Remember the Pink Chaddi campaign
that rocked India in 2009? Hundreds of pink panties were couriered to Pramod
Muthalik’s office by Indian women as a mark of protest against his organisation’s
[Sri Ram Sena] offensive actions upon young couples found together on Valentine’s
Day. The colour pink was chosen because that colour was considered to be
conspicuously feminine. The campaign was a revolutionary assertion of autonomy
by India’s women.
Now look at this quote from a
trade publication called Earnshaw’s Infants’ Department, published in
1918: “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys
and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and
stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more
delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl.”
Pink for boys and blue for girls. That was a
century back. Today it’s just the opposite. Who makes such conventions? The
society, of course. And randomly too. There is no rationale behind why boys should
wear pink and girls blue or vice-versa. Gender is a similar whimsical social
construct. The society constructs the gender conventions. In other words, the
society decides what boys and girls should or can do.
But the time has changed. “Why should boys have
all the fun?” Girls are asking that question not only in commercial ads today.
Many social conventions are made by a group
of people who wish to have power over others. The ancient caste system with
very clear rules about the roles that people can and should play was a creation
of a group of shrewd Brahmins who knew how to wield power over the others effectively.
Who made the conventions of the Sati, devadasis, restrictions on women, and so
on? The same power-mongers and power-brokers, who else?
The times have changed though many top men in India
seem to be unaware of that and hence cling to ancient systems like barnacles clinging
to rocks till death. These men may seem to be currently very powerful and even
effective but will end up eventually looking like bizarre gargoyles on the
edifices of history. The world has travelled far ahead from centuries-old sanctimonious
conventions and rituals. Gender roles have also undergone revolutionary
changes.
Women have proved that they are no less than men in
any way, anywhere. Women have conquered the peaks that men considered their sole
prerogatives earlier. Women have embraced careers that were once exclusively
male romances. In fact, women are outshining men in many areas. Pink is indeed
turning out to be a “more decided and stronger” colour. Maybe, today’s boys who
are increasingly looking effeminate need to arrogate to themselves the pink
colour.
PS. This post is part
of Blogchatter’s CauseAChatter.
It had been quite a revelation when I first read the words - gender is a social construct. But once we understand that we also understand that these constructs can be broken. We should all just wear pink!
ReplyDeleteInterestingly most people want more gender equality, more personal freedom. Yet as a nation we seem to be regressing to some old straitjackets because of some of our worthless leaders.
DeleteIt's true gender roles have undergone changes over the years. Knowledge amongst people is increasing and people are making choices based on what they want rather than what society tells them
ReplyDeleteThat freedom is very essential. Unfortunately today in India certain political powers are trying to curtail that freedom.
DeleteThanks.
ReplyDelete