Skip to main content

Modi: Sultan of Hindustan

Book Review

Title: Modi’s India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy

Author: Christophe Jaffrelot

Narendra Modi has already achieved his goal of making India a Hindu Rashtra. In practice, India today is a country where all non-Hindus face the threat of being sent to prison for as little a ‘crime’ as frowning at the Prime Minister or his party or their holy cows. Soon India will have a new Constitution too and the transformation will be complete. The irony of it all is that Modi started with the slogan that the Hindus are in danger [Hindu khatre mein hai]. Today all non-Hindus in India stand stripped of all rights as citizens.

Christophe Jaffrelot’s book takes a deep look at this Hindu Rashtra that Modi has moulded. Jaffrelot argues that Modi has converted his country into an ethnic democracy where the ethnic majority coincides with the electoral majority, thereby relegating the minorities to the margins. The strategy employed by Modi for achieving this objective in such a short period is quite simple: create an Other, project that Other as the nation’s enemy and himself as the nation’s Saviour. Thus the non-Hindus, particularly the Muslims in India as well as Pakistan, became the nation’s enemies and Modi metamorphosed into Hindu Hriday Samrat. An enormous amount of money was spent on propaganda too in the process.

Modi’s India is a Hindu India. The nation = the majority community. The minorities are deprived of all rights, justice, jobs, etc. Jaffrelot’s book cites ample examples for this. The book shows how Muslims have been wiped out of all significant places in the country like the law enforcement agencies and armed forces. Their representation in the Parliament and state assemblies also is minimal now. They are even deprived of their food.  

Modi knows how to win every election by making use of strife as the only motivating factor for voting his party. He has made non-Hindus enemies of the nation and hence it becomes the patriotic duty of every Hindu to vote for the BJP which is the only Hindu-loving party. Save Hindus and Hinduism by electing Modi and his party. The added advantage of this strategy was that Modi could bring the low caste Hindus into the Sangh Parivar fold.

The BJP was originally an upper caste party. In his first term as Prime Minister, Modi was more interested in the upper caste Hindus, argues Jaffrelot. He helped the upper castes to recover their dominant position from the OBCs and Dalits who were given much importance by Congress as well as regional parties earlier. But Modi made sure that the backward classes were not ignored. They were given Mann ki Baat and some alms like the PM Kisan Yojana. Most of the schemes meant to help the poor like cooking gas connections and toilet constructions ended in smoke when the price of the cylinder rose beyond people’s reach and the toilets had no water supply.

Inequality has reached its peak under Modi’s wing. Modi loves the rich and only the rich. Particularly the Hindu rich though he is eager to hug the non-Hindu leaders of other countries just to show off his international connections. Jaffrelot’s contention is that Modi works on “the ideological assumption that instead of assisting the poor and creating a culture of dependence, the middle class, the rich, and business interests should be liberated from state constraints. This supply-side policy found expression in the decline of direct taxes and the rise of indirect taxation. Correlatively, the superrich amassed an increasingly large share of the national wealth…. [Modi’s] relationship with some of India’s big businesses constituted a prime example of crony capitalism, which his close contacts were the first to benefit from. This connection enabled the BJP to raise funds for his election campaigns.”

It doesn’t mean that Modi neglected the poor altogether. He co-opted them as the much-needed lumpen elements for doing the dirty job of attacking the nation’s perceived enemies on the streets. Organisations like the Bajrang Dal acquired much power and wreaked much havoc on the minorities. Jaffrelot enumerates the attacks that Muslim and Christian institutions suffered all over the country from the time Modi assumed power in 2014.

The minorities are not the only casualties, however. More tragically, perhaps, have the institutions like the judiciary, the Election Commission, Central Information Commission, CBI, NIA, CVC, etc been perverted by Modi. And the media. And the Opposition too. Modi made opposition MLAs and MPs sheer commodities meant for sale and purchase. Democracy is sheer mockery in Modi’s India.

Jaffrelot concludes that Modi is now the Sultan of Hindustan. His is a personal rulership, like the erstwhile sultans’, based on a mixture of fear and rewards. He rewards those who uphold his sultanate. He demolishes all others one way or the other.

Addendum: This is the best book I read this year. It is scholarly in approach though my review may make you feel otherwise.

PS.  This post is a part of Blogchatter Blog Hop.

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    thank you for the review... sadly, here, the cost of the book (even e-form) is prohibitively expensive. I shall have to see if the local library in this remote Scottish town has a copy! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I bought my copy from Amazon which gave a generous discount.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Our gods must have died laughing

A friend forwarded a video clip this morning. It is an extract from a speech that celebrated Malayalam movie actor Sreenivasan delivered years ago. In the year 1984, Sreenivasan decided to marry the woman he was in love with. But his career in movies had just started and so he hadn’t made much money. Knowing his financial condition, another actor, Innocent, gave him Rs 400. Innocent wasn’t doing well either in the profession. “Alice’s bangle,” Innocent said. He had pawned or sold his wife’s bangle to get that amount for his friend. Then Sreenivasan went to Mammootty, who eventually became Malayalam’s superstar, to request for help. Mammootty gave him Rs 2000. Citing the goodness of the two men, Sreenivasan said that the wedding necklace ( mangalsutra ) he put ceremoniously around the neck of his Hindu wife was funded by a Christian (Innocent) and a Muslim (Mammootty). “What does religion matter?” Sreenivasan asks in the video. “You either refuse to believe in any or believe in a...