Skip to main content

Sustainability and relationships

Atop development - pic from Delhi's outskirts (c2010)


Every ecosystem has its own ways of survival. No, not just survival but flourishing. Leave ecosystems to themselves and you will see how they flourish without any problem. Bring a ‘civilised’ human being there and their doom will begin.

The tribal people and Adivasis and other communities like them understood ecosystems and respected their needs. They are not allowed to survive, however. Our craze for development drives out the tribals and the Adivasis from their dwelling places and we impose our degenerative ‘civilisation’ on their healthy systems.

In an interview to The National Geographic Traveller [July-Aug 2022], Amitav Ghosh points out the example of the Massai people who have lived in the Ngorongora crater for thousands of years in harmony with the ecosystem of the place. These people are now being thrust out at gunpoint, says Ghosh, by the advocates of development. These ‘developers’ are “using conservation groups under the guise of ecology and conservation, using weaponry to shoot at these people and thrust them out…” Why? Ghosh tells us that “some sort of a company in the UAE, which I bet if you look close enough you’ll see that it’s owned not by an Arab but very likely by an Indian or someone. What they’re doing is that they’re throwing these people out, and they’re going to bring in huge tourism conglomerates, who will bring in urban Africans, urban Asians, and Europeans and Americans.”

Tilting the system in favour of one species is precisely what non-sustainability is about. This is just what human beings have been doing for centuries. Assuming that we are some sort of divine entities or at least creatures with divine sanctions, we lorded over the planet. And imperilled most ecosystems.

Ghosh cites the example of Ranthambore tiger reserve. Earlier people lived in perfect peace with their surroundings there. Now it’s a Disneyfied tourist centre where tigers obviously can’t survive. Human greed has led to the deterioration of many such ecosystems. The recent collapse of a dam near Uttarkashi is yet another reminder to us that we need to check our attitudes towards our planet.

Ghosh shows us a way, an alternative from Botswana. There the agencies of development work with local people. They leave the local people in the forest instead of throwing them out in the name of development. These local people are given the power to decide how others will visit the forest and see their ways of life. Consequently, there are no safari raiders in the forests of Botswana.

The plain truth is that we cannot invent sustainable human communities from the scratch. We need to model them after nature’s ecosystems. How do we do it? We have to make our businesses, economy, physical structures and technologies in harmony with nature’s inherent ability to sustain life. “Sustainable communities evolve their patters of living over time in continual interaction with other living systems, both human and nonhuman,” as Fritjof Capra puts it in his book, The Hidden Connections. Relationships and interactions – that’s the fundamental secret of sustainability.

PS. This post is part of Blogchatter’s CauseAChatter.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Bihar Election

Satish Acharya's Cartoon on how votes were bought in Bihar My wife has been stripped of her voting rights in the revised electoral roll. She has always been a conscientious voter unlike me. I refused to vote in the last Lok Sabha election though I stood outside the polling booth for Maggie to perform what she claimed was her duty as a citizen. The irony now is that she, the dutiful citizen, has been stripped of the right, while I, the ostensible renegade gets the right that I don’t care for. Since the Booth Level Officer [BLO] was my neighbour, he went out of his way to ring up some higher officer, sitting in my house, to enquire about Maggie’s exclusion. As a result, I was given the assurance that he, the BLO, would do whatever was in his power to get my wife her voting right. More than the voting right, what really bothered me was whether the Modi government was going to strip my wife of her Indian citizenship. Anything is possible in Modi’s India: Modi hai to Mumkin hai .   ...

Nehru’s Secularism

Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, and Narendra Modi, the present one, are diametrically opposite to each other. Take any parameter, from boorishness to sophistication or religious views, and these two men would remain poles apart. Is it Nehru’s towering presence in history that intimidates Modi into hurling ceaseless allegations against him? Today, 14 Nov, is Nehru’s birth anniversary and Modi’s tweet was uncharacteristically terse. It said, “Tributes to former Prime Minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Ji on the occasion of his birth anniversary.” Somebody posted a trenchant cartoon in the comments section.  Nehru had his flaws, no doubt. He was as human as Modi. But what made him a giant while Modi remains a dwarf – as in the cartoon above – is the way they viewed human beings. For Nehru, all human beings mattered, irrespective of their caste, creed, language, etc. His concept of secularism stands a billion notches above Modi’s Hindutva-nationalism. Nehru’s ide...

The Art of Subjugation: A Case Study

Two Pulaya women, 1926 [Courtesy Mathrubhumi ] The Pulaya and Paraya communities were the original landowners in Kerala until the Brahmins arrived from the North with their religion and gods. They did not own the land individually; the lands belonged to the tribes. Then in the 8 th – 10 th centuries CE, the Brahmins known as Namboothiris in Kerala arrived and deceived the Pulayas and Parayas lock, stock, and barrel. With the help of religion. The Namboothiris proclaimed themselves the custodians of all wealth by divine mandate. They possessed the Vedic and Sanskrit mantras and tantras to prove their claims. The aboriginal people of Kerala couldn’t make head or tail of concepts such as Brahmadeya (land donated to Brahmins becoming sacred land) or Manu’s injunctions such as: “Land given to a Brahmin should never be taken back” [8.410] or “A king who confiscates land from Brahmins incurs sin” [8.394]. The Brahmins came, claimed certain powers given by the gods, and started exploi...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...