‘The Last Lesson’ is a short story written by French writer Alphonse Daudet [1840-1897] about the Franco-German War [1870]. France loses the war and two of its provinces, Alsace and Lorraine, are lost to Bismarck’s Germany. German language and culture are imposed on the people of Alsace and Lorraine.
In the story, M Hamel is a
teacher in Alsace who has to leave the school where he has been teaching for 40
years. A German teacher will take over tomorrow. A nine-year-old student,
Franz, feels pity for his old teacher and also for himself because he never
used M Hamel’s classes for learning his own language. M Hamel teaches his last
lesson. There is a palpable sadness in the classroom accentuated by an eerie
silence that descends as the students do their writing tasks. A few pigeons sat
on the roof of the building cooing soberly. Franz asks himself, “Will they make
them sing in German, even the pigeons?”
Imposing a language and
culture on a community of people is what nationalism essentially is.
A nation is an imagined
political community, as Benedict Anderson said. Some people agree to live
together guided by certain rules and regulations for their own welfare,
progress, and security. Beyond that welfare and security, people are
individuals with their own ideas and convictions about most realities. These
individual differences are important too. A nation should not bulldoze over
them. But nationalism often does precisely that.
Nationalism is useful only
when a nation is faced with political dangers from outside. Indian nationalism
was valid as an opposition to the British rule. Once we are a free nation, nationalism
has little to do unless one particular community wants to impose its own
culture and other concomitants on others. In other words, nationalism is always
about fighting against some enemies who are perceived to be outsiders. The
British were outsiders. Once they left, some people within are projected as
outsiders so that nationalism has its fodder-enemy.
This is a kind of tribal mentality,
says Karl Popper, one of the greatest philosophers of the 20th
century. Nationalism narrows our thinking to the confines of our own tribe, our
own clan, our own noses. Our culture, our language, our religion… A nationalist
cannot think beyond those ‘ours’.
Bismarck was a nationalist
guided by tribal instincts. He wanted all people of German origins to be one
nation (one tribe). The people of Alsace and Lorraine did not want to be
separated from France and become parts of Germany. Yet Bismarck took them by
force. He wanted to impose his language on the pigeons! That is nationalism in
effect.
India has arguably more
diversity than any other nation. This diversity is one of its charms. Why would
anyone want to destroy it by homogenisation? Why have one language instead of
the 2000 languages? Why have one religion if people wish to have their own gods?
Why impose your culture on others? [The situation has become so ludicrous that
many nationalist states have even enacted rules about who can love whom!]
Petty minds think that their
culture, their religion, their language are the best. They erect a whole civilisational
edifice consisting of these with its foundation lying in some prehistoric
myths. They fight wars in the name of that mythical edifice. They kill. Killing
is sacred because it is for a cause projected as noble: nationalism. In plain
words, nationalism is just a veneer of sophistication thrown over the violent
instincts of people who refused or failed to become civilised enough to accept
the otherness of others.
PS. Written for Indispire Edition 354: Yuval Noah Harari referred to
nationalism as fiction. A nation is a community held together by people's
imagination. Do you agree? #Nationalism
A thought provoking post!
ReplyDeleteWhy did Gandhi want to disband Congress after Independence? Just a thought.
Delete