he is above the
common man’s morality. He kills a despicable woman who is a ruthless usurer and
hence won’t be missed by anyone. In the process, however, he is forced to kill
that woman’s sister too, who is a good person, in order to get rid of the
inconvenient witness. The crime doesn’t prove what Raskolnikov wanted it to.
Instead of proving his superiority to average human beings, the murders leave
him with a restless conscience. Eventually he has to confess. There is no other
way.
The person who convinces
Raskolnikov that he had indeed committed a crime against no less than the humanity
itself is a prostitute. Sonia had chosen prostitution as a profession out of
sheer helplessness. She is a saintly person at heart.
A self-righteous murderer and
a saintly prostitute: one of the many contrasting pairs that Dostoevsky
created. The murderer learns with the help of the prostitute that his crime is
not only the murders he committed but also the hubris of placing himself above
his fellow beings. If Sonia commits sins (of prostitution) it is for the sake
of an entire family that depends on her for survival. While she has placed
herself at the service of her helpless sister and her children, Raskolnikov
places himself conceitedly above the others. Sonia tells him to kiss the earth
and confess his sins to the entire humanity. His crime is against humanity. Hubris
is also part of that crime. Raskolnikov learns morality from a prostitute.
Raskolnikov
and Sonia were the first characters to rush to my mind as I read about the
verdict passed on a Catholic priest and nun yesterday in
Kerala in 28-year-old case. The priest and the nun are murderers. They murdered
an innocent young nun who happened to witness their illicit physical
relationship. The murder was committed with a small axe. Incidentally, Raskolnikov
too had used an axe for his crime.
Unlike Raskolnikov, the priest
and the nun continued to live normal lives for nearly three decades. In spite
of massive protests and media coverage in Kerala for a long period, the priest
and the nun continued to live as if nothing had happened. Even the most
villainous characters of Dostoevsky would put their heads down in shame seeing
how the priest and the nun could deceive their own consciences so smoothly. The
nun had even gone to the extent of getting hymenoplasty done to mislead the
court. [That’s nothing, of course, compared to what all the Church did to save
the priest-nun couple from justice.]
Self-deception of the type indulged
in by this priest and the nun requires extraordinary thickness of skin.
Thickness of conscience, that is. They were people of god. Representatives of
Jesus on earth. Pity Jesus! How many crucifixions he has endured because of his
representatives in the church founded in his name!
The nun is reported to have broken
down when the verdict was read out. It couldn’t have been tears of remorse, of
course. She might have thought about the wretchedness that awaited her in a
prison cell in contrast to the regal life that her convent afforded her. The priest
was seen telling the media people just after the verdict that he was innocent
and he would be judged fairly in “God’s court”. He looked vilely nonchalant. Siberia
reformed Raskolnikov, but the priest didn’t show any indication of following in
the footsteps of Dostoevsky’s protagonist.
On the contrary, he is likely
to be projected as a martyr by the Catholic
Church when the appropriate time comes. The Church has perpetrated worse
atrocities with its criminal priests. One Benedict, a priest who had an adulterous
relationship with a woman whom he killed eventually, is now being projected as
a saintly figure who suffered gratuitously in the jail for a crime committed supposedly
by somebody else. Nuns are not so lucky, however. This nun may end up in
absolute oblivion sooner than later. She may even redeem herself by confessing
the truth even as Raskolnikov did.
Tailpiece:
Now if Franco Mulakkal is also arrested, they can together establish a diocese
in the jail, says one of my friends.
Well, yes. The biggest deceit committed by a majority of human-beings is deceit to themselves only. Genuine contrition is experienced only by the (rare) saintly ones whose deserve forgiveness if not by the law or the world, then at least by themselves.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure you have also noticed that the professionally religious people, including those in politics like yogis and modis, are incapable of 'contrition'.
DeleteThe way Dostevsky portrayed the conscience of Raskolnikov after that murders is a real torture to the collective human psyche.
ReplyDeleteGuilt is terrible to bear for ordinary mortals. But the number of extraordinary ones is ever on the rise.
Delete28 years is a long time for justice. Sr. Abhaya’s parents died waiting for it. Convicts can appeal.
ReplyDeleteTrue. Delayed justice is injustice.
Delete