Skip to main content

Thief

Fiction

Sivaraman was the last person whom I would expect to catch in a dim corner of a bar sitting before a glass of whisky and contemplating the sun waiting for the earth to reappear after a mythical deluge that had drowned the earth for some forty days.

‘The sun is an eternal lover,’ he told me as I sat down opposite him. ‘The earth is the beloved. Unfaithful beloved.’ He sighed like a Shakespearean furnace. ‘But the infidelity is due to helplessness. The flood is beyond the earth’s control.’

Sivaraman had met his old girlfriend that afternoon. She was the unfaithful earth that had emerged after the deluge.

Megha was her name. She was the daughter of Bhargavan who was the caretaker of the Gopika estate where Sivaraman had joined relatively recently as the accountant. Gopika’s owner, Somasundaram, worked in Dubai though he was an ardent Indian nationalist who hated Muslims with all his heart. Gopika stretched across acres and acres of orchards and vegetable farms. Bhargavan was her caretaker for many years. His salary was a rather meagre sum. But he lived quite a king-size life. Soon after joining Gopika as accountant, Sivaraman discovered the source of Bhargavan’s mysterious affluence. Bhargavan was stealing Gopika’s wealth by underreporting her produces. For example, when Bhargavan sold 100 kg of vegetables the records showed 80 kg.

By the time Sivaraman solved the mystery of Bhargavan’s affluence, he had fallen head over heels for Megha. Since love is blind, Sivaraman did not see the dishonesty of his would-be father-in-law. Megha was happy with her would-be husband’s partial blindness. Everyone was happy, in short. But universal happiness is a myth and it does not belong in the world of real men and women.

Sivaraman’s father was diagnosed with some ailment that required a surgery. The young accountant did whatever he could to arrange the money required for the surgery. He sold his mother’s gold bangle and borrowed from all his friends who were not many. He was short of a few thousand rupees. He requested his would-be father-in-law to lend him the required amount.

‘Why do you need my help?’ Bhargavan asked. ‘You’re the accountant. A small manipulation in the accounts is all that you need.’

Sivaraman was not happy with that innovative idea though it came from none other than his would-be father-in-law. But he had little choice. The surgery could not be delayed. So the account was fudged. The Indian nationalist amassing Muslim Dirhams in Dubai wouldn’t ever feel, let alone know, the loss of a few thousand rupees. Moreover, what Sivaraman did was nothing in comparison with what his would-be father-in-law was doing again and again. Morality is comparative, Sivaraman had learnt from his political leaders who always justified their beastly deeds by comparing them with what someone else did in the past. Babur did this and Nehru did that and so on. Present politics became right or wrong in comparison with what Babur and Nehru did.

What Sivaraman did not know, however, was that there are some universal principles that you can’t ignore except at your own peril. If Satyameva Jayate still remains the national motto in spite of 73 years of relentless and escalating assaults on it by the country’s patrons, there must be something universal about it. Maybe, where your father’s surgery is involved your would-be father-in-law’s example eclipses universal principles.

The surgery was a grand success. After all it was performed by the best surgeons in the most advertised multi-speciality hospital in the city. These surgeons don’t make blunders and then justify them by comparing them with what Akbar or Aurangzeb did.

Life returned to normal once again. Sivaraman’s father was back home making a rapid recovery. Bhargavan continued to underreport Gopika’s produces. Sivaraman maintained Gopika’s accounts without fudging them. Megha flirted with Sivaraman on WhatsApp.

Then one day Sivaraman asked Bhargavan for his daughter’s hand.

‘How dare you!’ Bhargavan thundered. ‘I won’t give my daughter to a thief.’

Sivaraman was stunned. He explained that he was no thief, that he had fudged the account just once and that too for his father’s sake, that he ardently believed in the universal principle of Satyameva Jayate. Bhargavan would not listen to any of that.

A few days later Megha’s WhatsApp chat came. ‘Forgt me. Fathr hs arrangd my marage with smbdy workin in Dubai.’

A silence as ominous as the one that descends in a court just prior to the pronouncement of the verdict descended between Sivaraman and me. Even the whisky in our glasses looked despondent and anxious at once.


Frustrated love is the cause of many a good man’s doom. I thought of Majnu and Devdas and was about to think of Romeo when Sivaraman said, ‘I had almost forgotten her until I met her this afternoon.’ After a moment he added like an afterthought, ‘You can never forget your first love. That love is the primordial affinity between the sun and the earth.’Megha had returned from Dubai with her husband on a holiday. Sivaraman saw them during the wedding reception of a common friend. Megha’s husband was totally drunk. He couldn’t even stand on his own feet. Megha stood beside him holding him tightly close to her to prevent him from falling down.


