Skip to main content

Modi: Sultan of Hindustan

Book Review

Title: Modi’s India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy

Author: Christophe Jaffrelot

Narendra Modi has already achieved his goal of making India a Hindu Rashtra. In practice, India today is a country where all non-Hindus face the threat of being sent to prison for as little a ‘crime’ as frowning at the Prime Minister or his party or their holy cows. Soon India will have a new Constitution too and the transformation will be complete. The irony of it all is that Modi started with the slogan that the Hindus are in danger [Hindu khatre mein hai]. Today all non-Hindus in India stand stripped of all rights as citizens.

Christophe Jaffrelot’s book takes a deep look at this Hindu Rashtra that Modi has moulded. Jaffrelot argues that Modi has converted his country into an ethnic democracy where the ethnic majority coincides with the electoral majority, thereby relegating the minorities to the margins. The strategy employed by Modi for achieving this objective in such a short period is quite simple: create an Other, project that Other as the nation’s enemy and himself as the nation’s Saviour. Thus the non-Hindus, particularly the Muslims in India as well as Pakistan, became the nation’s enemies and Modi metamorphosed into Hindu Hriday Samrat. An enormous amount of money was spent on propaganda too in the process.

Modi’s India is a Hindu India. The nation = the majority community. The minorities are deprived of all rights, justice, jobs, etc. Jaffrelot’s book cites ample examples for this. The book shows how Muslims have been wiped out of all significant places in the country like the law enforcement agencies and armed forces. Their representation in the Parliament and state assemblies also is minimal now. They are even deprived of their food.  

Modi knows how to win every election by making use of strife as the only motivating factor for voting his party. He has made non-Hindus enemies of the nation and hence it becomes the patriotic duty of every Hindu to vote for the BJP which is the only Hindu-loving party. Save Hindus and Hinduism by electing Modi and his party. The added advantage of this strategy was that Modi could bring the low caste Hindus into the Sangh Parivar fold.

The BJP was originally an upper caste party. In his first term as Prime Minister, Modi was more interested in the upper caste Hindus, argues Jaffrelot. He helped the upper castes to recover their dominant position from the OBCs and Dalits who were given much importance by Congress as well as regional parties earlier. But Modi made sure that the backward classes were not ignored. They were given Mann ki Baat and some alms like the PM Kisan Yojana. Most of the schemes meant to help the poor like cooking gas connections and toilet constructions ended in smoke when the price of the cylinder rose beyond people’s reach and the toilets had no water supply.

Inequality has reached its peak under Modi’s wing. Modi loves the rich and only the rich. Particularly the Hindu rich though he is eager to hug the non-Hindu leaders of other countries just to show off his international connections. Jaffrelot’s contention is that Modi works on “the ideological assumption that instead of assisting the poor and creating a culture of dependence, the middle class, the rich, and business interests should be liberated from state constraints. This supply-side policy found expression in the decline of direct taxes and the rise of indirect taxation. Correlatively, the superrich amassed an increasingly large share of the national wealth…. [Modi’s] relationship with some of India’s big businesses constituted a prime example of crony capitalism, which his close contacts were the first to benefit from. This connection enabled the BJP to raise funds for his election campaigns.”

It doesn’t mean that Modi neglected the poor altogether. He co-opted them as the much-needed lumpen elements for doing the dirty job of attacking the nation’s perceived enemies on the streets. Organisations like the Bajrang Dal acquired much power and wreaked much havoc on the minorities. Jaffrelot enumerates the attacks that Muslim and Christian institutions suffered all over the country from the time Modi assumed power in 2014.

The minorities are not the only casualties, however. More tragically, perhaps, have the institutions like the judiciary, the Election Commission, Central Information Commission, CBI, NIA, CVC, etc been perverted by Modi. And the media. And the Opposition too. Modi made opposition MLAs and MPs sheer commodities meant for sale and purchase. Democracy is sheer mockery in Modi’s India.

Jaffrelot concludes that Modi is now the Sultan of Hindustan. His is a personal rulership, like the erstwhile sultans’, based on a mixture of fear and rewards. He rewards those who uphold his sultanate. He demolishes all others one way or the other.

Addendum: This is the best book I read this year. It is scholarly in approach though my review may make you feel otherwise.

PS.  This post is a part of Blogchatter Blog Hop.

 

Comments

  1. Hari OM
    thank you for the review... sadly, here, the cost of the book (even e-form) is prohibitively expensive. I shall have to see if the local library in this remote Scottish town has a copy! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I bought my copy from Amazon which gave a generous discount.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...