Skip to main content

Modi: Sultan of Hindustan

Book Review

Title: Modi’s India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy

Author: Christophe Jaffrelot

Narendra Modi has already achieved his goal of making India a Hindu Rashtra. In practice, India today is a country where all non-Hindus face the threat of being sent to prison for as little a ‘crime’ as frowning at the Prime Minister or his party or their holy cows. Soon India will have a new Constitution too and the transformation will be complete. The irony of it all is that Modi started with the slogan that the Hindus are in danger [Hindu khatre mein hai]. Today all non-Hindus in India stand stripped of all rights as citizens.

Christophe Jaffrelot’s book takes a deep look at this Hindu Rashtra that Modi has moulded. Jaffrelot argues that Modi has converted his country into an ethnic democracy where the ethnic majority coincides with the electoral majority, thereby relegating the minorities to the margins. The strategy employed by Modi for achieving this objective in such a short period is quite simple: create an Other, project that Other as the nation’s enemy and himself as the nation’s Saviour. Thus the non-Hindus, particularly the Muslims in India as well as Pakistan, became the nation’s enemies and Modi metamorphosed into Hindu Hriday Samrat. An enormous amount of money was spent on propaganda too in the process.

Modi’s India is a Hindu India. The nation = the majority community. The minorities are deprived of all rights, justice, jobs, etc. Jaffrelot’s book cites ample examples for this. The book shows how Muslims have been wiped out of all significant places in the country like the law enforcement agencies and armed forces. Their representation in the Parliament and state assemblies also is minimal now. They are even deprived of their food.  

Modi knows how to win every election by making use of strife as the only motivating factor for voting his party. He has made non-Hindus enemies of the nation and hence it becomes the patriotic duty of every Hindu to vote for the BJP which is the only Hindu-loving party. Save Hindus and Hinduism by electing Modi and his party. The added advantage of this strategy was that Modi could bring the low caste Hindus into the Sangh Parivar fold.

The BJP was originally an upper caste party. In his first term as Prime Minister, Modi was more interested in the upper caste Hindus, argues Jaffrelot. He helped the upper castes to recover their dominant position from the OBCs and Dalits who were given much importance by Congress as well as regional parties earlier. But Modi made sure that the backward classes were not ignored. They were given Mann ki Baat and some alms like the PM Kisan Yojana. Most of the schemes meant to help the poor like cooking gas connections and toilet constructions ended in smoke when the price of the cylinder rose beyond people’s reach and the toilets had no water supply.

Inequality has reached its peak under Modi’s wing. Modi loves the rich and only the rich. Particularly the Hindu rich though he is eager to hug the non-Hindu leaders of other countries just to show off his international connections. Jaffrelot’s contention is that Modi works on “the ideological assumption that instead of assisting the poor and creating a culture of dependence, the middle class, the rich, and business interests should be liberated from state constraints. This supply-side policy found expression in the decline of direct taxes and the rise of indirect taxation. Correlatively, the superrich amassed an increasingly large share of the national wealth…. [Modi’s] relationship with some of India’s big businesses constituted a prime example of crony capitalism, which his close contacts were the first to benefit from. This connection enabled the BJP to raise funds for his election campaigns.”

It doesn’t mean that Modi neglected the poor altogether. He co-opted them as the much-needed lumpen elements for doing the dirty job of attacking the nation’s perceived enemies on the streets. Organisations like the Bajrang Dal acquired much power and wreaked much havoc on the minorities. Jaffrelot enumerates the attacks that Muslim and Christian institutions suffered all over the country from the time Modi assumed power in 2014.

The minorities are not the only casualties, however. More tragically, perhaps, have the institutions like the judiciary, the Election Commission, Central Information Commission, CBI, NIA, CVC, etc been perverted by Modi. And the media. And the Opposition too. Modi made opposition MLAs and MPs sheer commodities meant for sale and purchase. Democracy is sheer mockery in Modi’s India.

Jaffrelot concludes that Modi is now the Sultan of Hindustan. His is a personal rulership, like the erstwhile sultans’, based on a mixture of fear and rewards. He rewards those who uphold his sultanate. He demolishes all others one way or the other.

Addendum: This is the best book I read this year. It is scholarly in approach though my review may make you feel otherwise.

PS.  This post is a part of Blogchatter Blog Hop.

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    thank you for the review... sadly, here, the cost of the book (even e-form) is prohibitively expensive. I shall have to see if the local library in this remote Scottish town has a copy! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I bought my copy from Amazon which gave a generous discount.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Bihar Election

Satish Acharya's Cartoon on how votes were bought in Bihar My wife has been stripped of her voting rights in the revised electoral roll. She has always been a conscientious voter unlike me. I refused to vote in the last Lok Sabha election though I stood outside the polling booth for Maggie to perform what she claimed was her duty as a citizen. The irony now is that she, the dutiful citizen, has been stripped of the right, while I, the ostensible renegade gets the right that I don’t care for. Since the Booth Level Officer [BLO] was my neighbour, he went out of his way to ring up some higher officer, sitting in my house, to enquire about Maggie’s exclusion. As a result, I was given the assurance that he, the BLO, would do whatever was in his power to get my wife her voting right. More than the voting right, what really bothered me was whether the Modi government was going to strip my wife of her Indian citizenship. Anything is possible in Modi’s India: Modi hai to Mumkin hai .   ...

Nehru’s Secularism

Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, and Narendra Modi, the present one, are diametrically opposite to each other. Take any parameter, from boorishness to sophistication or religious views, and these two men would remain poles apart. Is it Nehru’s towering presence in history that intimidates Modi into hurling ceaseless allegations against him? Today, 14 Nov, is Nehru’s birth anniversary and Modi’s tweet was uncharacteristically terse. It said, “Tributes to former Prime Minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Ji on the occasion of his birth anniversary.” Somebody posted a trenchant cartoon in the comments section.  Nehru had his flaws, no doubt. He was as human as Modi. But what made him a giant while Modi remains a dwarf – as in the cartoon above – is the way they viewed human beings. For Nehru, all human beings mattered, irrespective of their caste, creed, language, etc. His concept of secularism stands a billion notches above Modi’s Hindutva-nationalism. Nehru’s ide...

The Art of Subjugation: A Case Study

Two Pulaya women, 1926 [Courtesy Mathrubhumi ] The Pulaya and Paraya communities were the original landowners in Kerala until the Brahmins arrived from the North with their religion and gods. They did not own the land individually; the lands belonged to the tribes. Then in the 8 th – 10 th centuries CE, the Brahmins known as Namboothiris in Kerala arrived and deceived the Pulayas and Parayas lock, stock, and barrel. With the help of religion. The Namboothiris proclaimed themselves the custodians of all wealth by divine mandate. They possessed the Vedic and Sanskrit mantras and tantras to prove their claims. The aboriginal people of Kerala couldn’t make head or tail of concepts such as Brahmadeya (land donated to Brahmins becoming sacred land) or Manu’s injunctions such as: “Land given to a Brahmin should never be taken back” [8.410] or “A king who confiscates land from Brahmins incurs sin” [8.394]. The Brahmins came, claimed certain powers given by the gods, and started exploi...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...