Sivaraman soon found out that the man was a wretched alcoholic. ‘But his business is doing well in Dubai,’ the informer said. ‘He has many wives too there. Lucky guy.’

Devdas rose from the marrow of Sivaraman’s bones. After all he lived in a country where history repeatedly rose from its grave with bloodlust like a restless vampire.

‘I’d have been such a loving husband,’ Sivaraman confronted Bhargavan straightaway. Bhargavan was also attending the wedding reception.

Bhargavan looked at him with unconcealed scorn. ‘He may be a drunkard but not a thief,’ he said and walked away solemnly.

‘And I came here,’ Sivaraman said to me. ‘A drunkard but not a thief.’

 

 

Comments

  1. How true, we all look at morality relatively. We justify our misdeeds by comparing them with something worse we didn't do. Nice to read here after long. :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In this Wonderland

I didn’t write anything in the last few days. Nor did I feel any urge to write. I don’t know if this lack of interest to write is what’s called writer’s block. Or is it simple disenchantment with whatever is happening around me? We’re living in a time that offers much, too much, to writers. The whole world looks like a complex plot for a gigantic epic. The line between truth and fiction has disappeared. Mass murders have become no-news. Animals get more compassion than fellow human beings. Even their excreta are venerated! Folk tales are presented as scientific truths while scientific truths are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. When the young generation in Nepal set fire to their Parliament and Supreme Court buildings, they were making an unmistakable statement: that they are sick of their political leaders and their systems. Is there any country whose leaders don’t sicken their citizens? I’m just wondering. Maybe, there are good leaders still left in a few coun...

Death as a Sculptor

Book Discussion An Introductory Note : This is not a book review but a reflection on one of the many themes in The Infatuations , novel by Javier Marias. If you have any intention of reading the novel, please be forewarned that this post contains spoilers. For my review of the book, without spoilers, read an earlier post: The Infatuations (2013). D eath can reshape the reality for the survivors of the departed. For example, a man’s death can entirely alter the lives of his surviving family members: his wife and children, particularly. That sounds like a cliché. Javier Marias’ novel, The Infatuations , shows us that death can alter a lot more; it can reshape meanings, relationships, and even morality of the people affected by the death. Miguel Deverne is killed by an abnormal man right in the beginning of the novel. It seems like an accidental killing. But it isn’t. There are more people than the apparently insane killer involved in the crime and there are motives which are di...

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

When Cricket Becomes War

Illustration by Copilot Designer Why did India agree to play Pakistan at all if the animosity runs so deep that Indian players could not even extend the customary handshake: a simple ritual that embodies the very essence of sportsmanship? Cricket is not war, in the first place. When a nation turns a game into a war, it does not defeat its rival; it only wages war on its own culture, poisoning its acclaimed greatness. India which claims to be Viswaguru , the world’s Guru, is degenerating itself day after day with mounting hatred against everyone who is not Hindu. How can we forget what India did to a young cricket player named Mohammed Siraj , especially in this context? In the recent test series against England, India achieved an unexpected draw because of Siraj. 1113 balls and 23 wickets. He was instrumental in India’s series-levelling victory in the final Test at the Oval and was declared the Player of the Match. But India did not celebrate him. Instead, it mocked him for his o...

Whose Rama?

Book Review Title: Whose Rama? [Malayalam] Author: T S Syamkumar Publisher: D C Books, Kerala Pages: 352 Rama may be an incarnation of God Vishnu, but is he as noble a man [ Maryada Purushottam ] as he is projected to be by certain sections of Hindus? This is the theme of Dr Syamkumar’s book, written in Malayalam. There is no English translation available yet. Rama is a creation of the Brahmins, asserts the author of this book. The Ramayana upholds the unjust caste system created by Brahmins for their own wellbeing. Everyone else exists for the sake of the Brahmin wellbeing. If the Kshatriyas are given the role of rulers, it is only because the Brahmins need such men to fight and die for them. Valmiki’s Rama too upheld that unjust system merely because that was his Kshatriya-dharma, allotted by the Brahmins. One of the many evils that Valmiki’s Rama perpetrates heartlessly is the killing of Shambuka, a boy who belonged to a low caste but chose to become an ascetic. The...