Suffering is the university of
egocentrism. Milan Kundera, Czech writer [1929-]
Suffering is inevitable. That is a fundamental lesson of life. Religions
teach us that, philosophy does, and literature shows the same too. While
dealing with the inevitable though unwanted, our options are quite limited. We
should change what can be changed and accept what cannot be changed. We may
need to adapt ourselves in the face of what we cannot change.
Religion, philosophy, the arts, and a lot of
things can help us to make life easier in the face of suffering. Aren’t these
things primarily meant for that: to help us make life bearable and as pleasant
as possible?
Why haven’t they been able to achieve their
purposes? Obviously, they have not been used rightly. On the other hand, they
have been misused by certain people. Religion joined hands with politics and became
a tool in the hands of bigots or the power-hungry. Philosophy is dead for all
practical purposes, killed by our pursuit of the superficial and by the
prevalence of the farcical. The arts have been too commercialised to be
effective agents of personal or social transformation.
The solution obviously lies in bringing
authenticity and a certain degree of profundity back to these things: religion,
thinking and the arts. The solution lies in our choosing to make these things
effective in enabling us to touch the sublime.
Poet William Blake sang about the human capacity
to “see a world in a grain of sand / And a heaven in a wild flower / Hold
infinity in the palm of your hand / And eternity in an hour”. This ability is a
kind of innocence that makes us stand in awe before the beauty of a flower, the
mystery of a pebble, and the splendour of the universe. It is the ability to go
beyond ourselves and touch the infinity lying out there, the infinity of which
we are all parts.
We have largely lost the ability to stand in awe
before the wonders of the world because we have lost the awareness of ourselves
as parts of some bigger whole. Religions take the bigger whole to be God.
Philosophy conceives it as some transcendent reality beyond the grasp of our
rational faculties. Literature and other arts touch it in moments of
inspiration.
We need to touch it ourselves. We may use
religion, contemplation, the arts or whatever we choose in order to carry us
beyond our selves to the reality, the mystery, the magic lying out there
somewhere. This is one of the best ways to deal with suffering.
How to do that?
We need to understand first of all that we are
all autonomous individuals and organic parts of a larger entity at the same
time. We are always performing a tightrope walk between our autonomy and our
integration: asserting our unique individuality while being an integral part of
a society and also of a macroscopic cosmos.
It is a tightrope walk because many of our
individual desires, motives, ideals and beliefs may be in conflict with those
of the community to which we belong. We are obliged to cultivate and express
our urges and ideals without disrupting the harmony that seeks to pervade the
community as well as the cosmos. We should grow into the fullness of our
individual selves while being in harmony with our community and the larger
cosmic system. That is the ideal. But the ideal is seldom achieved. That is one
of the chief reasons of the mounting suffering in our world.
We live in a world that is becoming increasingly
competitive and hence even more increasingly self-centred. Competition is
always about the victory of some individuals over other individuals or groups
of even systems. In a capitalist system everyone is everyone else’s potential rival
one way or another. This rivalry soon extends to the groups or communities to
which the individuals belong. Whole systems like democracy or ideals like
secularism can come crumbling down in such a world. Worse, such demolitions may
even be seen as virtuous victories of the good over evil.
Such battles are rampant in our world today. Some
people emerge as glorious victors while some others end up as pathetic losers.
These battles need to end. The ideal way is to
open our eyes and see the most fundamental reality about ourselves: that we are
not only unique and separate individuals but also integral parts of a larger
whole. Call the larger whole God if you choose. Call it truth or the sublime or
whatever. If we learn to touch that sublime, if we open our ears to the mellow
music of that sublime, our suffering is going to take a different turn.
Suffering will not vanish. We will learn how to
cope with it better.
The sublime opens our eyes and hearts. In plain
words, it makes us understand the reality better and deal with it lovingly.
This understanding and love are the ultimate remedies for unavoidable
suffering.
This relationship with the sublime is a spiritual
condition. You need not be religious for experiencing it. Atheists experience
it in their own diverse ways. Artists experience it through their arts. When
Albert Einstein said, “The most beautiful thing we can experience is the
mysterious; it is the source of all true art and science,” he was referring to
the experience of the sublime. When Mozart said that love – and not
intelligence or imagination – is the real soul of genius, he meant nothing
else.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery’s Little Prince put it
most elegantly: “It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is
essential is invisible to the eye.”
The brain does help us to understand the reality.
As Hinduism teaches, intellectual pursuit or jnana yoga can offer us
enlightenment.
But when it comes to grappling with the riddles
of life, the heart shows the way. Blake saw a world in a grain of sand with his
heart, not his eyes. Mirabai, great devotee of Lord Krishna, could unfurl
herself across the universe by stretching her heart, not her intellect. It is
your heart that will give you the wings to fly.
Will suffering vanish when you learn to see a
world in a grain of sand or to fly in the heavens on wings of the heart?
No. Suffering can never vanish from our life. We
learn to cope with it. We learn to see it from a different perspective.
It is the perspective of the heart. It is with
the heart we see certain essential truths clearly.
When the homo sapiens evolved from their simian
ancestors, the brain continued to evolve while the heart retained its loyalty
to the beast. Our species went on to conquer the whole world with the help of
our evolved brains. We subjugated everything on earth mercilessly to our tools
and technology. We established our mastery over everything on the planet as
well as beyond it in the eternal spaces. We moved light years in a few hundred
calendar years. Great intellectual achievement.
But our hearts remained simian. Very primitive.
Except in the cases of those few enlightened ones, those who chose to touch
eternity in a moment.
Our religions, our arts and our philosophical
teachers all sought to train our hearts. But we chose to convert these entities
into competitive architecture or showbiz or propaganda. They did not touch our
hearts.
They were like the roses in our gardens tended by
hired labourers. Passers-by admired them. But they did not touch our hearts.
Because it is only when you waste time with your roses do they touch your hearts.
The answers to quite a lot of our problems lie in
our own hearts. And we keep seeking them in a lot of other places.
We have wings to fly with, but we choose to walk.
If only you start flying. Once you have conquered
certain heights, you won’t come down, as Richard Bach says in one of his books.
You will spread your wings and fly. You hover over the suffering that belongs
to the earth.
***PS. This is the last chapter of my e-book, Coping with Suffering. The book is available exclusively at Amazon.in
Every word of this post appears to be true. You have signed off (in your e-book) in a very effective manner. Being spiritual is quite different from being religious. The genuinely spiritual ones always rise above the religion(s) and they include agnostics also. Following one's heart is definitely the best thing to do and cope with one's suffering but sometimes one is not able to do so due to the constraints of the worldly life he / she is in.
ReplyDeleteWe have religion today without spirituality. I wished to draw people's attention to that too.
DeleteGlad you liked it.